Abstract

Several areal rainfall estimation methods using rain gage and weather radar data are reviewed including: (1) Thiessen's and Kriging methods relying on rain gage measurements only; (2) the classical cumulative procedure after transformation of reflectivity measurements using a standard Z- R relationship for conventional radar measurements alone; and (3) the uniform calibration method (using a constant multiplicative factor or a nonlinear regression) and the simplified cokriging method (previously proposed by the authors) for rain gage-radar combinations. An objective procedure based on the definition of reference rainfall depths at ground level and a set of validation criteria is proposed to compare these methods. The methods have been applied to a sample of eleven daily rainfall events observed in the Montreal area by the McGill weather radar and the Environment Canada rain gage network. The results show that the methods taking into account the spatial variability of rainfall (kriging, simplified cokriging) work much better than more classical approaches. Furthermore, the optimal combination of radar and rain gage information through simplified cokriging leads to better results than each measurement system alone for six out of eleven cases (especially for those presenting high areal variability).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.