Ependymoma: Advances in Systems Treatment Strategies.

PARP inhibitor and chemotherapy combination trials for the treatment of advanced malignancies: does a development pathway forward exist?

Research Highlights

Introduction: Alterations in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes are observed in up to 60% of biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients. Patients with advanced/metastatic BTC have few therapeutic options, so there is a demand for the development of new and innovative treatment approaches. The use of poly-adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis), either as a monotherapy or in combination, is being extensively studied in clinical trials. Areas Covered: This review examines the targeting of the DDR pathway with PARPis as a potential novel treatment option for the management of BTCs. The rationale behind the use of PARPis and current clinical experience is discussed. Moreover, further insights into potential future directions concerning the applicability of PARPis in the treatment of BTCs are proposed. Expert Opinion: Prospective clinical data with PARPis in the treatment of BTCs are limited. The potential combination of PARPis and IDH1 inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical trials is interesting because of the potential synergistic preclinical data. There are other possible combinations including those drugs that target the angiogenesis or STAT3 pathways. An enhanced understanding of acquired resistance to PARPis is necessary to progress the use of these agents in clinical trials.

PARP and ABCB1 (MDR1) inhibitor treatment of ovarian cancer cell lines and PDX models demonstrate no synergistic effect (244)

The use of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors has recently increased as a result of demonstrating their superior efficacy compared to traditional chemotherapy in various cancer subtypes in many preclinical studies and clinical trials. A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of PARP and their underlying foci that can be used as screening markers for potential new therapeutic options would aid rational treatment strategies and improve long-term patient outcomes. The available data on acute leukemia suggest potential windows for effective treatment of PARPi in disease subgroups. In this review, we summarize the current advances in the most common PARP-based adjuvant therapies and combination strategies for the treatment of acute leukemia and discuss the future prospects and challenges of therapy with PARP inhibitors. We also discuss reports describing an increased risk of cancer treatment in patients receiving PARP inhibitors for solid tumors. The research material were publications, the search was carried out using a combination of keywords such as: "PARP inhibitor", "acute leukemia", "therapy", "PARP clinical trials". The first step was to find relevant publications from the last 15 years. The second step was to review the publications found. Studies have shown that PARP inhibitors play an increasing role in the treatment of leukemia. In addition, focusing research efforts on identifying the most effective drug combinations and sequences could help to further shape the role of PARPi in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Background: Two poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are currently FDA-approved for the treatment of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in carriers of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2). This study explores the clinical outcomes of MBC patients treated with a PARPi. Methods: In this retrospective study, we included MBC patients treated with a PARPi between January 2017 and February 2022 at Mayo Clinic (Minnesota, Arizona, Florida, and Mayo Clinic Health Systems). We used the Kaplan Meier method to estimate the time-to-treatment-failure (TTF) and the log-rank test to compare different subsets. In addition, predictors of TTF were identified in a multivariate cox-proportional hazard regression model, including age at PARPi initiation, race, ethnicity, histology, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 expression of the tumor, the number of prior therapies, type of PARPi, and PV carrier status (germline BRCA1/2 or PALB2 vs. somatic BRCA1/2 vs. other). Results: Sixty-five patients treated with PARPi (olaparib: 51; talazoparib: 14) were included in the final analysis. Fifty-five patients were carriers of germline PVs in BRCA1 (n=24, 37%), BRCA2 (n=27, 42%) or PALB2 (n=4, 6%), whereas ten patients (15%) had no germline PVs but the tumor had a somatic mutation in the homologous recombination-related (HRR) genes (7 in BRCA1/2, 2 in ATM, and 1 in CDKN2A and CDH1). At the data cutoff, 48 (74%) patients had discontinued PARPi due to progression or death. Fifteen (23%) patients required a dose reduction due to side effects. Occurrence of grade ≥ 3 side effects: anemia in 8, fatigue in 4, neutropenia in 2, and thrombocytopenia in 2 patients. Eight (15.7%) patients in the olaparib group and seven (50%) patients in the talazoparib group required a dose reduction for side effects. No patient on olaparib required drug discontinuation due to side effects, whereas two patients on talazoparib were switched to olaparib due to cytopenias and could tolerate olaparib. Median TTF in the overall population was 8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.4 – 9.6), and there was no difference (p=0.64) in TTF between the olaparib and talazoparib groups. Median TTF in the germline BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 PV carriers were 7, 8, and 11 months, respectively (p=0.57). Among patients with somatic BRCA1/2 mutations, the median TTF was 4 months. Numerically, patients with HER2-positive tumors (n=8) had a shorter TTF compared to HER2-negative tumors (Median TTF: 4 vs. 8 months, p=0.098). No significant difference in TTF was observed by ER or PR status of the tumor, age at initiation of PARPi, the number of prior therapies, and prior use of platinum-based chemotherapy or CDK4/6 inhibitors. In multivariate analysis, HER2 positivity (hazard ratio [HR]: 8.0, 95% CI: 2.2 – 29.4, p=0.002), somatic BRCA1/2 mutations (HR: 7.6, 95% CI: 1.2 – 50.0, p=0.03) and somatic mutations in other HRR genes (HR: 19.1, 95% CI: 3.1 – 118.6, p=0.002) were associated with worse TTF. Conclusions: In the real world, PARPi were well-tolerated with promising time-to-treatment-failure (TTF) benefits comparable to data from clinical trials. Notably, relatively shorter TTF was observed in patients with somatic BRCA1/2 and other HRR gene mutations and HER2-positive MBC. These findings improve our understanding of the role of PARPi in MBC and will help to guide treatment decisions with PARPi in the clinical setting. Citation Format: Nusrat Jahan, Jodi Taraba, Karthik V. Giridhar, Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, Amye J. Tevaarwerk, Elizabeth Cathcart-Rake, Ciara C. O’Sullivan, Prema Peethambaram, Timothy J. Hobday, Kathryn Ruddy, Lida A. Mina, Pooja Advani, Felipe Batalini, Matthew P. Goetz, Tufia C. Haddad, Fergus J. Couch, Siddhartha Yadav. Clinical outcomes of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi): the Mayo Clinic experience [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-22.

Ovarian cancer is a heterogeneous disease with complex molecular and genetic hallmarks. Benefitting from profound understanding of molecular mechanisms in ovarian cancer pathogenesis, novel targeted drugs have been actively explored in preclinical studies and clinical trials. Considered as one of the most potent and effective targeted therapies for the treatment of ovarian cancer, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) take advantages of synthetic lethality mechanisms to prevent DNA damage repair in cancer cells and cause their death, especially in cancers with BRCA mutations. Mounting evidence has indicated that the combination of PARPis with cytotoxic drugs or other targeted drugs has shown favorable synergistic effects. Excitingly, the antitumor activity of combination therapy of PARPis has been actively tested in multiple clinical trials and in-vitro or in-vivo experiments. In this review, we will briefly discuss the molecular mechanisms of PARPis combined with other therapeutic small-molecular compounds for the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Effective therapy for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Real-world clinical outcomes with poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors as second-line maintenance therapy in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer in the United States (353)

Locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer remains a challenge to treat. With emerging study results, it is important to interpret the available clinical data and apply the evidence offering the most effective treatment to the right patient. Poly(ADP Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are a new class of drug and their role in the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer is being established. To determine the efficacy, safety profile, and potential harms of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. The primary outcome of interest was overall survival; secondary outcomes included progression-free survival, tumour response rate, quality of life, and adverse events. On 8 June 2020, we searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE via OvidSP, Embase via OvidSP, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) search portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also searched proceedings from the major oncology conferences as well as scanned reference lists from eligible publications and contacted corresponding authors of trials for further information, where needed. We included randomised controlled trials on participants with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer comparing 1) chemotherapy in combination with PARP inhibitors, compared to the same chemotherapy without PARP inhibitors or 2) treatment with PARP inhibitors, compared to treatment with other chemotherapy. We included studies that reported on our primary outcome of overall survival and secondary outcomes including progression-free survival, tumour response rate, quality of life, and adverse events. We used standard methodological procedures defined by Cochrane. Summary statistics for the endpoints used hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival and progression-free survival, and odds ratios (OR) for response rate (RR) and toxicity. We identified 49 articles for qualitative synthesis, describing five randomised controlled trials that were included in the quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis). A sixth trial was assessed as eligible but had ended prematurely and no data were available for inclusion in our meta-analysis. Risk of bias was predominately low to unclear across all studies except in regards to performance bias (3/5 high risk) and detection bias for the outcomes of quality of life (2/2 high risk) and reporting of adverse events (3/5 high risk). High-certainty evidence shows there may be a small advantage in overall survival (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.00; 4 studies; 1435 patients). High-certainty evidence shows that PARP inhibitors offer an improvement in PFS in locally advanced/metastatic HER2-negative, BRCA germline mutated breast cancer patients (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.71; 5 studies; 1474 patients). There was no statistical heterogeneity for these outcomes. Subgroup analyses for PFS outcomes based on trial level data were performed for triple-negative breast cancer, hormone-positive and/or HER2-positive breast cancer, BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations, and patients who had received prior chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer or not. The subgroup analyses showed a persistent PFS benefit regardless of the subgroup chosen. Pooled analysis shows PARP inhibitors likely result in a moderate improvement in tumour response rate compared to other treatment arms (66.9% vs 48.9%; RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.54; 5 studies; 1185 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The most common adverse events reported across all five studies included neutropenia, anaemia and fatigue. Grade 3 or higher adverse events probably occur no less frequently in patients receiving PARP inhibitors (59.4% for PARP arm versus 64.5% for non-PARP arm, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.04; 5 studies; 1443 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Only two studies reported quality of life outcomes so this was not amenable to meta-analysis. However, both studies that did assess quality of life showed PARP inhibitors were superior compared to physician's choice of chemotherapy in terms of participant-reported outcomes. In people with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative, BRCA germline mutated breast cancer, PARP inhibitors offer an improvement in progression-free survival, and likely improve overall survival and tumour response rates. This systematic review provides evidence supporting the use of PARP inhibitors as part of the therapeutic strategy for breast cancer patients in this subgroup. The toxicity profile for PARP inhibitors is probably no worse than chemotherapy but more information is required regarding quality of life outcomes, highlighting the importance of collecting such data in future studies. Future studies should also be powered to detect clinically important differences in overall survival and could focus on the role of PARP inhibitors in other relevant breast cancer populations, including HER2-positive, BRCA-negative/homologous recombination repair-deficient and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PDL1) positive.

Recognizing the challenges faced by researchers and clinicians working in the field of cellular therapy, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health, established the Production Assistance for Cellular Therapies (PACT) program in 2003 and expanded it in 2010. The PACT program provides both clinical product manufacturing support that furthers the mission of NHLBI in the areas of cardiac, lung, and blood diseases and broad support of translational development across all disease areas to serve the entire cell therapy community. The program also provides access to expertise in project management, regulatory affairs, and quality assurance and control. Education initiatives include webinars, cell processing facility-hosted workshops, national workshops, and active participation and leadership within the cell therapy community through collaboration with other cell therapy organizations and academia. So far, over 650 PACT-manufactured cell therapy products have been administered in 32 clinical trials for a range of illnesses and diseases such as acute myocardial infarction, sickle cell disease, and graft-versus-host disease.

Update on afatinib-based combination regimens for the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

NCI First International Workshop on the Biology, Prevention, and Treatment of Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Report from the Committee on Treatment of Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Advancing together and moving forward: Combination gene and cellular immunotherapies