Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyze the organization of workers of the South Pacific Railway Company of Mexico during the country’s initial constitutional decade. During this period, the management of their rights vacillated between mutualism and institutionalization. This analysis posits that workers in post-revolutionary Mexico did not immediately adhere to the provisions outlined in constitutional Article 123. Instead, these workers amalgamated mutualistic and normative elements as a negotiation tool in their conflicts against the capital. Through a review of bibliographic and documentary sources, this study reconstructs three distinct labor conflicts occurring in 1917, 1923, and 1927. I argue that the observed oscillation between mutualism and institutionalization was a consequence of various intertwined factors, of which the most relevant are the prevalence of general mutualism in Sonora, the legal ambiguity regarding the jurisdiction to arbitrate railway conflicts between local and federal authorities, and the influence of local political clientelism.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.