Accelerate Literature Icon
Want to do a literature review? Try our new Literature Review workflow

Envolvendo-se com a diferença. Temas multiperspectivistas na história soviética das ideias

  • TL;DR
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Similar Papers
TL;DR

This paper traces the development of a multiperspectivist epistemological approach in Soviet intellectual history, linking authors from Russian Cosmists to Lotman, and demonstrating how themes of decolonial critique and Eurocentrism evolved into an increasingly integrated framework within the Soviet semiosphere.

Abstract
Translate article icon Translate Article Star icon

ABSTRACT The goal of the present paper is to trace a line between different authors of the Soviet history of ideas in order to show how they can be seen as all contributing to the development of a new epistemological approach which I will call “multiperspectivist,” a notion elaborated to describe the epistemological approach of G. W. Leibniz. By analysing the decolonial critique of Eurocentrism and Eurocentric science, I will try to show how similar themes, albeit from a different origin and with different intent, can nonetheless be found within the “Soviet semiosphere.” In particular, I will trace a line from the Russian Cosmists to V. I. Vernadskij, to N. I. Konrad to Ju. M. Lotman, to show how the multiperspectivist themes were in each author elaborated, adapted to their research needs, and ultimately developed towards a more and more integrated approach.

Similar Papers
  • Book Chapter
  • 10.3366/edinburgh/9781399529938.003.0003
Scaping: Revolutionary Rhythmanalysis
  • Jul 31, 2024
  • Conor Heaney

This chapter begins to define the philosophical and political parameters and stakes around scaping, the name given to the mode or style of rhythmanalysis developed in this book, situating scaping in relation to, and distinguishing it from, other methodological, ontological, and epistemological approaches, and will seek to articulate an immanent rhythmanalysis through discussions of method, critique, ecology, cybernetics, aesthetics, decoloniality, and revolution. It will argue that a methodological and ontological emphasis on rhythm, process, and ecology offer new accounts of epistemology, ontology, but also of modes of social, political, and aesthetic transformation (which I will offer through a reading of Deleuze’s notions of counter-actualisation and dramatisation), drawing succour from Joseph Beuys’s idea of “social sculpture.” This chapter will conclude with a discussion of revolution in the work of Slavoj Žižek, engaging with Gerald Raunig’s recent work, and taking into account Sara Motta and Ricardo Sanín-Restrepo’s decolonial critiques, ultimately towards a rhythmic reading of revolution, which argues for a definition of revolution in terms of long-term projects comprising the navigation of repetition and difference in everyday cycles, and which requires, it will be argued, a conceptualisation of a key site of political struggle: everyday life.

Save Icon
Up Arrow
Open/Close
Notes

Save Important notes in documents

Highlight text to save as a note, or write notes directly

You can also access these Documents in Paperpal, our AI writing tool

Powered by our AI Writing Assistant