Abstract
Due to climate change and energy security concerns, bioenergy products and systems are becoming increasingly important, and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) can provide a better understanding of their carbon efficiency. In this study, we used a cradle-to-grave LCA to analyze the carbon efficiency of a cottonwood-switchgrass agroforest system grown on agriculturally marginal soils on three sites established in 2009 in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley (LMAV). A complete carbon inventory was done for both the agroforestry bioenergy system and a control cropping system that rotated soybeans and grain sorghum. Three years after establishment, the cottonwood sequestered the highest amount of carbon in dead roots, live roots, and surface residues (3222 kg ha−1) and the switchgrass sequestered the highest amount of carbon in above-ground biomass (4233 kg ha−1). The maximum carbon was emitted (1733 kg ha−1) from the soybean/grain sorghum rotation production system. The carbon emission during production was not statistically different for the bioenergy crops. Carbon emission from both bioenergy crops were significantly different compared to traditional agricultural crops. At the end of the third growing season, cottonwood showed the best performance in the net (6.2) and gross (11.8) ratios of carbon balance. The gross ratio of carbon by switchgrass (11.6) was comparable to cottonwood, but the net ratio was approximately 50% (3.3). The net and gross ratios of carbon balance were positive for the control cropping system as well, 1.2 and 2.2 respectively. Carbon emission from the traditional agricultural production system was at least 234% higher compared to the dedicated bioenergy production system. It was evident that bioenergy crops provide a more environmentally efficient practice in terms of carbon balance than the traditional agricultural practice in the Lower Mississippi alluvial Valley.
Highlights
Emphasis on renewable energy has risen to a considerable level in the United States in recent years
After including carbon sequestered in harvested biomass (Figure 4b), we found that that cottonwood cottonwood and switchgrass switchgrass overlapped, overlapped, which which suggests suggests that that these these two two bioenergy bioenergy crops may not be statistically different than each other in terms of gross ratio of carbon balance
This study study answered answered aa critical critical question question related related to the carbon efficiency of of deriving derivingenergy energyfrom fromsuch suchbioenergy bioenergy projects
Summary
Emphasis on renewable energy has risen to a considerable level in the United States in recent years. This interest is primarily due to the fact that the domestic oil reserve is non-renewable and oil supply from foreign suppliers may become unstable in the future. The use of fossil fuel emits greenhouse gases (GHGs) that were out of the atmospheric cycle for millions of years which exacerbates climate change. Considerable attention has been placed on growing biomass for energy production because biofuel is a renewable resource and potentially provides a sustainable and dependable supply of energy. Biofuels are non-petroleum based fuels derived from a variety of biological sources [1,2], e.g., cellulosic biomass. In 2017, approximately 686 TWh of renewable energy was generated in the US [3], contributing 17% of the total energy generation at utility generation scale
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley
Terms Of Carbon Balance
Carbon In Above-ground Biomass
Bioenergy Crops
Life Cycle Assessment
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
One Earth
Dec 1, 2019
Biomass and Bioenergy
Dec 1, 2015
GCB Bioenergy
Jun 1, 2010
Biology and Fertility of Soils
Feb 1, 1996
Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America
Jul 1, 2011
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Apr 1, 2012
GCB Bioenergy
Jul 1, 2012
Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis
Jul 4, 2018
iScience
Feb 1, 2023
One Earth
Dec 1, 2021
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Jul 1, 2013
Biomass and Bioenergy
Jul 1, 2015
One Earth
Jul 1, 2020
International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology
Nov 26, 2010
Environmental Research Letters
Jun 1, 2013
Forests
Forests
Nov 27, 2023
Forests
Nov 27, 2023
Forests
Nov 27, 2023
Forests
Nov 27, 2023
Forests
Nov 27, 2023
Forests
Nov 27, 2023
Forests
Nov 26, 2023
Forests
Nov 26, 2023
Forests
Nov 26, 2023
Forests
Nov 26, 2023