Abstract

Question What environmental variables and plant-plant interactions affect mire bryophyte distribution and does the surrounding landscape with human disturbance play a role in the mire bryophyte distribution? Location Jinchuan mire, Northeast China. Methods We studied the spatial distribution of bryophytes in 100 1 × 1 m-quadrats in the mire. Spatial variables were simulated by analysis of the distance-based Moran’s eigenvector maps. Variation partitioning analysis was used to reveal the relative contribution of spatial and environmental variables to bryophytes. The relationship between environmental variables and bryophytes were tested by redundancy analysis. We used co-occurrence and niche overlap models to detect interactions among bryophytes. We also studied the influence of the surrounding landscape on the distribution of bryophytes in relation to water chemistry. Results The eight bryophytes occupying part of the mire had both a general distribution trend and a local spatial structure. Over 40% of the total variation in cover among bryophytes could be explained by spatial and environmental variables. In this fraction, the environmental variables explained 29.7% of the variation, of which only 4.5% was not spatially structured. Redundancy analysis showed the contribution of dwarf shrub cover, Na and P to the bryophyte distribution was relatively large. Concentration of Na and dwarf shrub cover decreased gradually from north to south, and contributed most to the variation in species composition along the first axis. The concentrations of P decreased from east to west, and contributed along the second axis. All the bryophyte species were spatially isolated but with large niche overlaps, indicating that the bryophyte community was structured by interspecific competition. Conclusions Sodium mainly originating from the volcanic hill and P from the paddy fields were the main environmental factors affecting the bryophyte distribution. Concentrations of Na and P showed spatial structure, and resulted in induced spatial dependence playing a major role in the spatial structure of the bryophyte community. Dwarf shrubs affected by nutrient distribution in the mire significantly influenced the bryophyte distribution in the mire. We conclude that the surrounding ecosystems had important influence on bryophyte distribution via nutrient influx. Furthermore, competitive interactions exacerbated the spatial separation of bryophytes.

Highlights

  • Mires, as peat accumulating ecosystems, play a critical role in the global carbon cycle by virtue of their enormous carbon storage (Potvin et al, 2015), which is attributed to slow decomposition in waterlogged and anoxic conditions (van Breemen, 1995)

  • According to the sizes of the eigenvectors, distance-based Moran’s eigenvector maps (dbMEM) can be divided into two scales: broad and fine scale, which represent global and local spatial structure, respectively (Borcard et al, 2011)

  • According to the sizes of the eigenvectors, dbMEMs can be divided into two scales: broad and fine, and represented the global and local spatial structures

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As peat accumulating ecosystems, play a critical role in the global carbon cycle by virtue of their enormous carbon storage (Potvin et al, 2015), which is attributed to slow decomposition in waterlogged and anoxic conditions (van Breemen, 1995). Mire water chemistry shows a strong relationship with pH and the availability of cations, usually Ca and/or Mg, which makes up the poor-rich vegetation gradient (Tahvanainen, 2004; Johnson et al, 2015). Minerotrophic mires receive water supply mainly from groundwater or surrounding ecosystems (Rydin and Jeglum, 2013). The surrounding landscape can supply macro-nutrients, mainly N and P, and create gradients of nutrients in minerotrophic mires (Bragazza and Gerdol, 2002; Tahvanainen et al, 2002). Surrounding landscapes can influence mire plant distribution and biodiversity by affecting the quantity and quality of water input (Moore and Wilmott, 1976), rainfall (Sjögren and Lamentowicz, 2008), humidity, and wind (Mitchell et al, 2001)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.