Abstract
As one of the results in this article, I stated a connection between bulk causal structure and boundary entanglement in the AdS/CFT correspondence.
Highlights
Theorem 7 of the article followed by arguing that the boundary CFT needed a mutual information of order 1/G between R1 and R2 for the boundary CFT to reproduce processes that can occur in the bulk
We had to argue that the degrees of freedom G1 and G2 sitting in the spacetime region X1 and X2 did not assist in realizing the bulk process in the boundary
We handled this by exploiting the structure of quantum Markov states
Summary
The article defines two in-regions Ri, defined in equation 3.6. These two regions are spacelike separated and can be extended to a complete Cauchy slice of the boundary CFT. As one of the results in this article, I stated a connection between bulk causal structure and boundary entanglement in the AdS/CFT correspondence. This connection followed by relating results on the necessity of entanglement to perform certain distributed computations non-locally. At a technical level bringing these necessity of entanglement results in contact with AdS/CFT is challenging, and an error occurred in the published article.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
