Abstract
SUMMARY Deforestation of tropical forest is serious problem around the world. In this study, we aimed to reveal peoples' potential preferences for sustainable forest management such as REDD+ scheme, focusing on a comparison of the attitudes of people in Malaysia to those of people in Japan, through choice experiment survey of the hypothetical choice behavior of consumer purchasing certified wood product. Choice experiment is one of stated preference methods. The results suggest that both the Malaysian and Japanese people are willing to pay a premium for certified wood product made from materials produced under the sustainable forest management as the REDD+ aimed at reducing CO2 emissions and preserving biodiversity. The two peoples shared a common concern about the environmental problem of deforestation, which could contribute to global warming and the destruction of biodiversity. Thus this study indicated the importance of REDD+ and its certification programme for future development of REDD+.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Sustainable Forest Management
People In Malaysia
Sustainable Management
Reducing CO2 Emissions
Wood Product
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
British Journal of Canadian Studies
Sep 1, 2003
The Southern African Forestry Journal
Jul 1, 1997
Oct 9, 2020
Forests
Jan 18, 2018
Forest Policy and Economics
Dec 1, 2012
Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen
Dec 1, 2003
Environmental Management
May 21, 2018
Forestry
Jan 1, 2012
Journal of Environmental Science and Economics
Feb 20, 2023
Jan 1, 2001
Journal of Sustainable Forestry
Oct 3, 2017
Land
Jul 29, 2022
South-east European forestry
Dec 18, 2015
JOURNAL OF THE GEOGRAPHICAL ASSOCIATION OF TANZANIA
Jul 6, 2021
International Forestry Review
Mar 1, 2006
International Forestry Review
International Forestry Review
Sep 1, 2023
International Forestry Review
Sep 1, 2023
International Forestry Review
Sep 1, 2023
International Forestry Review
Sep 1, 2023
International Forestry Review
Sep 1, 2023
International Forestry Review
Sep 1, 2023
International Forestry Review
Sep 1, 2023
International Forestry Review
Sep 1, 2023
International Forestry Review
Jun 1, 2023
International Forestry Review
Jun 1, 2023