Abstract
Electronic health record (EHR) systems and disease management programs (DMP) are often promoted, but associated health care cost changes are not well understood. To evaluate the association between annual health care costs of patients with type 2 diabetes and the use of an electronic health record system with a disease management program (EHR/DMP) in general practice. This retrospective cohort study examined patients with type 2 diabetes in Denmark between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2014, who attended practices that either used an EHR/DMP at a high level or never used the disease management system. An EHR/DMP system was rolled out across general practices in Denmark beginning in 2011 and was discontinued in 2014. Data were analyzed between March 2019 and March 2020. The main outcome was total health care costs, and the secondary outcomes were primary care, medication, nonhospital specialist, and hospital (total, outpatient, inpatient, and emergency) costs. Regression models were used to estimate EHR/DMP-associated percentage differences in patients' annual health care treatment costs across health care treatment categories. All models included general practice-level fixed effects and patient-level controls. Two-part models examined robustness of estimated associations for hospital cost categories. Of 33 970 patients included in the analysis, 15 953 (8016 [50.2%] male; mean [SD] age, 59.9 [13.3] years) attended 244 general practices that used the system at a high level, and 18 017 (9291 [51.6%] male; mean [SD] age, 60.0 [12.9] years) attended 344 general practices that had never used the system. Use of the EHR/DMP was associated with 3.2% higher (95% CI, 0.9%-5.6%) annual general practice treatment costs and with 6.4% lower (95% CI, -11.6% to -1.2%) annual hospital emergency visit costs. The associations between EHR/DMP use and annual total hospital (percentage difference, -0.8%; 95% CI, -7.5% to 5.7%) and total health care (percentage difference, -0.1%; 95% CI, -2.1% to 1.9%) cost changes were not statistically significant. Among patients with type 2 diabetes, attendance at general practices that used an EHR/DMP was associated with a moderate increase in primary care costs and a reduction in emergency hospital visit costs but no significant change in total health care costs. Large health care cost savings associated with improved use of EHR-based disease management systems should not be expected to be realized in the short term.
Highlights
The implementation of electronic health record (EHR) systems has been a global shift in the delivery of health care over past decades
Among patients with type 2 diabetes, attendance at general practices that used an EHR/disease management programs (DMP) was associated with a moderate increase in primary care costs and a reduction in emergency hospital visit costs but no significant change in total health care costs
Abbreviation: GP, general practice. a Patients treated at GPs using an electronic health record disease management program were the treatment group and patients treated at GPs that never used an electronic health record disease management program were the control group
Summary
The implementation of electronic health record (EHR) systems has been a global shift in the delivery of health care over past decades. The association of EHR systems in primary care with health care utilization has been investigated, with some evidence of improvements in health care delivery and outcomes. Evidence has shown that implementation of EHR systems may be associated with reductions in emergency visits and hospital admissions among patients with diabetes.[3] Health care cost changes associated with EHR system use among different patient groups have not been well established.[3,4]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.