Abstract

The seismic provisions for special concentrically braced frame (SCBF) had expected the properly detailed braces to provide inelastic cyclic deformation of 10 - 20 ductility without fracture during the design earthquake ground motions over 30 years prior to 2022. The new seismic provisions for SCBF in AISC 341–22 eliminates the clear and quantifiable statements on the expected capacity and demand of the braces, and indicates that the diagonal braces can sustain large inelastic cyclic deformations without experiencing premature failures if they are properly detailed for ductility as prescribed in the provisions. The appearance of such word as “large inelastic deformation” and “premature failure” causes a concern about the uncertainty. One might wonder why a range of amount of inelastic cyclic deformation capacity for a properly detailed brace cannot be defined after more than 40 years of extensive research on SCBF. This paper presents a study using available data accumulated over more than 40 years to investigate how much inelastic cyclic deformations are needed for braces to avoid fracture under the design earthquake, and concludes that the SCBFs with properly detailed square HSS have insufficient inelastic cyclic deformations to avoid experiencing premature failures that lead to structural collapse under the design earthquake.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.