Abstract

This paper proposes a revised definition for the entanglement cost of a quantum channel $\mathcal{N}$. In particular, it is defined here to be the smallest rate at which entanglement is required, in addition to free classical communication, in order to simulate $n$ calls to $\mathcal{N}$, such that the most general discriminator cannot distinguish the $n$ calls to $\mathcal{N}$ from the simulation. The most general discriminator is one who tests the channels in a sequential manner, one after the other, and this discriminator is known as a quantum tester [Chiribella et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, 060401 (2008)] or one who is implementing a quantum co-strategy [Gutoski et al., Symp. Th. Comp., 565 (2007)]. As such, the proposed revised definition of entanglement cost of a quantum channel leads to a rate that cannot be smaller than the previous notion of a channel's entanglement cost [Berta et al., IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 59, 6779 (2013)], in which the discriminator is limited to distinguishing parallel uses of the channel from the simulation. Under this revised notion, I prove that the entanglement cost of certain teleportation-simulable channels is equal to the entanglement cost of their underlying resource states. Then I find single-letter formulas for the entanglement cost of some fundamental channel models, including dephasing, erasure, three-dimensional Werner--Holevo channels, epolarizing channels (complements of depolarizing channels), as well as single-mode pure-loss and pure-amplifier bosonic Gaussian channels. These examples demonstrate that the resource theory of entanglement for quantum channels is not reversible. Finally, I discuss how to generalize the basic notions to arbitrary resource theories.

Highlights

  • The resource theory of entanglement [1] has been one of the richest contributions to quantum information theory [2,3,4,5], and these days, the seminal ideas coming from it are influencing diverse areas of physics [6]

  • A fundamental question in entanglement theory is to determine the smallest rate at which Bell states are needed, along with the assistance of free classical communication, in order to generate n copies of an arbitrary bipartite state ρAB reliably [1]

  • The optimal rate is known as the entanglement cost of ρAB [1], and a formal expression is known for this quantity in terms of a regularization of the entanglement of formation [7]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The resource theory of entanglement [1] has been one of the richest contributions to quantum information theory [2,3,4,5], and these days, the seminal ideas coming from it are influencing diverse areas of physics [6]. The authors of [19] defined the entanglement cost of a quantum channel NA→B as the smallest rate at which entanglement is required, in addition to the assistance of free classical communication, in order to simulate n uses of NA→B Key to their definition of entanglement cost is the particular notion of simulation considered. I propose a new definition for the entanglement cost of a channel NA→B, such that it is the smallest rate at which ebits are needed, along with the assistance of free classical communication, in order to simulate n uses of NA→B, in such a way that a discriminator performing the most stringest test, as described above, cannot distinguish the simulation from n actual calls of NA→B (Section II B).

NOTIONS OF QUANTUM CHANNEL SIMULATION
Proposal for a revised notion of entanglement cost of a channel
LOCC monotonicity of the entanglement cost
Parallel tests as a special case of sequential tests
Upper bound on the entanglement cost of teleportation-simulable channels
EXAMPLES
Erasure channels
Dephasing channels
Werner–Holevo channels
BOSONIC GAUSSIAN CHANNELS 1
On the definition of entanglement cost for infinite-dimensional channels
Lower bound on the entanglement cost of bosonic Gaussian channels
Entanglement cost of pure-loss and pure-amplifier channels
EXTENSION TO OTHER RESOURCE THEORIES
CONCLUSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.