Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in root canal instruments have led to lesser frequency of dentinal crack formation. Not many studies have been reported in literature that compare crack formation using instruments based on control memory (CM) and M wire technology. The study intended to evaluate and compare the prevalence of dentinal cracks formed by ProTaper Next (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), HyFlex CM (Coltene, Whaldent) and Wave One (Dentsply, Maillefer) reciprocating file systems at the apical and middle third of the mesiobuccal root canal of mandibular molars under scanning electron microscope (SEM). METHODS Forty-five extracted sound human mandibular molars were decoronated and mesial roots were retained followed by root canal instrumentation using ProTaper Next, HyFlex CM and WaveOne reciprocating files. Roots were then sectioned perpendicular to the long axis of teeth and viewed under scanning electron microscope to detect the presence of cracks. RESULTS ProTaper Next system produced more cracks compared with HyFlex and Wave One (P < 0.05) but there was no statistically significant difference between all the three groups. All the file systems showed more incidences of cracks in the apical third compared to middle third. CONCLUSIONS All the NiTi instruments produced cracks and the highest incidence of cracks was seen in the apical third compared to middle third region. KEY WORDS Dentinal Cracks, HyFlex CM, ProTaper Next, Root Canal, Wave One
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
