Abstract

The right to education is indispensable in unlocking other substantive human rights and in ensuring full and equal participation of persons with disabilities in mainstream society. The cornerstone of Article 24 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities seeks to ensure access to inclusive education for persons with disabilities on an equal basis with others as well as the full development of human potential. Since the adoption of the Convention, there has been much theorising about inclusive education; however, there has been little focus on the meaning of equality in the context of the right to education for persons with disabilities. The capability approach, developed by Amartya Sen and further refined by Martha Nussbaum, focuses on ensuring equality and developing human potential. It is often viewed as a tool that can be used to overcome the limitations of traditional equality assessments in the educational sphere, which only measure resources and outcomes. This article explores whether the capability approach can offer new insights into the vision of educational equality contained in the Convention and how that vision can be implemented at the national level.

Highlights

  • The question ‘equality of what?’ is often posed during debates on political philosophy and interdisciplinary debates on distributive justice

  • The same question was posed by economist-philosopher Amartya Sen, who first introduced his theory of ‘basic capability equality’ in his Tanner Lectures (Sen, 1979, p. 218): I believe what is at issue is the interpretation of needs in the form of basic capabilities

  • This article proposes a four-part framework, detailing insights into the vision of educational equality contained in the Convention through focussing on ‘the what’; ‘the why’; ‘the who’ and ‘the how’ of inclusive education

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The question ‘equality of what?’ is often posed during debates on political philosophy and interdisciplinary debates on distributive justice. This article proposes a four-part framework, detailing insights into the vision of educational equality contained in the Convention through focussing on ‘the what’; ‘the why’; ‘the who’ and ‘the how’ of inclusive education. The second limb of the framework (‘the why’) draws on the underlying goals of inclusive education to outline the most relevant capabilities to be developed through inclusive education. The third limb of the framework (‘the who’) is drawn on to extract information on where to set the focus lens of inclusion This can reveal invaluable lessons regarding pedagogical and assessment processes. In section four of the article, a four-part framework is put forward, which outlines the vision of educational equality contained in Article 24 CRPD and highlights essential focal points for achieving inclusive education. The case study examples that are used to illustrate the translation of inclusive education into practice are drawn from a selection of secondary sources highlighting best practice in the field

The Capability Approach
The Goals of Inclusive Education
The Measures Required to Achieve Inclusion
Inclusive Education Viewed through the Lens of the Capability Approach
Capability Equality
The Capability Approach: A Complete Guide to CRPD Implementation?
Conclusion

Full Text

Published Version
Open DOI Link

Get access to 115M+ research papers

Discover from 40M+ Open access, 2M+ Pre-prints, 9.5M Topics and 32K+ Journals.

Sign Up Now! It's FREE

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call