Epidemiological Association Between Long-Term Fine Particulate Matter Exposure and Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Air pollution and particularly the fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is a major environmental risk factor of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Millions of untimely deaths every year have been reported because of it. The epidemiological literature has linked long-term exposure to PM2.5 and mortality rates of CVDs. This meta-analysis aims to synthesize the estimates of long-term PM2.5 exposure and CVDs. Based on the PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched up to October 2025. Random-effects model was used to pool HRs, and the heterogeneity was measured with the help of I2. Four studies were included in this meta-analysis. There was an increased risk of CVD with higher exposure to PM2.5 on a long-term basis (pooled HR=1.22, 95% CI: 1.06-1.41; p=0.006; I2=96%). Cardiovascular mortality did not show any significant association with PM2.5 exposure (pooled HR=1.00, 95% CI: 0.71-1.41; p=0.98; I2=29%). No significant difference was found between the PM2.5 exposure and ischemic heart disease (IHD) (pooled HR=1.65, 95% CI: 0.90-3.00; p=0.10; I2=95%). The same pattern was noted between the PM2.5 exposure and stroke (pooled HR=1.61, 95% CI: 0.96-2.68; p=0.07; I2=74%). The PM2.5 exposure is associated with high CVD in the long term. Results reveal the significance of establishing strict air-drome quality standards and targeted interventions to mitigate the risks in the areas of issues. More integrated studies are required to support our findings and fill the knowledge gap.
- Research Article
36
- 10.1053/j.ackd.2005.07.005
- Oct 1, 2005
- Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease
Cardiovascular Disease in Children with Chronic Kidney Disease
- Research Article
249
- 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.002
- Apr 12, 2007
- The American Journal of Cardiology
Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Persons with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Current Knowledge and Rationale for the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Trial
- Front Matter
- 10.1053/j.ackd.2011.01.002
- Mar 1, 2011
- Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease
World Kidney Day 2011: Protect Your Kidneys, Save Your Heart
- Abstract
192
- 10.1161/01.cir.0000013953.41667.09
- May 7, 2002
- Circulation
In patients with diabetes, a high priority must be given to modification of the major risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). There is growing evidence that control of these risk factors will reduce the likelihood of developing CVD and its complications in patients with diabetes.1 In clinical management of patients with diabetes, attention must be given to the following risk factors: smoking, hypertension, prothrombotic state, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and diabetic dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, overweight/obesity, physical inactivity, and adverse nutrition. Specific considerations of Writing Group IV will be reviewed. They will be discussed in light of current recommendations for management of risk factors in diabetes as presented by the American Diabetes Association (ADA), the American Heart Association (AHA), and the national education programs sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).2–11⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓ These recommendations are summarized in the Table. View this table: Table 1107395. Goals for Risk Factor Management in Patients With Diabetes In addition to being a cause of many forms of cancer and chronic lung disease, cigarette smoking is a major cardiovascular risk factor. When a smoking patient also has diabetes, this patient is doubly at risk for CVD. Thus, every effort must be made to convince patients with diabetes who smoke to give up the smoking habit. This need is strongly reinforced by a position statement from the ADA.10 Elevated blood pressure is a major independent risk factor for multiple cardiovascular end points: coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, chronic renal failure, and heart failure.11 Patients with diabetes have an increased prevalence of hypertension.12 Multiple factors undoubtedly contribute to hypertension in patients with diabetes, eg, obesity, insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, and renal disease. Systolic hypertension appears to be the main blood pressure–related risk factor in patients with diabetes.13 …
- Research Article
21
- 10.1161/circulationaha.109.895524
- Aug 31, 2009
- Circulation
Ambient particulate matter has been associated consistently with an increased risk for mortality largely due to cardiovascular diseases.1 Although the relative risk estimates from epidemiological studies are small, they apply to almost the entire population of the United States. Consequently, exposure to ambient particles produces considerable burden of disease, and its mitigation offers the benefit of improving life expectancy.2 Articles see pp 941 and 949 Over the past decade, research has substantiated the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms linking ambient particles to the cardiovascular system3,4 once it was noted that ambient air pollution elicits systemic inflammatory responses in the general population.5 An update of the American Heart Association statement on air pollution and cardiovascular disease3 is under way. Mechanisms considered for active and secondhand smoke as well as ambient air pollution are strikingly similar.4,6,7 They include progression of atherosclerotic plaques to vulnerable forms, prothrombotic states, endothelial dysfunction, and altered autonomic nervous system control (Figure). Increased systemic oxidative stress is considered the key mechanism responsible for most of these pathophysiological changes. Increased risks for cardiovascular disease in general and coronary artery disease in particular have been documented for active and secondhand smoke as well as ambient particulate matter. Deep venous thrombosis has been added to this list recently.8 Figure. Overview on pathomechanism linking ambient air pollution,4 secondhand smoke,7 and active smoking to acute coronary syndromes. Nevertheless, the public health relevance of particulate matter in the light of the smoking literature remains hotly debated. Smokers are exposed to considerably higher cumulative doses of particulate matter than the general nonsmoking population. Mortality due to low doses of ambient particles may be considered counterintuitive compared with doses of particles tolerated by smoking individuals. A systematic assessment of the exposure-response function ranging from low doses of inhaled particles …
- Front Matter
2
- 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.08.039
- Aug 28, 2016
- Atherosclerosis
Early interventions for optimal control of prediabetes and diabetes: Critical to prevent cardiovascular disease?
- Research Article
- 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz748.0326
- Oct 1, 2019
- European Heart Journal
Background Serum uric acid (SUA) is increasingly recognised as an important predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and total mortality. However, the levels of SUA that discriminate across the different strata of risk for CVD and total mortality remain unknown, complicating the identification of subjects at high or low mortality risk for SUA in clinical practice. Purpose In this study we used a large Italian population comprising >3ehz748.0326 subjects to assess the threshold of SUA that increases the risk of total and CVD mortality. Methods The URic Acid Right for heArt Health (URRAH) study is a regional-basis multicentre cohort study which collected data from prospective studies and databases from different hypertension centres, including subjects with at least one measure of SUA and a follow-up of about 20 years. Total mortality was defined as mortality for any causes, cardiovascular mortality as death due to fatal myocardial infraction, stroke or heart failure. Multivariate dichotomic logistic and Cox regression models were used to confirm the relationship between SUA and mortality status both from cardiovascular and any causes, while ROC curves were used to identify the threshold of SUA that better discriminated people at higher or lower mortality risk. Results A total of 22.275 subjects had SUA and mortality information. Logistic regression identified a direct and strong association between SUA and an increased risk of total (OR 1.176, 95% CI 1.127–1.227) and CVD (OR 1.147, 95% CI 1.093–1.203) mortality, independently of other CVD risk factors (age, BMI, LDL cholesterol, diagnosis of diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, alcohol consumption and smoking). Cox models confirmed the presence of an independent association between SUA and any causes (HR 1.123, 95% CI 1.090–1.567) and CVD (HR 1.124, 95% CI 1.081–1.169) mortality. ROC curve analysis identified a cut-off value od SUA [(4.79 mg/dL (95% CI 4.7–5.4 mg/dl)] able to discriminate total mortality status, and a different one [(5.60 mg/dL (95% CI 5.09–5.89 mg/dl)] able to identify CVD mortality status. Multivariate Cox analysis adjusted for confounders confirmed that subjects with SUA >4.79 mg/dl had a significantly higher total mortality (HR 1.293, 95% CI 1.181–1.416) compared to those with SUA <4.79 mg/dl, independently of covariables. Similarly, subjects with SUA >5.60 mg/dl had a significantly higher CVD mortality (HR 1.428, 95% CI 1.273–1.600) than those with SUA <5.60 mg/dl after adjustment for the same confounders. Conclusion Levels of SUA that increase the risk of total and CVD mortality are significantly lower than those commonly used for the definition of hyperuricemia in clinical practice. Our data provide the first large evidence of a level of “cardiovascular” SUA that might be used in clinical practice to identify subjects at greater risk of total and CVD mortality.
- Research Article
5
- 10.1161/01.cir.99.8.1109
- Mar 2, 1999
- Circulation
Poster presentations
- Research Article
1297
- 10.1161/cir.0000000000000228
- Aug 3, 2015
- Circulation
An Institute of Medicine report titled U.S. Health in International Perspective: Shorter Lives, Poorer Health documents the decline in the health status of Americans relative to people in other high-income countries, concluding that “Americans are dying and suffering from illness and injury at rates that are demonstrably unnecessary.”1 The report blames many factors, “adverse economic and social conditions” among them. In an editorial in Science discussing the findings of the Institute of Medicine report, Bayer et al2 call for a national commission on health “to address the social causes that have put the USA last among comparable nations.” Although mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the United States has been on a linear decline since the 1970s, the burden remains high. It accounted for 31.9% of deaths in 2010.3 There is general agreement that the decline is the result, in equal measure, of advances in prevention and advances in treatment. These advances in turn rest on dramatic successes in efforts to understand the biology of CVD that began in the late 1940s.4,5 It has been assumed that the steady downward trend in mortality will continue into the future as further breakthroughs in biological science lead to further advances in prevention and treatment. This view of the future may not be warranted. The prevalence of CVD in the United States is expected to rise 10% between 2010 and 2030.6 This change in the trajectory of cardiovascular burden is the result not only of an aging population but also of a dramatic rise over the past 25 years in obesity and the hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and physical inactivity that accompany weight gain. Although there is no consensus on the precise causes of the obesity epidemic, a dramatic change in the underlying biology of Americans is …
- Research Article
166
- 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.10.050
- Jan 29, 2012
- The American Journal of Cardiology
Body Mass Index, Playing Position, Race, and the Cardiovascular Mortality of Retired Professional Football Players
- Discussion
41
- 10.1161/01.hyp.35.3.e10
- Mar 1, 2000
- Hypertension
To the Editor: Recently, an update from the Framingham study could not find uric acid to be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease.1 While serum uric acid levels correlated significantly with the risk for cardiovascular events and mortality in women, this relationship became insignificant after factoring for 11 additional variables including hypertension, body mass index, and diuretic use.1 Both the authors1 and an accompanying editorial2 interpreted these findings as showing that uric acid is not a true risk factor for cardiovascular disease and that it should not be routinely measured to assess cardiovascular risk. The careful analysis of the Framingham study is to be commended, but one must be cautious in the interpretation of the findings. While some epidemiologic studies such as the current one have not been able to show uric acid to be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, other studies using multivariate analyses3 4 5 6 came to an opposite conclusion. Another recently completed study, the Worksite,7 also found uric acid to be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events and mortality, especially in women. One might look for subtle explanations to account for the differences in these various studies, as Culleton et al1 have attempted, but most of the studies examined the very same variables. A more central issue is whether one should interpret the finding that a risk factor is not statistically independent to mean that it should not be considered biologically important. We would argue that this is not true in several situations. First, if the risk factors are causally linked, then one may not be able to show that they are independent of each other. For example, although smoking is a risk factor for mortality, it might no longer be independent if it is …
- Research Article
464
- 10.1038/ki.2010.383
- Jan 1, 2011
- Kidney International
Rapid fluid removal during dialysis is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality
- Research Article
- 10.1161/cir.0000000000000369
- Mar 1, 2016
- Circulation
<i>Circulation</i> : Clinical Summaries
- Research Article
76
- 10.1161/jaha.119.014686
- Jan 28, 2020
- Journal of the American Heart Association
BackgroundFrailty is associated with higher mortality in individuals at high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. We hypothesize that frailty is a more important prognostic factor than CVD risk factors and aim to determine the prognostic value of a cumulative deficit frailty index in patients with or at high risk for CVD.Methods and ResultsWe conducted an individual‐level pooled analysis of participants with or at risk for CVD, recruited in 14 multicenter clinical trials. The cumulative deficit index was calculated as the proportion of 26 deficits exhibited. Individuals were categorized as nonfrail, prefrail, or frail if they had indexes of ≤0.1, >0.1 to 0.21, or >0.21, respectively. CVD risk was assessed using the Framingham score. Outcomes included CVD event (new or recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure) and mortality. We studied 154 696 patients (mean age, 70.8 years; 63% men) with median follow‐up of 3.2 years. There were 17 535 CVD events and 15 067 deaths. The frail group (n=13 872) had higher risk of a CVD event (incidence rate ratio, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.85–2.08), all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.79–2.03), and CVD mortality (hazard ratio, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.77–2.05) than the nonfrail group (n=101 343). Associations remained unchanged after adjusting for CVD risk factors. The index statistically outperformed the Framingham score in its ability to discriminate CVD events (C‐statistic, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.60–0.61] versus 0.58 [95% CI, 0.57–0.58], respectively; P<0.001).ConclusionsIn individuals with or at high risk of developing CVD, the cumulative deficit index is associated with increased CVD events and mortality, independent of CVD risk factors, and adds incremental prognostic value.
- Research Article
20
- 10.2217/epi-2017-0008
- Feb 17, 2017
- Epigenomics
Air pollution and in utero programming of poor fetal growth.
- Ask R Discovery
- Chat PDF
AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.