Evaluation of Interior Circulation in a High-Resolution Global Ocean Model. Part I: Deep and Bottom Waters

Abstract

Abstract Global watermass ventilation pathways and time scales are investigated using an “eddy permitting” (¼°) offline tracer model. Unlike previous Lagrangian trajectory studies, here an offline model based on a complete tracer equation that includes three-dimensional advection and mixing is employed. In doing so, the authors are able to meaningfully simulate chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) uptake and assess model skill against observation. This is the first time an eddy-permitting model has been subjected to such an assessment of interior ocean ventilation. The offline model is forced by seasonally varying prescribed velocity, temperature, and salinity fields of a state-of-the-art ocean general circulation model. A seasonally varying mixed layer parameterization is incorporated to account for the degradation of surface convection processes resulting from the temporal averaging. A series of CFC simulations are assessed against observations to investigate interdecadal-time-scale ventilation using a variety of mixed layer criteria. Simulated tracer inventories and penetration depths are in good agreement with observations, especially for thermocline, mode, and surface waters. Deep water from the Labrador Sea is well represented, forming a distinct deep western boundary current that branches at the equator, although concentrations are lower than observed. The formation of bottom water, which occurs around the Antarctic margin, is also generally too weak, although there is excellent qualitative agreement with observations in the region of the Ross and Weddell Seas. Multicentury ventilation of the outflow of North Atlantic Deep Water and bottom water from the Antarctic Margin are investigated using 1000-yr passive tracer experiments with specified interior source regions. The model captures many of the detailed pathways evident from observations, with much of the discrepancy accounted for by differences between actual and modeled topography. A comparison between model-derived “tracer age” and Δ14C “advection age” provides a semiquantitative assessment of model skill at these longer time scales.