Abstract

ABSTRACTDichelobacter nodosus is a fastidious, strictly anaerobic bacterium, an obligate parasite of the ruminant hoof, and the essential causative agent of virulent ovine footrot. The clinical disease results from a complex interplay between the pathogen, the environment, and the host. Sheep flocks diagnosed with virulent but not benign footrot in Australia may be quarantined and required to undergo a compulsory eradication program, with costs met by the farmer. Virulence of D. nodosus at least partially depends on the elaboration of a protease encoded by aprV2 and manifests as elastase activity. Laboratory virulence tests are used to assist diagnosis because clinical differentiation of virulent and benign footrot can be challenging during the early stages of disease or when the disease is not fully expressed due to unfavorable pasture conditions. Using samples collected from foot lesions from 960 sheep from 40 flocks in four different geographic regions, we evaluated the analytical characteristics of qPCR tests for the protease gene alleles aprV2 and aprB2, and compared these with results from phenotypic protease (elastase and gelatin gel) tests. There was a low level of agreement between clinical diagnosis and quantitative PCR (qPCR) test outcomes at both the flock and sample levels and poor agreement between qPCR test outcomes and the results of phenotypic virulence tests. The diagnostic specificity of the qPCR test was low at both the flock and individual swab levels (31.3% and 18.8%, respectively). By contrast, agreement between the elastase test and clinical diagnosis was high at both the flock level (diagnostic sensitivity [DSe], 100%; diagnostic specificity [DSp], 78.6%) and the isolate level (DSe, 69.5%; DSp, 80.5%).

Highlights

  • Farm Animal Health, Sydney School of Veterinary Science and School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The

  • Forty Australian sheep flocks were selected for this study, including 24 flocks with clinically virulent footrot and 16 flocks with clinically benign footrot (Table 1)

  • We undertook an evaluation of clinical diagnoses and microbial virulence tests with an emphasis on the quantitative PCR (qPCR) tests developed by Stäuble et al (22) and Frosth et al (21), and we subjected the test developed by Frosth et al (21) to a larger evaluation, in accordance with chapter 1.1.6 of the Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals (27), which states that a diagnostic test must be evaluated using appropriate reference samples from a defined target population to be declared fit for its intended purpose

Read more

Summary

Objectives

The aim of this study was to subject these tests to the important initial steps in the validation pathway outlined in chapter 1.1.6 of the Manual of Diagnostic Tests and

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.