Abstract
Mega-ensemble climate projection results are expected to be used for investigating future changes in design condition, such as wave height and storm surged. However, climate models are known to have some uncertainties making bias correction necessary. We performed wave modeling was performed based on typhoon tracks extracted from megaensemble projections. Three bias correction methods were investigated, and the variation induced by these methods was evaluated. The corrected future wave heights showed variations among various locations, and they were larger than the variations caused by the difference in bias correction methods for the return periods of 1/30 and 1/50. This result suggests that appropriately selecting a correction method is not a significant issue in coastal planning.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
