Abstract

This research analyses feminism-related tweets produced over a period of two months by both a male representative and a female representative of each of the four principal political parties in Spain (PP, PSOE, Ciudadanos and Podemos). Although their behaviour on Twitter is similar, the differences found are more marked by ideology than by gender. A content analysis shows that the parties tend to reinforce their ideological programme on Twitter, which is corroborated as a space for disseminating topics related to feminism, but not as a space for debate. Men tend to publish more than women and on less controversial topics, which allows us to observe the reproduction of patriarchal roles in the net.

Highlights

  • In 2007, the Spanish Parliament passed the first law on equality between men and women

  • As previous studies related to Twitter and political communication have shown, content analysis is the most suitable quantitative technique to determine and characterize the volume of tweets shared by the selected politicians (Valera Ordaz and López García, 2014; Cano-Orón and Llorca-Abad, 2017)

  • None of the politicians in the sample is featured on Twitter as a feminist, yet they all dealt with issues related to feminism at some point of the study period

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2007, the Spanish Parliament passed the first law on equality between men and women. Violence against women has been taken out of the private sphere and the gender perspective has been introduced into public opinion. The Marea Violeta, the Decidir nos Hace Libres platform and Femi­nis­mos Sol are examples of how feminist discourse began to be built publicly in 2011 around the 15M movement (Caravantes, 2012). In this context, different issues related to feminism have entered the political agenda. Violence against women is increasingly present in the news agenda of conventional media (Menéndez, 2014) and in social media. It is a wide and interesting topic on which politicians define their positions (González, 1979; Verge, 2006)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.