Abstract

The paper presents the results of a study of the practice of regulating the environmental aspects of the activities of coal mining companies in the world and in Russia, as well as in the largest coal region - the Kemerovo region - Kuzbass. The documents of coal mining enterprises were studied, the main key requirements of the local community for mining companies were formulated, a comparison was made of the leading foreign and Russian coal companies in the field of interaction with the local community.

Highlights

  • Modern society is faced with many challenges, which are accompanied by profound economic, political, socio-cultural changes

  • The standard categorizes a wide range of stakeholders as stakeholders, including: company employees and their families; regulatory bodies, including local authorities; owners and shareholders; suppliers, contractors and subcontractors; local community; non-governmental organizations (NGOs), etc

  • It should be noted that in large mining countries a special practice has developed to take into account the interests of the local population when carrying out mining operations and further land reclamation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Modern society is faced with many challenges, which are accompanied by profound economic, political, socio-cultural changes. The external social environment, in which modern coal mining companies have to work, is no exception. One of such active factors of the external environment is the local community - the inhabitants of those territories in which active mining is carried out. Relations between mining companies and the local community acquire a conflicting nature, which negatively affects both the tangible and intangible assets of the company, and the socio-economic and environmental situation in the areas of industrial mining. In 2014, Rachel Davis, Daniel Franks, experts from the Shift International Center for assessing the compliance of the business environment with the UN human rights requirements, prepared an analytical publication dedicated to assessing the costs incurred by extractive companies due to conflicts with local communities. For a world-class mining project, they can be as high as US $ 20 million per week of delay. [2]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.