Abstract
Because of their small size, Cryptosporidium oocysts cannot be easily filtered from water. This study evaluated the use of surrogates for measuring the microbial treatment performance of two point‐of‐use devices incorporating filtration with electrostatic charge interaction mechanisms. Both systems were challenged with Cryptosporidium oocysts (4‐6 μm), Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) spores (~1.2 μm), polystyrene latex (PSL) beads (~ 3 μm), Escherichia coli, and MS2 bacteriophage. The target biological contaminants were more effectively removed than the PSL beads, and the smaller B. subtilis spores mimicked Cryptosporidium oocyst removal more closely than the ~ 3‐μm PSL beads. Thus, surface charge appears to be an important factor for microorganism attachment, and B. subtilis spores should be considered a more appropriate surrogate than PSL beads for evaluating Cryptosporidium movement through charged media. For noncharged devices, PSL beads may still be useful as a surrogate for Cryptosporidium.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.