Abstract
Fins, referred to as extended surfaces, play a crucial role in enhancing heat transfer across various industrial sectors. They achieve this by increasing the surface area available for convective heat transfer. These widespread applications span fields such as energy production, mechanical engineering, surface studies, heat recovery processes, and chemical engineering. The broad utility of fins has prompted researchers to enhance their precision through diverse methods, including numerical, experimental, and analytical approaches. Motivated by these practical applications, this study undertakes a theoretical investigation to analyze the effects of varying fin heights on the behavior of a hybrid hydromagnetic nanofluid within a porous square enclosure. The study explores three distinct cases. In the first case, fixed-height heat fins are attached to the upper and lower walls. In the second case, the fin attached to the upper wall remains static, while those on the lower wall are extended from 0.25L to 0.5L. Conversely, the third case involves extending the height of the upper fin from 0.25L to 0.5L. The in-house MATLAB code, coupled with a finite difference method, is employed to solve the governing equations, and its reliability is confirmed through comparison with prior publications. Thorough numerical simulations are conducted, encompassing control parameters such as thermal radiation, Rayleigh number, nanoparticle volume fraction, Hartmann number, heat generation/absorption, and Darcy number. The numerical results are visually presented through streamlines, isotherms, and average Nusselt number plots, elucidating the impact of these parameters across a range of scenarios. It is noticed that case 3 exposes a 96.06% higher heat transfer rate than case 2 with higher values of volume fraction and Rayleigh number. In all three cases, the Rayleigh number and Hartmann number cause a reduction in the entropy generation. For a higher Rayleigh number, employing a hybrid nanofluid containing a volume fraction of 5% causes a 110.41% reduction in heat transfer for the case involving bottom fin height compared to case 1. Similarly, extending the top fin leads to a heat transfer reduction of 100.41%.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.