Abstract
Open innovation (OI) practices and intellectual capital (IC), though from developed countries and large firms’ perspective, are related to higher innovative performance. But the influence of OI paradigm on IC and consequently on firms’ innovative performance in the context of developing countries is not yet sufficiently explored. This study examined the link between OI practice and IC and their influence on the firms’ innovative performance using a survey data of 243 manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) operating in Ethiopia. Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach was applied to explore the relationships and test the mediating role of intellectual capital. The research findings indicated that OI practice has a positive and significant impact on intellectual capital and innovative performance in SMEs. It also revealed that human and organizational capitals have a significant positive effect on the innovative performance of SMEs. Moreover, the finding showed that only human capital mediates the positive influence of OI practice on the innovative performance. Managers/owners should work to improve the OI practice and intellectual capital simultaneously to augment the innovative performance of SMEs. Key words: Innovative performance, intellectual capital, open innovation practice, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
Highlights
In the globalized and dynamic business settings, open innovation (OI) is anticipated to be one of the emerging future paradigms for managing innovation activities
This paper examined the link among Open innovation (OI) practice, intellectual capital, and innovative performance using a sample of 243 manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) operating in Ethiopian
Empirical results revealed that OI practice has a significant and positive effect on the innovative performance of SMEs, supporting H1 (β=0.311, t = 4.60, p
Summary
In the globalized and dynamic business settings, open innovation (OI) is anticipated to be one of the emerging future paradigms for managing innovation activities. In this paradigm, the internal and external ideas and paths are considered vital for the commercialization of innovation activities (Chesbrough, 2003; Lee et al, 2010). Prior studies on open innovation focused primarily on high-tech and large enterprises. Few studies have analyzed OI practice in the context of SMEs focusing on the differences of OI practices in small and large firms
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
