Evaluation of a heart disease survey and education program for general practitioners

Abstract

In 1989 we mailed a questionnaire to all 461 general practitioners (GPs) identified as currently practising in the Eastern Metropolitan Health Region of Sydney. This was the first phase of a program to assess, amplify and reassess GPs' knowledge of the risk factors for heart disease and measure their attitudes and beliefs about their role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. The second phase was an education program designed to meet the needs identified by the first questionnaire. Phase three was a postintervention questionnaire. Fifty-six per cent (260/461) responded to the first questionnaire. This follow-up group were mailed the second questionnaire, to which 52 per cent (135/260) responded. Thirty per cent of the original sample (139/461) attended the education program and 30 per cent (79/260) of the follow-up group did so. At baseline, the respondents' level of risk factor knowledge was good, but after the education program there was still a large gap between what they said they knew and the amount of advice they said they would give to patients. The only significant increase in the amount of advice after the intervention was to 'control blood pressure'. This applied whether the GP had participated in the intervention or not. When GPs were asked how often in the last month they had actually given advice to reduce cardiovascular disease risk, program attenders reported offering it more frequently than nonattenders. We also attempted to determine whether any particular demographic characteristics could predict respondents to the questionnaires and/or the educational program.