Abstract

The unlimited nitrogen (N) availability that has characterized crop production in the last few decades is accompanied by environmental burdens, including the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with fertilizer production, post-application nitrate (NO3–) pollution of water bodies, and emissions of reactive gaseous N forms into the atmosphere. Here, we quantified the environmental tradeoffs of replacing mineral N fertilizer with NO3– and ammonium (NH4+) originating from effluent water of aquaculture in a cucumber (Cucumis sativus) cultivation system. While the yield, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), and NO3– leaching were similar between the cucumbers fertilized and irrigated (fertigated) by aquaculture effluent water containing 100 mg of NO3–-N L–1 (AN), by aquaculture effluent water supplemented with NH4+ (AN+), or by tap water with NO3– and NH4+ added (FN+), there were significant differences in the nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions between the systems. The N2O emissions peaked after each irrigation event followed by an exponential decline. The cumulative N2O emissions were between 60 and 600 g N2O-N ha–1, smaller than predicted based on a fertilizer application rate of 600 kg N ha–1 and were in the order AN+ ≫ FN+ > AN.

Highlights

  • With the growing global population, worldwide food demand is increasing along with concerns about the environmental impact of food production.[1]

  • An additional benefit is that the use of effluent water for vegetable fertigation allows the recycling of otherwise wasted water for secondary crop production, increasing the water use efficiency (WUE) of the integrated system

  • Continuous depletion of the wild fish supply due to overfishing has led to an increase in aquaculture, including the use of recirculating aquaculture systems (RASs) around the world,[10] potentially ensuring an uninterrupted supply of effluent water for vegetable fertigation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With the growing global population, worldwide food demand is increasing along with concerns about the environmental impact of food production.[1]. In 2018, ∼9.4 × 108 Mg of fresh vegetables were produced globally on an area of ∼6.4 × 107 ha, and this production is predicted to expand further.[4] One promising method that can increase the sustainability of vegetable production is to integrate it with intensive fish production.[5,6] Integration of aquaculture and agriculture allows the recycling of nutrients excreted by fish due to nonefficient nutrient use (i.e., nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P)7), which otherwise require removal at a centralized wastewater treatment plant or are discharged into the environment, leading to contamination of surface and ground waters.[8,9] An additional benefit is that the use of effluent water for vegetable fertigation (fertilization through irrigation) allows the recycling of otherwise wasted water for secondary crop production, increasing the water use efficiency (WUE) of the integrated system This is especially appealing in semi-arid countries with limited water availability. Two major forms of N pollution from horticulture are N2O16 and NO3−.17 The NO3− leaches out of the root zone and contaminates groundwater and water bodies,[8] while N2O is the third major greenhouse gas (GHG) and the agent of ozone (O3) destruction in the stratosphere.[18]

Objectives
Methods
Results

Full Text

Published Version
Open DOI Link

Get access to 115M+ research papers

Discover from 40M+ Open access, 2M+ Pre-prints, 9.5M Topics and 32K+ Journals.

Sign Up Now! It's FREE

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call