Estrous response and pregnancy percentages following use of a progesterone-based, split-time estrous synchronization treatment regimens in beef heifers

Abstract

Mean estrous response rate (%ERR) and pregnancy/AI percentages (%P/AI) were determined after imposing split-time AI (STAI) and fixed time AI (FTAI) following 14-d controlled internal drug release (CIDR)+PGF2α or 5-d Select Synch + CIDR regimens. In Experiment 1, 1152 heifers (five locations) were randomly assigned to 14- or 5-d and to 54 + 74- or 64 + 84-h STAI treatment combinations. Estrous detection patches were affixed at PGF2α administration (19 day after- and on day 5 at- CIDR removal for 14- and 5-d regimens, respectively), assessed at 54- or 64-h and again at 74- or 84-h after PGF2α. Heifers determined to be in estrus at respective times were inseminated and non-estrous heifers at 74- or 84-h were given GnRH and inseminated concomitantly. The %ERR between 54 + 74- and 64 + 84-h STAI combinations differed (73.2 % and 78.8 %, respectively; P < 0.05), but %P/AI did not. In Experiment 2, 2014 heifers (eight locations) were randomly assigned to 14- or 5-d regimens and were inseminated split-time (64+84-h combination, similar to Experiment 1) or at fixed time (72- or 56-h after PGF2α for 14- or 5-d regimens, respectively). There were differences (P < 0.01) between STAI and FTAI treatments for %ERR (81.3 % and 64.4 %) and %P/AI (61.2 % and 55.4 %). Estrous synchronization regimen by AI treatment interaction (P < 0.05) showed that the %ERR were 79.8 %, 82.6 %, 66.2 % and 62.8 % and the %P/AI were 58.9 %, 63.4 %, 56.5 % and 56.5 % (for 14-d/STAI, 5-d/STAI, 14-d/FTAI and 5-d/FTAI, respectively). In conclusion, the 5-d CIDR with 64+84-h STAI combination was the most effective because of the greater %P/AI when this regimen was imposed.