Environmental sustainability in occupational therapy: Insights from Greek occupational therapists

Is Occupational Therapy Adequately Meeting the Needs of People With Chronic Pain?

IntroductionClimate change threatens the environments in which person‐centred occupational therapy occurs. Environmental sustainability is directly linked with the health and wellbeing of current and future generations, presenting occupational therapists with a unique advocacy and activist role. As practitioners of the future, there is an urgent need to understand students' attitudes, perceptions of, and self‐perceived preparedness for, dealing with environmental determinants of health and intergenerational occupational and climate justice.MethodsA cross‐sectional exploratory descriptive survey collected United Kingdom (UK) based allied health professional students' attitudes, perceptions, and self‐perceived preparedness for advocating for environmental sustainability in the context of person‐centred care. The survey was distributed to 48 gatekeepers in UK institutions with approved allied health professional training programmes (44 offered occupational therapy); 62 occupational therapy students responded. Descriptive and non‐parametric inferential statistics were used to analyse quantitative data. Text and short answers were analysed qualitatively via inductive content analysis.Consumer and Community InvolvementThe study was co‐designed and implemented with MSc (pre‐registration) occupational therapy students.ResultsParticipants (94%) expressed concerns for climate change, with 84% feeling responsible for addressing environmental sustainability in health care. While 64.5% identified climate justice as a top priority, a perceived challenge emerged between person‐centred care and sustainability, with only 18% of participants feeling prepared for environmental sustainability in occupational therapy practice. Participants requested education on personal and professional sustainability practices, as well as collective action. Sharing personal climate change experiences, advocating with family and friends, and facilitating connections for collective action were highlighted as potentially transformative educational tools in this area.ConclusionOccupational therapy curricula should address environmental sustainability through pragmatic, critical, and ethical lenses to enhance students' preparedness for this advocacy and activist role. Reflection and continuous professional development for environmentally sustainable practices is recommended.PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYOccupational therapists believe that it is important to support people to participate in occupations that matter to them. However, the activities that some people choose to participate in may have negative effects on the environment and the planet. It is important to ensure that when occupational therapists support people in their choices of activities, this does not lead to unequal access to healthy and meaningful occupations of others, now or in the future. That is because occupational therapists also have a responsibility to prevent occupational injustice. Occupational therapy students are the professionals of the future, so it is important to include them in research about this topic. They need to develop skills that allow them to simultaneously make sure that they are delivering person‐centred care, which is not environmentally detrimental and that does not lead to occupational injustice. Making sure that occupational therapists provide person‐centred care while also managing risks of occupational injustice may be seen as a profession‐specific dilemma. In this study, occupational therapy students in the UK completed a survey about their feelings, views, and readiness for managing this dilemma. Results showed that most respondents are concerned about climate change, but do not feel that their occupational therapy education sufficiently prepared them to practise in an environmentally sustainable way. They were asked to propose ideas for addressing this issue, and the article discusses how occupational therapy curricula might be changed in accordance.

Spirituality has received more attention in recent decades from different health disciplines. Occupational Therapy (OT), as a health discipline, believes that all aspects of human experience, including physical, psychological, social, and spiritual, are considered essential aspects of health. OT supports the fact that incorporating spirituality can promote health, well-being, and quality of life. Various researchers have attempted to investigate and explain occupational therapists' views on spirituality. In Iran's OT curriculum, spirituality has not been incorporated directly. The purpose of this study is to acquire information about the knowledge and opinions of Iranian occupational therapists about spirituality. This is a cross-sectional exploratory descriptive survey study in which 125 occupational therapists participated through convenience sampling. Inclusion criteria were, namely (a) at least one-year clinical experience of OT, (b) being educated in Iran, and (c) working in Iran. The Occupational Therapy Assessment of Spirituality (OTAS) questionnaire was used for data collection. The answers to the quantitative questions were analyzed through descriptive statistics. Most of the participants believed that spirituality should be incorporated by occupational therapists, but more than half of the participants disagreed that formal education prepared them to pay any attention to spirituality in their practice. Analyzing qualitative data by frequencies of their repetitions, led to four categories and sixteen subcategories, accordingly. The fourcategories are (1)the barriers to applying spirituality in OT, (2)the need to acquire knowledge and apply spirituality in OT, (3)the benefits of incorporating spirituality for a client, and(4)the benefits of incorporating spirituality for the occupational therapist. The findings indicate thatacademic education has failed to prepare Iranian occupational therapists to meet spiritual needs of their clients. However, OTstend to get information about spiritualityfrom other sources and find it helpful for themselves and their clients. There are also barriers to applying spirituality; therefore, an educational package is needed to address these problems.

Background: Global health care is moving toward function, quality of life, and occupation. Occupational therapy (OT) has been the only profession using “occupation” as core intervention since inception. With advancements in intervention techniques, occupational therapists (OTs) need to ensure the continued use of “occupation” as core intervention type. Previous surveys were conducted to analyze the use of specific intervention types: occupation-based interventions (OBIs), creative activities, acute-hospital-based rehabilitation, and different interventions used in pediatric OT practice. However, information on OT practices and types of interventions used by Indian OTs versus global OTs is unavailable. Objectives: The objective of this study was to analyze differences, if any, in the OT practices and types of interventions frequently used in daily practice by Indian versus global OTs. Study Design: This was an online, survey-based, cross-sectional study. Methods: The Google Forms questionnaire link was sent to OTs on E-mail with electronic written informed consent from May 2020 to March 2021 using convenient sampling. The questionnaire included participant's demographics, 17 clinical practice areas, and 9 intervention types and factors influencing OT practice. Total 201 (84 Indian OTs and 117 global OTs) fulfilled the selection criteria: OTs with at least bachelor's degree and minimum 3 years of work experience. Results: Indian OT workforce showed significantly more male OTs than global OTs (31 [36.9%] vs. 11 [9.4%]; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.0236–0.2964]; P = 0.0001) and OTs with master's degree (56 [66.7%] vs. 41 [35.04%]; 95% CI: [0.1852–0.4480]; P = 0.0001). Global OTs have more OTs with additional qualifications in non-OT fields (58 [49.57%] vs. 27 [32.10%]; 95% CI: [−0.3088–−0.0406]; P = 0.013) and more OTDs (13 [11.11%] vs. 1 [1.23%]; 95% CI: [−0.1641–−0.0335]; P = 0.006) than Indian OTs. Indian OTs practiced significantly more in the private sector: clinic and hospital (52 [61.90%] vs. 40 [35.80%]; 95% CI: [0.1273–0.3947]; P = 0.0001), whereas global OTs practiced significantly more in the government sector (46 [39.31%] vs. 19 [22.61%]; 95% CI: [−0.2930–−0.0410); P = 0.0124). Among the organizational roles, Indian OTs work significantly more as consultants (50 [50.95%] vs. 35 [29.91%]; 95% CI: [0.0751–0.3457]; P = 0.0001) while global OTs work significantly more as managers (36 [30.76%] vs. 12 [14.28%]; 95% CI: [−0.2770–−0.0526]; P = 0.0069). Among patient population treated, Indian OTs majorly (54.76%) treat children (up to 15 years) but significantly more in “all age groups” (35 [41.67%] vs. 18 [15.38%]; 95% CI: [0.1388–0.3870]; P = 0.0001) while global OTs treat significantly more adults (21–65 years) (61 [52.13%] vs. 25 [29.76%]; 95% CI: [−0.3569– −0.0905]; P = 0.0015) and geriatric (>65 years) (50 [42.73%] vs. 17 [20.23%]; 95% CI: [−0.3492–0.1008]; P = 0.0008). Indian OTs practice significantly more in developmental disability rehabilitation (78 [92.85%] vs. 68 [58.11%]; 95% CI: [0.2424–0.4524]; P = 0.0001), ante- and postnatal women's care (15 [17.85%] vs. 3 [2.56%]; 95% CI: [0.0662–0.2396]; P = 0.00018), and hemophiliac rehabilitation (14 [16.67%] vs. 2 [1.70%]; 95% CI: [0.0666–0.2328]; P = 0.00012) areas of practice than global OTs. Indian OTs practice significantly more in clinic outpatient department (OPD) (62 [73.80%] vs. 55 [47%]; 95% CI: [0.1375–03985]; P = 0.0001), hospital OPD (40 [47.61%] vs. 27 [23.07%]; 95% CI: [0.1141–0.3767]; P = 0.0002), and inpatient (37 [44.04%] vs. 30 [25.64%]; 95% CI: [0.0516–0.3164]; P = 0.0006) while global OTs practice significantly more in natural environment settings (53 [45.29%] vs. 24 [28.57%]; 95% CI: [−0.2994–−0.0350]; P = 0.016). Most preferred types of interventions among both groups are relatively the same: client education, counseling, and consultation and interview; therapeutic relationships; and therapeutic use of self. Besides these, Indian OTs prefer performance skills training and adaptive interventions, while global OTs prefer activities as therapeutic media and OBIs over other types. Preventive interventions and advocacy were the least preferred types of intervention among each group. Despite these relative preferences, significant differences were found between groups with regard to number of OTs practicing these 5 types of interventions: client education, counseling, and consultation (46 [54.76%] vs. 47 [40.17%]; 95% CI: [0.0073–0.2845]; P = 0.04]; performance skills training (41 [48.80%] vs. 34 [29.05%]; 95% CI: [0.0626–0.3324]; P = 0.004); preventive intervention and health promotion (29 [34.5%] vs. 24 [20.51%]; 95% CI: [0.0148–0.308]; P = 0.026]; adaptive interventions (39 [46.42%] vs. 23 [19.65%]; 95% CI: [0.1390–0.3964]; P = 0.001]; and preparatory interventions: (35 [41.67%] vs. 28 [23.93%]; 95% CI: [0.0467–0.3081]; P = 0.0075). Conclusion: The study provides the current stand for preferences and practices of therapeutic interventions by OTs in India versus globally, thus aiding in repositioning of OT practice, focusing on core OT domains as well as providing a baseline for monitoring practice trends over time.

Occupational Therapy Is a Vital Member of the Interprofessional Team-Based Approach for the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Applying the 2022 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for Exercise, Rehabilitation, Diet, and Additional Integrative Interventions for Rheumatoid Arthritis.

History, Current Practice, and the Future of Wound Care for Occupational and Physical Therapists.

Official documents and professional policies are approved by the AOTA Representative Assembly and undergo scheduled review and approval by the Representative Assembly Coordinating Committee (RACC). These documents are used by the Association and its membership to guide education, practice, advocacy, and policy on behalf of the profession. The documents are a valuable resource for occupational therapy practitioners and provide a solid grounding in the profession for students, consumers, and external stakeholders.Items in bold are new for 2022 and are available in this supplement to the American Journal of Occupational Therapy. Official documents are periodically reviewed, and documents may be superseded by newer versions or rescinded. A complete list of the most current documents is available at https://www.aota.org/practice/practice-essentials/aota-official-documents.Guidance documents provide comprehensive perspective and guidance on topics that shape advancement of the profession and its future direction. ▪ Guidelines for Documentation of Occupational Therapy (2018)▪ Guidelines for Occupational Therapy Services in Early Intervention and Schools (2017)▪ Guidelines for Reentry Into the Field of Occupational Therapy (2020)▪ Guidelines for Supervision, Roles, and Responsibilities During the Delivery of Occupational Therapy Services (2020)▪ Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process, 4th Edition (2020)▪ The Practice of Occupational Therapy in Feeding, Eating, and Swallowing (2017)▪ A Descriptive Review of Occupational Therapy Education (2016)▪ Scholarship in Occupational Therapy (2022)Position statements present an official stance on the provision of services, practice of occupational therapy, or role of occupational therapy. They are developed in response to a professional issue, concern, or need. ▪ COE Academic Terminal Degree (2022)▪ Assistive Technology and Occupational Performance (2016)▪ Autism Spectrum Disorders Across the Life Course and Occupational Therapy Services (2022)▪ Cognition, Cognitive Rehabilitation, and Occupational Performance (2019)▪ Continuing Professional Development in Occupational Therapy (2016)▪ Driving and Community Mobility (2016)▪ Fieldwork Level II and Occupational Therapy Students (2018)▪ Importance of Collaborative Occupational Therapist-Occupational Therapy Assistant Intraprofessional Education in Occupational Therapy Curricula (2017)▪ Importance of Interprofessional Education for Occupational Therapy (2022)▪ Importance of Primary Care Education in Occupational Therapy Curricula (2017)▪ Inclusive Environments: Home, Work, Public Spaces, Technology, and Specialty Environments (2022)▪ Mental Health Promotion, Prevention, and Intervention in Occupational Therapy Practice (2017)▪ Occupational Therapy and Complementary Health Approaches and Integrative Health (2016)▪ Occupational Therapy Doctoral Capstone: Purpose and Value (2022)▪ Occupational Therapy Fieldwork Education: Value and Purpose (2022)▪ Occupational Therapy for Children and Youth Using Sensory Integration Theory and Methods in School-Based Practice (2015)▪ Occupational Therapy in the Promotion of Health and Well-Being (2019)▪ Occupational Therapy Scope of Practice (2021)▪ Occupational Therapy Services for Individuals Who Have Experienced Domestic Violence (2017)▪ Occupational Therapy Services in Facilitating Work Participation and Performance (2017)▪ Occupational Therapy Services in the Promotion of Mental Health and Well-Being (2016)▪ Occupational Therapy’s Commitment to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (2020)▪ Occupational Therapy’s Perspective on the Use of Environments and Contexts to Facilitate Health, Well-Being, and Participation in Occupations (2015)▪ Occupational Therapy’s Role in Case Management (2018)▪ Occupational Therapy’s Role in Medication Management (2017)▪ Occupational Therapy’s Role in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (2018)▪ Occupational Therapy’s Role With Chronic Conditions (2022)▪ Philosophical Base of Occupational Therapy (2017)▪ Philosophy of Occupational Therapy Education (2018)▪ Role of Occupational Therapy in End-of-Life Care (2016)▪ Role of Occupational Therapy in Pain Management (2021)▪ Physical Agents and Mechanical Modalities (2018)▪ Role of Occupational Therapy in Primary Care (2020)▪ Role of Occupational Therapy in Wound Management (2018)▪ Telehealth in Occupational Therapy (2018)▪ Value of Occupational Therapy Assistant Education to the Profession (2019)▪ Vestibular Impairment, Vestibular Rehabilitation, and Occupational Performance (2017)Professional standards describe and define minimal standards for practice, continued competence, and other professional behaviors. ▪ AOTA 2020 Code of Ethics▪ Standards for Continuing Competence (2021)▪ Standards of Practice for Occupational Therapy (2021)Societal statements are written in the form of public announcements and identify a societal issue of concern; state how the issue affects the participation of individuals, families, groups, or communities in society; and may offer action to be taken by individuals, families, groups, or communities. ▪ AOTA’s Societal Statement Denouncing Conversion “Therapy” (2022)▪ AOTA’s Societal Statement on Disaster Response and Risk Reduction (2017)▪ AOTA’s Societal Statement on Community Violence (2022)▪ AOTA’s Societal Statement on Gun Violence (2022)▪ AOTA’s Societal Statement on Health Disparities (2013)▪ AOTA’s Societal Statement on Health Literacy (2016)▪ AOTA’s Societal Statement on Livable Communities (2016)▪ AOTA’s Societal Statement on Stress, Trauma, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (2017)▪ AOTA’s Societal Statement on Youth Violence (2016)▪ Specialized Knowledge and Skills of Occupational Therapy Educators of the Future (2009)

This study aimed to determine the effect of interprofessional education (IPE) activities on professional level occupational and physical therapy student perception of their competency and their actual observed competency in interprofessional collaboration. The effect of three IPE activities embedded within occupational therapy and physical therapy curricula were measured. Significant changes were noted in the students’ perception of their interprofessional collaboration using the Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS) Revised tool, following each of the three activities. Analysis of the Interprofessional Collaborator Assessment Rubric (ICAR)-Modified revealed “expected” proficiency level with no significant difference between occupational and physical therapy students. The study found from a program evaluation perspective that IPE activities generate immediate positive changes, but longitudinal or cumulative development was not detected. This program evaluation also supports the need for an IPE assessment to measure and track longitudinal development of interprofessional collaborative competencies across the curriculum.

Official documents and professional policies are approved by the AOTA Representative Assembly and undergo scheduled review and approval by the Representative Assembly Coordinating Committee (RACC). These documents are used by the Association and its membership to guide education, practice, advocacy, and policy on behalf of the profession. The documents are a valuable resource for occupational therapy practitioners and provide a solid grounding in the profession for students, consumers, and external stakeholders.The Representative Assembly adopted the RACC Standard Operating Procedures, Attachment A, at the fall online meeting in November 2020. As a result of this motion, the types of official documents have been renamed and are categorized and described below.Items in bold are new for 2021 and are available in this supplement to the American Journal of Occupational Therapy. Official documents are periodically reviewed, and documents may be superseded by newer versions or rescinded. A complete list of the most current documents is available at https://www.aota.org.Guidance documents provide comprehensive perspective and guidance on topics that shape advancement of the profession and its future direction. Guidelines for Documentation of Occupational Therapy (2018)Guidelines for Occupational Therapy Services in Early Intervention and Schools (2017)Guidelines for Reentry Into the Field of Occupational Therapy (2020)Guidelines for Supervision, Roles, and Responsibilities During the Delivery of Occupational Therapy Services (2020)Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process, 4th Edition (2020)The Practice of Occupational Therapy in Feeding, Eating, and Swallowing (2017)A Descriptive Review of Occupational Therapy Education (2016)Scholarship in Occupational Therapy (2016)Position statements present an official stance on the provision of services, practice of occupational therapy, or role of occupational therapy. They are developed in response to a professional issue, concern, or need. Academic Terminal Degree (2017)Assistive Technology and Occupational PerformanceCognition, Cognitive Rehabilitation, and Occupational Performance (2019)Complex Environmental Modifications (2015)Continuing Professional Development in Occupational Therapy (2016)Driving and Community Mobility (2016)Fieldwork Level II and Occupational Therapy Students (2018)Importance of Collaborative Occupational Therapist-Occupational Therapy Assistant Intraprofessional Education in Occupational Therapy Curricula (2017)Importance of Interprofessional Education in Occupational Therapy Curricula (2015)Importance of Primary Care Education in Occupational Therapy Curricula (2017)Mental Health Promotion, Prevention, and Intervention in Occupational Therapy Practice (2017)Obesity and Occupational Therapy (2013)Occupational Therapy and Complementary Health Approaches and Integrative Health (2016)Occupational Therapy Fieldwork Education: Value and Purpose (2016)Occupational Therapy for Children and Youth Using Sensory Integration Theory and Methods in School-Based Practice (2015)Occupational Therapy in the Promotion of Health and Well-Being (2019)Occupational Therapy Scope of Practice (2021)Occupational Therapy Services for Individuals Who Have Experienced Domestic Violence (2017)Occupational Therapy Services in Facilitating Work Participation and Performance (2017)Occupational Therapy Services in the Promotion of Mental Health and Well-Being (2016)Occupational Therapy’s Commitment to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (2020)Occupational Therapy’s Perspective on the Use of Environments and Contexts to Facilitate Health, Well-Being, and Participation in Occupations (2015)Occupational Therapy’s Role in Case Management (2018)Occupational Therapy’s Role in Medication Management (2017)Occupational Therapy’s Role in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (2018)Philosophical Base of Occupational Therapy (2017)Philosophy of Occupational Therapy Education (2018)Role of Occupational Therapy in End-of-Life Care (2016)Role of Occupational Therapy in Pain Management (2021)Physical Agents and Mechanical Modalities (2018)Role of Occupational Therapy in Primary Care (2020)Role of Occupational Therapy in Wound Management (2018)Scope of Occupational Therapy Services for Individuals With An Autism Spectrum Disorder Across The Life Course (2015)Telehealth in Occupational Therapy (2018)Value of Occupational Therapy Assistant Education to the Profession (2019)Vestibular Impairment, Vestibular Rehabilitation, and Occupational Performance (2017)Professional standards describe and define minimal standards for practice, continued competence, and other professional behaviors. AOTA 2020 Code of EthicsStandards for Continuing Competence (2021)Standards of Practice for Occupational Therapy (2021)Societal statements are written in the form of public announcements and identify a societal issue of concern; state how the issue affects the participation of individuals, families, groups, or communities in society; and may offer action to be taken by individuals, families, groups, or communities. AOTA’s Societal Statement on Disaster Response and Risk Reduction (2017)AOTA’s Societal Statement on Health Disparities (2013)AOTA’s Societal Statement on Health Literacy (2016)AOTA’s Societal Statement on Livable Communities (2016)AOTA’s Societal Statement on Stress, Trauma, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (2017)AOTA’s Societal Statement on Youth Violence (2016)

Background This research study emerged from the on-going quest of a team of occupational therapists to demonstrate that a local occupational therapy practice: was meeting the needs of adults with learning disabilities; was effective and achieving the objectives of the employing organisation; and was complying with the expectations of the College of Occupational Therapists regarding evidence based practice. Purpose The purpose of this study was to seek and to generate evidence on which to evaluate and improve a local community based occupational therapy practice with adults with learning disabilities. Methods Action research methodology was used in which the local occupational therapists were engaged as co-researchers over three stages. Stage one: essential criteria for occupational therapy assessments for adults with learning disabilities were developed. No standardised assessments were identified that could meet all of these criteria. Stage two: perceptions of occupational therapy assessment were gathered from a sample group of adults with learning disabilities, their carers and other stakeholders. Stage three: changes were made to occupational therapy practice in response to the findings of stage two and in order to meet referral to treatment targets imposed by the employing organisation. Data were collected on the changes made to occupational therapy practice, and how they were implemented, through the use of action learning sets and questionnaires. The perceptions of a new sample of participants with learning disabilities and other relevant people involved, about the occupational therapy practice that they had received, were ascertained. Throughout the whole study, data were collected from multiple sources using interviews, questionnaires and co-researcher discussions and reflections. The primary method of data analysis was thematic, with some descriptive analysis. Data from different sources were triangulated to develop key findings. Findings The participants with learning disabilities were able to provide valuable insights about their perceptions of occupational therapy practice. There was evidence that occupational therapists provided occupation focussed assessments and interventions which had a positive effect on the occupational performance of adults with learning disabilities. The occupational therapists used professional reasoning in their assessments and interventions with adults with learning disabilities rather than a standardised, formulaic approach. This ensured a flexible, holistic and person-centred approach which worked in a dynamic community context. Occupational therapists, as a service, creatively adapted their practice in response to organisational demands whilst maintaining occupational therapy principles. Conclusions The practice-based evidence generated from this research study could be relevant and transferable for other occupational therapy services working with adults with learning disabilities and contributes to the occupational therapy body of evidence within this speciality.

Background: The provision of assistive devices (ADs) to enable function is a well-established component of occupational therapy (OT) practice. However, multiple client and therapist factors prevent the utilization of ADs in practice. Objectives: This study aimed to explore the utilization of ADs in OT practice in Tamil Nadu (TN). Study Design: The survey research design was used to conduct this study. A ten-item electronic survey was developed based on the research question. Methods: The survey was E-mailed to 295 occupational therapists in TN identified through convenience sampling. The survey link was also shared on four WhatsApp Messenger groups (Tamil Nadu Branch of All India Occupational Therapists' Association Official Group, OTist Group, Clinic OT, and Santosh Alumni) with many occupational therapists belonging to TN (snowball sampling). Data were collected between August 29, 2019, and September 20, 2019. Results: Thirty-five occupational therapists responded to the survey. Writing and eating utensils were the commonly prescribed ADs in TN OT practice. Client factors, cultural factors, lack of availability, cost, and therapists' skill may contribute to the limited usage of ADs in Indian OT practice. Innovating low-cost culturally acceptable ADs, educating stakeholders, and training practitioners on how to prescribe/utilize ADs in practice may mitigate the barriers related to ADs use. Conclusion: The usage of ADs in TN OT practice is limited. Multiple factors affect the utilization of ADs in the Indian context of practice. A multipronged approach focusing on innovative device development, advocacy, and skill development is needed to promote the utilization of ADs in Indian OT practice.

Few research articles have addressed the anatomical needs of entry-level occupational therapy students. Given this paucity of empirical evidence, there is a lack of knowledge regarding anatomical education in occupational therapy. This article will primarily serve as a retrospective look at the inclusion of anatomical education in the occupational therapy curriculum. Focusing on the historical inclusion is the first step to address the gap in existing knowledge. Examining the history of anatomy in occupational therapy provides an educational context for curricular developments and helps current anatomical educators understand the evolution of occupational therapy as a profession. Exploring the educational history also offers anatomy educators an identity, as significant contributors, in the training and preparedness of entry-level professionals while focusing on the ideals of occupational therapy. However, there is a critical need for empirical evidence of best teaching practices in occupational therapy and anatomical education. This manuscript provides a foundation and a starting point for further investigation into the anatomical competencies for entry-level occupational therapists.

Rehabilitation Research

Anatomy education is undergoing significant transformation. It is unknown whether changes are in accordance with occupational therapy (OT) practice needs. The purpose of this pilot study was to survey OT clinicians to determine their perspectives on the value of anatomy in OT curricula, and anatomical knowledge required for practice. In addition to demographics, the survey asked questions on the value of a standalone anatomy course, integration of anatomical content in other coursework, practice areas requiring anatomy knowledge, course content, teaching media recommendations, and their opinions regarding whether graduates have adequate anatomy knowledge for competent practice. Surveys were distributed to OT practitioners in the state of Arizona (n = 107). Response rate was 51% on electronic surveys, 29% on mailed surveys. All respondents recommended an anatomy course in OT curricula; 97% as a standalone course with integration of course content throughout the curriculum. The most recommended teaching method was cadaver dissection. Content areas identified as important to cover included skeletal, muscular, and nervous systems. Regions recommended were the upper limb, thorax/trunk, head and neck, and lower limb. Practice areas requiring anatomy knowledge included joint range of motion and strengthening treatment interventions, goniometry, muscle strength testing, assessing muscle tone, wheelchair assessment/prescription, orthotics, physical agent modalities, and activity adaptation. Eighty-one percent felt that entry-level practitioners had adequate knowledge for competent practice. This study supports inclusion of a separate anatomy course in OT curricula, continued use of cadavers, and the importance of including input from practicing clinicians when determining anatomy course content.

Digital green innovations are being implemented in manufacturing to help organizations achieve sustainability by adopting sustainable development practices (SDPC). However, little is known about the impact of the information management process (IMP) on organizations’ digital green innovation. To address this gap, we devised a multidimensional framework based on the resource-based view (RBV) theory that serves as a basis for sculpting how the IMP captured and sustained organizational digital green innovation via SDPCs. 533 respondents from big and medium-sized manufacturing businesses in China were surveyed, and data were analyzed using the structural equation modeling (SEM) approach. The study makes numerous significant findings. Firstly, the SDPC’s dimensions (environment, economic, and social) are considerably improved by the IMP’ dimensions (acquisition, dissemination, and application). Secondly, SDPC’s dimensions are critical for attaining organizations’ digital green innovation. Thirdly, SDPCs’ implementation mediates the linkage between the IMP and organizations’ digital green innovation. Our findings suggest that investing in and implementing cutting-edge technology and sustainable practices are critical for long-term success. Still, soft issues, such as organizational information management, are equally critical in today’s information-based economy. Finally, in light of the study findings, we present theoretical and managerial implications.