Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare three correction methods of QT interval in African national level football players. QT interval was measured in D2 lead on resting electrocardiogram (ECG) in 216 Black male football players (age range 18 to 35 years). Corrected QT (QTc) was calculated using Bazett, Fridericia, and Framingham’s formulas. Means and percentages of long QT (QTc>440 ms and QTc≥470 ms) and short QT (QTc≤320 ms) were compared. Correlations and agreement criteria between correction methods were researched, and effects size were calculated. Heart rate was 59±9 beats/min (40 to 84) and measured QT (QTm) at 383.1±31.4 ms (320 to 480). QTc were 378.9±25.7, 380.1±23.8, and 383.1 ± 31.3 respectively with Bazett, Fridericia, and Framingham formulas; differences were not significant. According to the definition QTc>440 ms, no long QT was found using Fridericia formula whereas Bazett and Framingham showed 1.4% of long QT. Only Framingham’s formula showed long QT according to the definition QTc≥470 ms (0.9%). Framingham’s formula also showed significant difference with short QT as compared to the other methods (5.1 vs. 0.46%; p=0.008). The lower QTc value was 320 ms in all methods. Correlation and agreement were better between Bazett’s and Fridericia’s formula. Framingham’s formula showed higher proportions of long and short QT, while Fridericia’s one reduced them. Bazett's formula gave intermediate percentages. QTcË‚320 ms could be used to define short QT; 320 ms representing the lower limit in our study for the 3 formulas. Our data did not allow us to deduce a definition for the long QT. The limits of QTc ≥ 470 ms for men and QTc ≥ 480 ms for women, more adopted now in the literature, were suggested. Key words: QT interval, electrocardiogram, football player, Bazett, Fridericia, Framingham.

Highlights

  • Electrocardiogram (ECG) is a simple and practical diagnostic tool whose usefulness is recognized in athletes, in preparticipation screening for cardiovascular diseases

  • The lower extreme value of QTc was 320 ms for all formulas, allowing to obtain 11 cases of short QT according to Framingham and 1 case for each of the other formulas with significant difference

  • Other recommendations were made by the American Heart Association (AHA) experts (Rautaharju et al, 2009): (1) When QT interval is measured in leads recorded from single channel, the lead showing the longest QT should be used

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Electrocardiogram (ECG) is a simple and practical diagnostic tool whose usefulness is recognized in athletes, in preparticipation screening for cardiovascular diseases. Analysis of ST segment, T wave and QT interval during repolarization hold an important place in the interpretation. ST segment and T wave changes may evoke a coronary disease among others. The duration of the QT interval varies with heart rate (HR); the measured QT (QTm) is adjusted, to give the corrected QT (QTc). Various correction methods are proposed and normal QTc limits vary according to recommendations (Corrado et al, 2010; Drezner et al, 2013). The choice of the appropriate method and the good interpretation of results are crucial to avoid wrongly disqualifying athlete or to miss out on a potentially serious abnormality

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.