Abstract

The multiple spatial and temporal parameters affecting cattle herd distribution and activity dynamics can significantly affect resource utilization but are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether current animal tracking technology and spatio-temporal analysis tools can be used to integrate multi-scale information on herd distribution patterns as a function of seasonal forage production, periods of the day, animal activity, and landscape features. Positional and activity information of 11 free-ranging cows within a 31-member herd was obtained at 5-min intervals by using GPS collars for 1 year within a 457-ha ranch in the semi-arid rangelands of South Texas. Forage biomass was calculated with satellite imagery. Spatial analysis of cattle distribution and landscape features was conducted with GIS.Herd spread was greatest during the growing season. Throughout the year, during midday, the herd showed smaller spread and greater use of shade patches than any other time of day. Cattle also aggregated under trees in winter, particularly during the night. There was no statistically significant overall pattern of seasonal changes in the use of water and supplemental feeding areas, but a trend toward highest use during the winter. However, significantly different diurnal patterns in the use of supplemental feed and water were observed within each season.This study found a strong influence of shade patches relative to the influence of water and supplemental feeding areas on the diurnal and seasonal movement patterns of cattle in shrub-dominated rangeland. Although this study used only 11 tracked cows in a 31-member herd, the results indicated that techniques such as seasonal and diurnal GPS tracking, GIS, and remote sensing data enable evaluation of multiple spatial and temporal dynamics of cattle distribution and activity patterns. The smaller spread during the dry winter season associated with the observed aggregation of individuals in water and supplemental feeding areas, may aid in determining the most critical times for providing supplemental resources and guide the allocation of those resources to areas not frequently used by cattle, thus stimulating the animals to visit unused sites during the non-growing season.

Highlights

  • Given the current critical status of habitat degradation and loss, species invasion, and global climate change, there has been great interest in more accurate, explicit studies identifying factors affecting species distribution (Ritchie et al 2009; Butt 2010)

  • Flexible and opportunistic nutritional and physiological strategies can be developed on the basis of this spatio-temporal variability, producing distinct spatial distribution patterns in wildlife and livestock, and in natural and managed settings (Scoones 1995; Seagle and McNaughton 1992; Parker et al 2009)

  • The goal of this study was to determine whether current animal tracking technology (i.e., global positioning systems (GPS) collars and activity sensors) and spatiotemporal analysis tools (i.e., geographical information systems (GIS) and remote sensing) might be used to better understand how landscape characteristics affect the spatial distribution of a cattle herd in a semi-arid rangeland, as well as the factors influencing herd spread as a function of multiple temporal scales

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Given the current critical status of habitat degradation and loss, species invasion, and global climate change, there has been great interest in more accurate, explicit studies identifying factors affecting species distribution (Ritchie et al 2009; Butt 2010). Ungulates play essential roles in natural environments, where they shape the vegetation composition and structure and influence ecosystem function, and in managed settings, where they provide resources to human populations (Butt 2010; Goheen et al 2010). Flexible and opportunistic nutritional and physiological strategies can be developed on the basis of this spatio-temporal variability, producing distinct spatial distribution patterns in wildlife and livestock, and in natural and managed settings (Scoones 1995; Seagle and McNaughton 1992; Parker et al 2009). The activities and spatial distribution of large herbivores are influenced by environmental conditions and processes occurring at different scales, and their activities and distribution can affect patterns of ecosystem structure and function (Goheen et al 2010)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.