Abstract
AbstractSection 2 of the Capper‐Volstead Act requires the secretary of agriculture to determine whether a cooperative has unduly enhanced its prices. There has been no consensus about what level of price enhancement is too high. This paper contrasts pricing of cooperative and proprietary brands of differentiated food products. Empirical evidence indicates that market share and advertising do not generally provide cooperatives any more power to enhance prices than they give proprietary firms. The paper suggests a standard for undue price enhancement, the predicted price level of proprietary brands in similarly structured markets.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
