Abstract

This study assessed the environmental impacts and economic feasibility of generating heat using wood-briquettes (WBs), and heat and electricity using torrefied-wood-briquettes (TWBs). WBs and TWBs were manufactured from forest residues using portable systems and delivered to either residential consumers or power plants in the United States. An integrated cradle-to-grave life-cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) approach was used to quantify environmental impacts and minimum-selling prices (MSPs) of heat and electricity, respectively. Results illustrated that 82% and 59% of the cradle-to-grave global warming (GW) impact of producing heat resulted from the feedstock preparation in WBs and torrefaction in TWBs, respectively. About 46–54% of total cost in the production of heat were from labor and capital costs only. The GW impact of electricity production with TWBs was dominated by the torrefaction process (48% contribution). Capital cost (50%) was a major contributor to the total cost of electricity production using TWBs. The GW impacts of producing heat were 7–37 gCO₂eq/MJ for WBs, and 14–51 gCO₂eq/MJ for TWBs, whereas producing electricity using TWBs was 146–443 gCO₂eq/kWhe. MSPs of generating heat from WBs and TWBs were €1.09–€1.73 and €1.60–€2.26/MJ, respectively, whereas the MSP of electricity from TWBs was €20–€25/kWhe. Considering carbon and pile-burn credits, MSPs of heat and electricity were reduced by 60–90% compared to the base-case.

Highlights

  • The Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) emphasized the urgency to reduce greenhouse gasses to mitigate climate change [1]

  • wood briquettes (WBs) (WBheat ) and torrefied wood briquettes (TWBs) (TWBheat ), and 1 kWh of electricity (kWhe) generated from TWBs at a powerplant (TWBelectricity )

  • The total global warming (GW) impact per 1 MJ useful heat generated at a wood stove using WBs and TWBs was about 9 and 16 g CO2 eq, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) emphasized the urgency to reduce greenhouse gasses to mitigate climate change [1]. Fossilbased energy production often ignores the externalities costs borne by society such as greenhouse gas (GHG) induced climate change, air quality problems or air pollution, issues around fossil fuel extraction, production, and consumption [2,3]. Energy production from relatively low-cost fossil fuel sources continues to drive GHG emissions globally despite the widespread availability of plant-based biomass in various forms [2,3,4,5,6]. It has become increasingly imperative, with a growing global population, that alternative clean and sustainable energy sources are needed to be able to address environmental issues including climate change.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.