English

discussed among the widerpublic. Pressure points in-cluding climate change,waterandfoodavailability,price surges for strategicraw materials, and peakingglobal oil supply are con-verging rapidly in an un-precedented manner. Thecurrent global patterns ofproduction and consump-tion are hitting the reallimitsofglobalecosystems.The global economy seems to be at a turningpoint where decisions are urgent while informa-tion is incomplete.The urgency of addressing issues of industrialmetabolism

A transition to Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) is an obligatory task to ensure food security for an anticipated nine billion people by 2050. Despite the significance that CSA through conservation agriculture (CA) in particular received, there has been an increase in disenchantment with the approach due to its intangible rigour. The sustainability of CSA remains shrouded in mystery. CA sustainability among smallholder communal farmers has remained untheorised. It is against this backdrop that the paper sought to assess the sustainability of CSA through Conservation farming by smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe through a cross-country multi-case study approach. This paper highlighted the limiting factors of agricultural production in Zimbabwe and critically examines conservation agriculture as a potential solution to address many of these challenges. The various dimensions of CA were examined to understand the factors that influence the spread of the technology across spatial and temporal contexts. The paper concluded that CA excludes marginal groups like child-headed households, widows and the chronically ill. Environmentally, CSA minimizes adverse externalities, preserves soils with favourable micro-climatic effects, and sequesters an amount of carbon that would otherwise be released into the atmosphere, thereby mitigating temperature changes. Therefore, CSA is environmentally sustainable but economically, institutionally and socially compromised. This study contributes to social science scholarship by addressing a theoretical gap in the sustainability of CA practice, especially among smallholder farmers, bringing to the fore inclusivity, social exclusion and multidimensionality in CSA practice and providing a nuanced, evidence-based comparative critique. Keywords: Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA), Conservation Agriculture (CA), Conservation, Sustainability

Climate-smart livestock production at landscape level in Kenya

BackgroundThe adoption of climate-smart agricultural (CSA) practices is expected to improve farmers’ adaptation to climate change and also increase yields while simultaneously curbing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This paper explores the determinants of smallholder farmers’ participation in GHG-emitting activities. It also estimates the impact of CSA activities on reducing GHG emissions.MethodsThe findings are based on survey data obtained from 350 smallholder farmers in the East Gonja district of Northern Ghana. We adopted the generalized Poisson regression model in identifying factors influencing farmers’ participation in the GHG emission practices and inverse-probability-weighted regression adjustment (IPWRA) to estimate the impact of CSA adoption on GHG emissions.ResultsMost farming households engaged in at least one emission activity. The findings of the generalized Poisson model found that wealthier households, higher education, and households with access to extension services were less likely to participate in GHG emission activities. There was also evidence that CSA adoption significantly reduces GHG emissions.ConclusionAdvocacy in CSA adoption could be a necessary condition for environmental protection through the reduction of GHG emissions.

The climate challenges confronting agriculture are multiple, interconnected and multi-scaled. Agriculture is a source of increasing greenhouse gas emissions, but it is also vulnerable to climate change impacts. Adopting resilient approaches in the agricultural industry can help to contribute to both climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation. Climate-smart agriculture has emerged as a solution to address the multiple challenges of climate change and food security by sustainably increasing productivity, enhancing resilience and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. To date, there is limited scholarly evidence on what constitutes climate-smart agriculture, and how it is framed globally and practiced by smallholder farming communities. This research helps to bridge this gap by analysing the international discourse around climate-smart agriculture, and providing local empirical evidence derived from smallholder farming communities in the Philippines and Timor-Leste. At the broad level, this research aims to identify how climate-smart agriculture within community-based adaptation programs is contributing to the integration of mitigation and adaptation responses to climate change. Drawing from political ecology and climate change (adaptation and mitigation sciences) theories, the research explains how socio-institutional factors – inequality, unequal power relations and social injustice – influence climate-smart agriculture. The theoretical arguments are illustrated with empirical case studies of smallholder farmers and civil society organisations in the two case studies. Using mixed qualitative methods and descriptive analysis of over 150 semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions and participant observation, the research examines climate-smart agriculture practices across three broad categories: vulnerability of smallholder farmers (socioeconomic factors), synergistic relationships (adaptation, mitigation and food security) and governance (socio-institutional determinants). This research argues that mitigation and adaptation interventions are climate-smart for smallholder farmers when they directly address local climate risks, support a combination of adaptation, food security and livelihood strategies, and empower at-risk and marginalised populations. Results indicate that climate-smart agriculture in the Philippines and Timor-Leste are characterised and influenced by multiple socio-institutional factors. The increasing burden of loss and damage as a result of extreme climate events subject women to migration, increased discrimination, loss of customary rights to land, resource poverty and food insecurity. In terms of farming practices implemented by smallholder farmers, most adaptation actions were found to have corresponding positive mitigation, food security and livelihood co-benefits. At the community level, climate-smart interventions are highly location-specific, technically rigorous, involve knowledge-intensive processes, and are influenced by the finance and capacities of local farming communities and implementing partners. Furthermore, of relevance at the global level, this research finds that there is a growing divide between how developed and developing countries frame solutions to the impacts of climate change on agriculture despite agriculture featuring prominently in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change negotiations. Such a divide is limiting the recognition of solutions that integrate mitigation and adaptation opportunities. The insights from the Philippines and Timor-Leste make a compelling case for joint adaptation and mitigation actions in the agriculture sector across three broad policy frontiers. First, implementation of climate-smart agriculture will require participatory platforms that have a focus on livelihood and income opportunities for smallholder farmers. Second, policies and institutions on agriculture, agrarian reform, land use and climate change should mainstream both adaptation and mitigation outcomes using local plans and community level programs. Third, partnerships with community-based organisations and local governments are pivotal to coordinating services with farmers, providing an array of agriculture and climate services generating new knowledge and implementing climate-smart farming solutions.

Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) can sustainably increase productivity, improve resilience, and reduce emissions of greenhouse gases from agricultural systems. The current study aimed to establish the existing knowledge, attitude, and practice of CSA among smallholder farmers in the Isingiro District. An exploratory survey was conducted to collect data from 126 farmers randomly selected from three Sub counties. Key informant interviews were conducted with three extension workers for more information. Data was analysed using Stata 14 to generate summary tables and the Chi-square test of independence. The results revealed a high level of knowledge about CSA among the farmers, with intercropping and crop rotation as the most popular (99%) whereas rainwater harvesting was least known (71.4%). Farmers’ knowledge about CSA was significantly related to different sources of information and knowledge (P<0.05). Farmers showed a positive attitude towards the use of CSA practices except for inorganic fertilisers with 45%. The dominantly used CSA practices were Intercropping (85.7%), mulching (75.4%) and the use of contour bunds (74.6%). Several limitations that hindered the adoption of CSA practices included limited finances, extension services, availability of CSA inputs, high prices of CSA inputs, price fluctuations and land scarcity, among others. The farmers’ awareness, attitude and practice of CSA were mainly shaped by their local knowledge with limited influence of technical knowledge. Furthermore, the practice of CSA among smallholder farmers is hampered by many limitations. Therefore, there is a need for policymakers to prioritise and enact pro-CSA-relevant policies that address the barriers hampering its adoption

Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) can sustainably increase productivity, improve resilience, and reduce emissions of greenhouse gases from agricultural systems. The current study aimed to establish the existing knowledge, attitude, and practice of CSA among smallholder farmers in the Isingiro District. An exploratory survey was conducted to collect data from 126 farmers randomly selected from three Sub counties. Key informant interviews were conducted with three extension workers for more information. Data was analysed using Stata 14 to generate summary tables and the Chi-square test of independence. The results revealed a high level of knowledge about CSA among the farmers, with intercropping and crop rotation as the most popular (99%) whereas rainwater harvesting was least known (71.4%). Farmers’ knowledge about CSA was significantly related to different sources of information and knowledge (P<0.05). Farmers showed a positive attitude towards the use of CSA practices except for inorganic fertilisers with 45%. The dominantly used CSA practices were Intercropping (85.7%), mulching (75.4%) and the use of contour bunds (74.6%). Several limitations that hindered the adoption of CSA practices included limited finances, extension services, availability of CSA inputs, high prices of CSA inputs, price fluctuations and land scarcity, among others. The farmers’ awareness, attitude and practice of CSA were mainly shaped by their local knowledge with limited influence of technical knowledge. Furthermore, the practice of CSA among smallholder farmers is hampered by many limitations. Therefore, there is a need for policymakers to prioritise and enact pro-CSA-relevant policies that address the barriers hampering its adoption

Participatory forest management has been globally studied and it has been argued that clearly defined boundaries for access of the community forest resources will lead to sustainable use of resources and enhanced sustainable livelihoods to the communities dependent on the forests for their survival. In contrast, however current studies indicate that while there are efforts to define spatial boundaries of resource use and the resource users within the community based forest management approaches, the definition of boundaries of resource use and resources users has proved more difficult, for instance when gathering relevant information and tools that can promote forest resource users partnerships,  engaging of different stakeholders, assisting local communities to organize, preparing for negotiations meetings, procedures, rules, logistics and equity considerations, negotiating for  the establishment of agreements and empowering  of the local communities. This book therefore provides a process that would guide the establishment of partnerships when establishing forest resources and resource users’ boundaries in order to enhance sustainable use of forest resources, mitigate conflicts and improve the livelihoods of communities depended on forests for their survival. Qualitative research design was employed in the book. All the forests involved in participatory forest management in Kenya namely: Keraite; Nyamweru, Arabuko-Sokoke Forest, Kakamega, Loita, and upper Imenti were selected for to provide information for writing the book. All the respondents were purposefully sampled from each category of interviewees namely: households living adjacent to the forest, various groups that are working in or with the communities in the management of the forest resources. Policy makers from government and a group of experts e.g. head of various government ministries and Non-Governmental organizations. To collect data semi-structured interviews were done for the respondents. All the data collected was analyzed through coding and grouping similar important ideas or phenomena from the research and then used for writing the book. It is explained in the book that functional partnerships, forest resources and resource user’s boundaries are needed for effective community participation in forest management. It is recommended that broad understanding of boundaries is a pre-requisite to ensure that community and other stakeholders appreciate resource use and the resource users within the community based forest management approaches so as to facilitate sustainable use of forest resources and enhanced community livelihoods of the forest dependent communities.

The National Natural Park Corales del Rosario y San Bernardo, located in the Caribbean Sea, is one of the most important parks in Colombia since it hosts high biological biodiversity, receives more tourists than any other natural park in the country and provides sustenance to several communities settled in and around it. However, lack of governance and incompatibility of incentives among authorities, communities and visitors threaten its conservation and sustainability. Using experimental economic games with fisherman communities, we tested different rules related with the management of natural resources in the protected area. In addition to standard rules of communication and external regulation, we tested a rule called co-management, in which we explored the complementarities between repeated communication and external non-coercive authority intervention. We also tested inter temporal effects where over extraction (by the group) in a round reduces the availability of resource for next round and, in consequence, increases effort and reduces benefits for fishers. Results confirmed the effectiveness of communication and, to some extent, external regulation. More important than that, co-management treatment exhibit no matter the location of the communities with respect to the park- the best results in terms of sustainable use of the resource. Participants incorporated dynamic implications in their decisions when information asymmetries were overcome, through internal communication or external guidance. These results highlight the importance of resource management designs that recognize communities as key actors in decision making for the sustainable use and conservation of common pool resources in protected areas.

The rapid population and industrial growth in Zimbabwe has resulted in land degradation and negative impacts on the human and physical environment. The primary purpose of this chapter was to find out the various indigenous environmental management practices available in Chimanimani that can be adopted by other communities in the conservation and sustainable use of resources. Secondly, the study explored Indigenous Knowledge (IK) and environmental management practices that can be integrated in the teaching of Geography in secondary schools, in order to ensure there is sustainable use of resources for the current and future generations. The study was guided by Edward Said (1978) post-colonial theory. An interpretive research paradigm was adopted in the community case study. Data were generated through a documentary analysis of the Form 1–4 (2015–2022) Geography syllabus, individual and group WhatsApp chats with Geography teachers and face-to-face interviews with community indigenous environment experts. The population sample consisted of ten (10) Geography teachers drawn from three (3) secondary schools and (6) community elders who were purposively sampled from the Chimanimani community. Data were analysed by generating thick descriptions and themes. The study revealed that the Chimanimani community has cultural practices that can be adopted in the conservation of resources. The research further exposed that IK related to environmental management can be integrated in the teaching of Geography in secondary schools in order to enhance sustainable use and environmental management of resources. The study recommends the integration of Indigenous and Eurocentric models in the conservation and sustainable management of resources. The incorporation of more indigenous environmental management practices in the Geography curriculum in secondary schools can help to inculcate a culture of environmental conservation among learners and communities.KeywordsIndigenous Knowledge (IK)IntegrationEnvironmental ManagementChimanimani communityGeographySustainable

Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) is a global strategy for enhancing food productivity amidst climate change uncertainties in the 21st century. CSA improves farmers’ incomes, reduces greenhouse emissions, and farming systems become resilient to climate change. Despite the vital role that CSA plays in the development of the agricultural industry and the economy, the extent to which CSA is related to sustainable agriculture (SA) is not well documented. Is CSA the same as SA? If they are the same, do CSA practices impose mitigation requirements for developing countries like Uganda? Studies or research on CSA and SA unfortunately have certain shortcomings. Lack of this knowledge makes it difficult to plan investments and develop policies that will increase farmers’ resilience to climate change and variability to improve SA. This study is aimed at assessing how CSA links to SA and whether the two contribute to climate change mitigation requirements. It was found that CSA and SA are also related in a way that the latter leads to lowering greenhouse gas emissions hence mitigating climate change. CSA and SA share a common principal goal of achieving food security. It was concluded that developing countries are the worst affected by the negative impacts of climate change and don’t have the adaptive capacity to respond to climate change effects.

Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) represents an innovative and holistic framework designed to address the multidimensional challenges posed by climate change. By integrating traditional agricultural practices with modern technologies, CSA enhances resilience, mitigates environmental impacts, and ensures food security. Central to CSA is a systems-thinking approach that harmonizes ecological, economic, and social components to promote sustainable resource use, climate resilience, and economic viability. Key practices, such as agroforestry, precision agriculture, and intercropping, exemplify the framework's commitment to sustainability and adaptability. The collaborative nature of CSA involves the active participation of farmers, scientists, and policymakers, fostering inclusive solutions tailored to regional contexts. Additionally, CSA leverages advancements in data analytics, climate-resistant crop varieties, and water-saving irrigation methods to optimize resource utilization and mitigate risks. Global and locaClimate-Resistant Crop, Precision Agriculture, Sustainability And Adaptability

Purpose Through the application of traditional and contemporary feminist theories in gender mainstreaming, the purpose of this paper is to contribute to emergent debate on gender dimensions in climate-smart agriculture (CSA) adoption by smallholder farmers in disaster-prone regions. This is important to ensure that CSA strategies are tailored to farmer-specific gender equality goals. Design/methodology/approach An exploratory-sequential mixed methods research design which is qualitatively biased was applied. Key informant interviews and farmer focus group discussions in two study sites formed initial qualitative phase whose findings were explored in a quantitative cross-sectional household survey. Findings Findings shared in this paper indicate the predominant application of traditional gender mainstreaming approaches in CSA focusing on parochial gender dichotomy. Qualitative findings highlight perceptions that western gender approaches are not fully applicable to local contexts and realities, with gender mainstreaming in CSA seemingly to fulfil donor requirements, and ignorant of the heterogeneous nature of social groups. Quantitative findings establish that married men are majority adopters and non-adopters of CSA, while dis-adopters are predominantly de jure female household heads. The latter are more likely to adopt CSA than married women whose main role in CSA is implementers of spouse’s decisions. Access to education, intra-household power relations, productive asset and land ownership are socio-cultural dynamics shaping farmer profiles. Originality/value By incorporating African feminisms and intersectionality in CSA, value of this study lies in recommending gender policy reforms incorporating local gender contexts within the African socio-cultural milieu. This paper accentuates potential benefits of innovative blend of both contemporary and classic gender mainstreaming approaches in CSA research, practice and technology development in disaster-prone regions.

Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is an important discourse among national governments in Africa and international policy circles to increase food productivity, build smallholder farmers’ resilience to climate change, and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Despite presenting several potential economic and environmental benefits to farmers, its adoption among African smallholder farmers is low. Two important aspects that influence the adoption of CSA are inclusion and exclusion of farmers’ local knowledge and how CSA is upscaled among smallholder farmers in Africa. This article uses a systematic review methodology to demonstrate that the existing literature (between 2010-2020) on CSA has substantially addressed issues that hinder its upscaling in Africa, such as heterogeneous farming systems, limited finance, high cost of agricultural inputs, and technology. However, only eight of 30 articles included in the systematic review indicate challenges pertaining to inclusion or exclusion of local knowledge in CSA practices and technologies. Policymakers and academics need to rethink how smallholder farmers’ local knowledge can enhance opportunities and fulfil the potential to upscale CSA in Africa. Key policy insights Implementing stronger land tenure regulatory frameworks are critical for upscaling CSA practices and technologies in Africa. Governments and development partners need to implement inclusive financial policies and institutional arrangements in consultation with smallholder farmers to improve upscaling of CSA in Africa. Development partners need to approach local knowledge with care and respect, if CSA is to become more inclusive for smallholder farmers in Africa. Effective scaling of CSA is vital for climate change adaptation and mitigation in Africa.

Agriculture is a key to the Zambian economy, contributing 20% to the country’s GDP and 12% to the national export earnings. However, climate change has a negative impact on Zambian agriculture production. In line with its Vision 2030 to have an efficient, competitive, sustainable and export-led agriculture sector, Zambia is aiming to improve irrigated agriculture through large investment in irrigation. Considering climate change and variability, it is important to adopt best water and nutrient management practices for sustainable use of agricultural resources. Maize being the major staple crop of Zambia, a study was carried out to improve irrigation management by optimizing water and nitrogen use efficiency for maximum maize productivity at field level under varying water and fertilizer applications. To achieve this goal, our study used and adapted nuclear (neutron probe) and isotope (15N and 13C) techniques to the Zambian agro-ecological conditions. Drip irrigation was used as the targeted system. The experiment was implemented based on three water application levels, i.e., deficit (50% and 75% Evapotranspiration) versus optimal (100% Evapotranspiration)and three nitrogen (N) levels (140 kg.ha-1, 112 kg.ha-1 and 84 kg.ha-1, widely practiced being 112 kg.ha-1). Maize was grown as a sole crop, under drip irrigation, in rotation with a legume over the dry season of Zambia in 2021 and 2022. For both years, maize yield was ranging between 2 and 7 ton.ha-1. Results showed that deficit irrigation can be practiced without a significant negative impact on yield (with higher N levels showing significantly higher yields under deficit irrigation) and nitrogen use efficiency. The total N yield and agronomic water use efficiency were significantly higher, up to 1.5 and 3 times respectively, under deficit irrigation as compared to the optimal. Intrinsic water stress (d 13C results) was higher, though not statistically significant, under deficit irrigation. Thus, considering climate change and sustainable use of resources, deficit irrigation should be considered as the option to achieve higher yield and food security.