Engineering abiotic stress response in plants for biomass production

Drought, cold, high-salinity and heat are major abiotic stresses that severely reduce the yield of food crops worldwide. Traditional plant breeding approaches to improve abiotic stress tolerance of crops had limited success due to multigenic nature of stress tolerance. In the last decade, molecular techniques have been used to understand the mechanisms by which plants perceive environmental signals and further their transmission to cellular machinery to activate adaptive responses. This knowledge is critical for the development of rational breeding and transgenic strategies to impart stress tolerance in crops. Studies on physiological and molecular mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance have led to characterisation of a number of genes associated with stress adaptation. Techniques like microarrays have proven to be invaluable in generating a list of stress-related genes. Some of these genes are specific for a particular stress while others are shared between various stresses. Interestingly, a number of genes are shared in abiotic and biotic stress responses. This highlights the complexity of stress response and adaptation in plants. There is a whole cascade of genes involved in abiotic stress tolerance; starting from stress perception to transcriptional activation of downstream genes leading to stress adaptation and tolerance. A number of these genes have been discovered but we still do not have the complete list with all interactions. There is also significant number of genes with unknown functions found to be regulated by abiotic stresses. Understanding the function of these genes and their interaction with other known genes to effect stress adaptation is required.

SRO1 is an important regulator of stress and hormonal response in plants and functions by interacting with transcription factors and several other proteins involved in abiotic stress response. In the present study, we report OsRBD1, an RNA binding domain 1- containing protein as a novel interacting partner of OsSRO1a from rice. The interaction of OsSRO1a with OsRBD1 was shown in yeast as well as in planta. Domain–domain interaction study revealed that C-terminal RST domain of OsSRO1a interacts with the N-terminal RRM1 domain of OsRBD1 protein. Both the proteins were found to co-localize in nucleus. Transcript profiling under different stress conditions revealed co-regulation of OsSRO1a and OsRBD1 expression under some abiotic stress conditions. Further, co-transformation of both OsSRO1a and OsRBD1 in yeast conferred enhanced tolerance toward salinity, osmotic, and methylglyoxal treatments. Our study suggests that the interaction of OsSRO1a with OsRBD1 confers enhanced stress tolerance in yeast and may play an important role under abiotic stress responses in plants.

Role of small RNAs in abiotic stress responses in plants

Understanding abiotic stress responses in plants is an important and challenging topic in plant research. Physiological and molecular biological analyses have allowed us to draw a picture of abiotic stress responses in various plants, and determination of the Arabidopsis genome sequence has had a great impact on this research field. The availability of the complete genome sequence has facilitated access to essential information for all genes, e.g. gene products and their function, transcript levels, putative cis-regulatory elements, and alternative splicing patterns. These data have been obtained from comprehensive transcriptome analyses and studies using full-length cDNA collections and T-DNA- or transposon-tagged mutant lines, which were also enhanced by genome sequence information. Moreover, studies on novel regulatory mechanisms involving use of small RNA molecules, chromatin modulation and genomic DNA modification have enabled us to recognize that plants have evolved complicated and sophisticated systems in response to complex abiotic stresses. Integrated data obtained with various 'omics' approaches have provided a more comprehensive picture of abiotic stress responses. In addition, research on stress responses in various plant species other than Arabidopsis has increased our knowledge regarding the mechanisms of plant stress tolerance in nature. Based on this progress, improvements in crop stress tolerance have been attempted by means of gene transfer and marker-assisted breeding. In this review, we summarize recent progress in abiotic stress studies, especially in the post-genomic era, and offer new perspectives on research directions for the next decade.

Environmental stresses such as drought, high salinity, and low temperature can adversely modulate the field crop’s ability by altering the morphological, physiological, and biochemical processes of the plants. It is estimated that about 50% + of the productivity of several crops is limited due to various types of abiotic stresses either presence alone or in combination (s). However, there are two ways plants can survive against these abiotic stresses; a) through management practices and b) through adaptive mechanisms to tolerate plants. These adaptive mechanisms of tolerant plants are mostly linked to their signalling transduction pathway, triggering the action of plant transcription factors and controlling the expression of various stress-regulated genes. In recent times, several studies found that Zn-finger motifs have a significant function during abiotic stress response in plants. In the first report, a wide range of Zn-binding motifs has been recognized and termed Zn-fingers. Since the zinc finger motifs regulate the function of stress-responsive genes. The Zn-finger was first reported as a repeated Zn-binding motif, comprising conserved cysteine (Cys) and histidine (His) ligands, in Xenopus laevis oocytes as a transcription factor (TF) IIIA (or TFIIIA). In the proteins where Zn2+ is mainly attached to amino acid residues and thus espousing a tetrahedral coordination geometry. The physical nature of Zn-proteins, defining the attraction of Zn-proteins for Zn2+, is crucial for having an in-depth knowledge of how a Zn2+ facilitates their characteristic function and how proteins control its mobility (intra and intercellular) as well as cellular availability. The current review summarized the concept, importance and mechanisms of Zn-finger motifs during abiotic stress response in plants.

The ubiquitin-proteasome system in the plant response to abiotic stress: Potential role in crop resilience improvement

Chapter 15 - Impact of Nanoparticles on Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants: An Overview

Nitric oxide (NO) and polyamines play essential roles in many developmental processes and abiotic stress responses in plants. NO and polyamines are metabolized from arginine through NO synthase (NOS) and arginine decarboxylase (ADC), respectively. Function of arginase, another important enzyme involved in arginine metabolism, in abiotic stress remains largely unknown. In the recent study, we have dissected the impact of arginase on arginine metabolism and abiotic stress responses through manipulating AtARGAHs expression. The results suggested that manipulation of arginase expression modulated accumulation of arginine and direct downstream products of arginine catabolism. AtARGAHs knockout lines exhibited increased accumulation of polyamines and NO and enhanced abiotic stress tolerance, while AtARGAHs overexpressing lines displayed the opposite results. Notably, we highlighted that Arabidopsis arginase plays distinctive and dual roles in the crosstalk between polyamines and NO signaling during abiotic stress responses, mediating both arginine metabolism and reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation. It is likely that accumulation of both NO and polyamines might activate abiotic stress responses in the plant.

In recent years, the study of nitric oxide (NO) in plant systems has attracted the attention of many researchers. A growing number of investigations have shown the significance of NO as a signal molecule or as a molecule involved in the response against (a)biotic processes. NO can be responsible of the post-translational modifications (NO-PTM) of target proteins by mechanisms such as the nitration of tyrosine residues. The study of protein tyrosine nitration during development and under biotic and adverse environmental conditions has increased in the last decade; nevertheless, there is also an endogenous nitration which seems to have regulatory functions. Moreover, the advance in proteome techniques has enabled the identification of new nitrated proteins, showing the high variability among plant organs, development stage and species. Finally, it may be important to discern between a widespread protein nitration because of greater RNS content, and the specific nitration of key targets which could affect cell-signaling processes. In view of the above point, we present a mini-review that offers an update about the endogenous protein tyrosine nitration, during plant development and under several abiotic stress conditions.

Plant superoxide dismutases: Function under abiotic stress conditions -- Studies of catalase in plants under abiotic stress -- Ascorbate peroxidase functions in higher plants: The control of the balance between oxidative damage and signaling -- Glutathione reductase: Safeguarding plant cells against oxidant damage -- Function of the various MDAR isoforms in higher plants -- Peroxiredoxins: Types, characteristics and functions in higher plants -- Redox protein thioredoxins: Function under salinity, drought and extreme temperature conditions -- Biosynthesis and regulation of ascorbic acid in plants -- Glutathione metabolism and its function in higher plants adapting to stress -- Revisiting carotenoids and their role in plant stress responses: From biosynthesis to plant signaling mechanisms during stress. Abiotic stress response in plants – the relevance of tocopherols -- Role of flavonoids in plant stress. Class III peroxidases: isoenzymes functions, localization and redox regulation.

ABSTRACTDREBs belong to the ethylene response factor (ERF) family of transcription factors that bind to the DRE/CRT element in the promoter regions of a large number of genes involved in biotic and abiotic stress signaling in plants. In the recent past, there has been substantial progress towards understanding the regulatory role of DREBs in abiotic stress responses of crop plants. Following isolation from various plant species, DREB genes have been introduced into a number of transgenic plants, which showed tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses. Despite the initial success of achieving abiotic stress tolerance with DREBs, there are several issues that need further research to ensure increased plant growth and yield under abiotic stress conditions. This review focuses on the current status of research on DREB transcription factors, their role in abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic plants, and challenges confronting deployment of these plants.

Intracellular signaling is a critical determinant of the normal growth and development of plants. Signaling peptides, also known as peptide hormones, along with classical phytohormones, are the significant players of plant intracellular signaling. C-terminally encoded peptide (CEP), a 15-amino acid post-translationally peptide identified in Arabidopsis, plays a pivotal role in lateral root formation, nodulation, and act as long-distance root to shoot signaling molecule in N-starvation conditions. Expression of CEP gene members in Arabidopsis is perturbed by nitrogen starvation; however, not much is known regarding their role in other abiotic stress conditions. To gain a comprehensive insight into CEP biology, we identified CEP genes across diverse plant genera (Glycine max, Sorghum bicolor, Brassica rapa, Zea mays, and Oryza sativa) using bioinformatics tools. In silico promoter analysis revealed that CEP gene promoters show an abundance of abiotic stress-responsive elements suggesting a possible role of CEPs in abiotic stress signaling. Spatial and temporal expression patterns of CEP via RNA seq and microarray revealed that various CEP genes are transcriptionally regulated in response to abiotic stresses. Validation of rice CEP genes expression by qRT-PCR showed that OsCEP1, OsCEP8, OsCEP9, and OsCEP10 were highly upregulated in response to different abiotic stress conditions. Our findings suggest these CEP genes might be important mediators of the abiotic stress response and warrant further overexpression/knockout studies to delineate their precise role in abiotic stress response.

Ascorbate (ASC) plays a critical role in plant stress response. The antioxidant role of ASC has been well-studied, but there are still several confusing questions about the function of ASC in plant abiotic stress response. ASC can scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS) and should be helpful for plant stress tolerance. But in some cases, increasing ASC content impairs plant abiotic stress tolerance, whereas, inhibiting ASC synthesis or regeneration enhances plant stress tolerance. This confusing phenomenon indicates that ASC may have multiple roles in plant abiotic stress response not just as an antioxidant, though many studies more or less ignored other roles of ASC in plant. In fact, ACS also can act as the cofactor of some enzymes, which are involved in the synthesis, metabolism, and modification of a variety of substances, which has important effects on plant stress response. In addition, ASC can monitor and effectively regulate cell redox status. Therefore, we believe that ASC has atleast triple roles in plant abiotic stress response: as the antioxidant to scavenge accumulated ROS, as the cofactor to involve in plant metabolism, or as the regulator to coordinate the actions of various signal pathways under abiotic stress. The role of ASC in plant abiotic stress response is important and complex. The detail role of ASC in plant abiotic stress response should be analyzed according to specific physiological process in specific organ. In this review, we discuss the versatile roles of ASC in the response of plants to abiotic stresses.

Intracellular changes in calcium ions (Ca2+) in response to different biotic and abiotic stimuli are detected by various sensor proteins in the plant cell. Calmodulin (CaM) is one of the most extensively studied Ca2+-sensing proteins and has been shown to be involved in transduction of Ca2+ signals. After interacting with Ca2+, CaM undergoes conformational change and influences the activities of a diverse range of CaM-binding proteins. A number of CaM-binding proteins have also been implicated in stress responses in plants, highlighting the central role played by CaM in adaptation to adverse environmental conditions. Stress adaptation in plants is a highly complex and multigenic response. Identification and characterization of CaM-modulated proteins in relation to different abiotic stresses could, therefore, prove to be essential for a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Various studies have revealed involvement of CaM in regulation of metal ions uptake, generation of reactive oxygen species and modulation of transcription factors such as CAMTA3, GTL1, and WRKY39. Activities of several kinases and phosphatases have also been shown to be modulated by CaM, thus providing further versatility to stress-associated signal transduction pathways. The results obtained from contemporary studies are consistent with the proposed role of CaM as an integrator of different stress signaling pathways, which allows plants to maintain homeostasis between different cellular processes. In this review, we have attempted to present the current state of understanding of the role of CaM in modulating different stress-regulated proteins and its implications in augmenting abiotic stress tolerance in plants.

Plants, rooted in one place, are constantly subjected to diverse biotic and abiotic stresses that limit their growth and development, resulting in significant crop losses. In response to stresses, plants deploy several integrated signaling networks to rapidly reprogram gene expression thereby altering cellular processes to adapt and survive under unfavorable conditions. Among the key signaling mechanisms that plants use, calcium- and calcium/calmodulin-mediated signal transduction pathways have emerged as one of the ubiquitous players. The calcium-signaling networks include many calcium and calcium/calmodulin-binding transcription factors. In this review, we focus on the functions of a family of highly conserved calcium/calmodulin-binding Transcription Factors (TFs) called calmodulin-binding transcription activators (CAMTAs) in plants. This family of transcription factors was first identified in plants as calmodulin-binding proteins and discovered later in animals. Genetic studies in the model plant Arabidopsis and crop plants such as rice uncovered crucial roles for CAMTAs in modulating plant responses to both biotic and abiotic stresses. Depending on the type of stress, CAMTAs function as either positive or negative regulators for plant growth and stress responses. Arabidopsis CAMTA3 is the most studied member of CAMTA proteins. It modulates the expression of many key genes involved in different hormone signaling pathways and plays a central role in biotic (bacterial, fungal, and viral pathogens) as well as abiotic (cold, drought, salt, and wounding/mechanical) stress responses. Studies with many point, truncated, loss-of-function, and suppressor mutants of CAMTA3 revealed a complex regulation of its function. Here we summarize the advances in the study of the CAMTA family with a focus on CAMTA3. Further, we identify critical gaps in furthering our understanding of the molecular mechanisms by which these TFs function and discuss potential opportunities to engineer them for biotechnological applications to develop stress-resilient crops.