Translate 
Abstract
As Generative AI (GenAI) technologies increasingly permeate academic research, the assessment of the validity and reliability of AI-generated outputs has become essential. This article presents a comprehensive framework designed to evaluate the accuracy and consistency of GenAI content, emphasizing key components such as assessment criteria and evaluation methodologies. The framework incorporates both statistical methods and qualitative assessments to provide a holistic approach to evaluation. Furthermore, ethical considerations regarding authorship, intellectual property, and bias in AI outputs are examined, underscoring the need for transparent practices in scholarly communication. The article also discusses the evolving standards in AI research and the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in refining assessment frameworks. A call for further research is made to explore the long-term effects of GenAI on academic practices and to encourage active participation in framework development. Ultimately, this work aims to foster ongoing dialogue about the integration of GenAI in research, prompting scholars to consider how these technologies can enhance productivity while maintaining critical thinking and originality. By establishing robust evaluation practices, the academic community can navigate the complexities of GenAI responsibly and effectively.
Published Version
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
