Engaging youth in food systems issues: Approaches to youth development and empowerment

Australian local government policies on creating a healthy, sustainable, and equitable food system: analysis in New South Wales and Victoria

Authors’ Response

Dietitians as change agents for promoting healthy and sustainable food systems

Feeding the City, Pandemic and Beyond

Urgent action is required by all levels of government to create a food system capable of nourishing a rapidly growing population while remaining within planetary boundaries. This study investigated policies and programs implemented by Australian local governments (LGs) that aim to contribute to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system. An online survey was completed by LGs (n=64) in New South Wales and Victoria, Australia. Questions focused on LGs' food system-related policies and programs, barriers to and enablers of engaging in food system work and organisational responsibilities for food system work. Preventing food waste, organising food-related social/cultural events and providing potable water were the most commonly reported activities. Few LGs reported policies/activities on market gardening or sustainable agricultural practices, or strengthening food system resilience. LGs implemented a wide range of initiatives, such as hosting food forums, using research to identify and address food access issues and providing healthy food and drink options within LG-owned/managed facilities. Enablers of food system work included internal LG support, human resources, external funding and partnerships. Barriers included lack of community interest, short-term and/or project-based funding, internal governance issues and restrictive state government planning frameworks. Australian LGs undertake a wide range of actions addressing diverse food system issues; however, internal and external barriers constrain their involvement in creating a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system. SO WHAT?: Legislative reform, combined with increased financial and human resource capacity, would support LGs to expand, strengthen and sustain their food system work.

To enhance sustainability, the food system requires significant shifts in the production, processing and supply of food. Ideally, a sustainable food system should operate, not only to protect the biosphere, but also to provide nutritious, high-quality food, and to support social values, an equitable economy, and human and animal health. It should also be governed responsibly within a supportive policy environment. Implementing these shifts is a task of immense scale; but citizen participation/engagement has the potential to help make sustainability a reality through distributed learning, dynamic sensing, and knowledge generation. Technological advancements in sensing and data processing have enabled new forms of citizen participation in research. When food system research is embedded within society it can help us to understand which changes towards sustainability work and which do not. Indeed, citizen engagement in food systems research has the potential to help bring citizens on side, supporting the growth of a food culture of resilience and of sustainable practises (including dietary change). This commentary provides examples of how existing research and alternative food production systems and agroecological practises may provide possible frameworks for citizen participation in food system studies. We highlight potential future food and citizen science approaches. Widening citizen participation and encouraging the involvement of other food system actors, including those in local, national and international governance, is essential to capture the full potential of citizen science in enabling transition to a sustainable food system. For the research community citizen science offers engagement and empowerment of wider communities with science; collecting and analysing data; and creating viable solutions to food system and diet issues.

Inclusive diets within planetary boundaries

An optimal diet for planet and people

The future of environmental sustainability labelling on food products

<scp>IFST</scp> vision for a <scp>UK</scp>‐wide national food strategy

Feeding the world depends on protecting our valuable ecosystems and biodiversity. Currently, increasing public awareness of the problems posed by the current industrialized food system has resulted in increased support for the creative market for economically, socially, and ecologically sustainable food production systems and enhanced demands for variations in agricultural policies and regulations. In food production, the restoration and protection of ecosystems and sustainable food systems must be given priority, which requires a forward-looking rational management strategy and fundamental changes in patterns and practices of economic development, product, and production. Food systems should be redesigned to have a neutral and positive environmental impact, as well as ensure healthy nutrition and food safety, and low environmental impact strategies should become a priority. This review paper aims to discuss, build, guide and evaluate sustainable food systems, principles, and transition strategies such as agroecological, organic, biodynamic, regenerative, urban, and precision agriculture, which are imperative visions for the management of agriculture and food production. To this end, we analyzed the evolution of the established strategies to develop sustainable agriculture and food systems, and we created assessment of key sustainability issues related to food, environment, climate, and rural development priorities and resource use practices.

Future Trends and the Pace of Change: Are We Ready?: The COVID-19 pandemic has presented an undeniable case for change. Life, work and organizations will never be “back to normal.” This opens up massive opportunities to raise our awareness of future trends and to elevate our profession, build resilience, increase our influence and visibility, and infuse futuristic competencies into our

Sustainable food systems are those that are healthy, sustainable, and equitable, while also addressing environmental challenges. The 2019 EAT-Lancet Commission on Healthy Diets for Sustainable Food Systems provides comprehensive recommendations for transforming the global food system to address malnutrition, reduce the use of antibiotics in animal agriculture, environmental degradation and climate change. However, the implementation of the EAT-Lancet recommendations has been slow and uneven across different regions and sectors. Holistic approaches to achieve food system sustainability are needed, emphasising the interconnectedness of different systems and the need for multidisciplinary approaches. One Health, Health Impact Assessment (HIA), and mandatory food fortification are all approaches that can contribute to the implementation of EAT-Lancet recommendations. The One Health approach recognizes that human health, animal health, and environmental sustainability are interconnected and that collaboration across sectors is necessary to address complex health challenges. By considering the health of animals and the environment in addition to human health, the One Health approach can inform the development of sustainable food systems that promote health for all. Health Impact Assessment (HIA) is a structured process that evaluates the potential health impacts of policies, programs, and projects. HIAs can be used to identify and address potential health risks associated with food systems and help to promote policies and interventions that support healthy and sustainable food systems. Mandatory food fortification is a strategy that involves adding essential vitamins and minerals to food products to address nutrient deficiencies. Mandatory fortification can be used to ensure that essential nutrients are present in the food supply, which can have significant impacts on public health, when consumed passively. The objective of this round table session is to show how multisectoral approaches can be used to achieve better human and planetary health and promote more sustainable and healthy food systems. This session will bring together experts from different disciplines to explore how holistic approaches can promote healthy and sustainable food systems. There will be three short presentations followed by a round table discussion in which the audience is invited to interact with the discussants. First, the One Health approach of AMR will be discussed outlining the need for a binding international legal framework. Second, a presentation on Health Impact Assessment, planning and public health in relation to the food environment in the UK will be conducted. Finally, the case for a mandatory approach of folic acid supplementation in Ireland with strict regulation, monitoring and oversight with penalties for non-compliance by the food industry is presented. Panellists will share lessons learnt from the Netherlands, the UK, Ireland and Bulgaria and the case for EU-wide approaches will be made. Key messages • Holistic approaches to achieve food system sustainability are needed, emphasising the interconnectedness of different systems and the need for multidisciplinary approaches from local to transnational. • There is a clear role for binding international legal frameworks to tackle challenges related to the food system, such as AMR, fast food outlet density and folic acid fortification. Speakers/Panelists Thom Geertsema Groningen Center Health Law, Faculty of Law, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands Ben Cave Ben Cave Associates Ltd, Leeds, UK Mary Rose Sweeney Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland Desislava Vankova Medical University of Varna, Varna, Bulgaria Nikhil Gokani University of Essex, Colchester, UK

This study explores features of food system transformations towards sustainability in the Farm to Fork Strategy in relation to perspectives of Swedish food system practitioners. Transformations towards sustainable food systems are essential to achieve the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda and the need for more sustainable food systems has been recognised in the European Green Deal and its Farm to Fork Strategy. The Swedish ambition to act as a global leader in achieving the 2030 Agenda and the European Commission’s aspiration for Europe to lead global food system transformations offer a critical opportunity to study transformational processes and agents of change in a high-income region with externalised environmental and sustainability impacts. Drawing on theories of complex systems transformations, this study identifies features of food system transformations, exploring places to intervene and examines the roles, responsibilities, and agency related to these changes. The results of this study provide three main conclusions highlighting (i) alignment of high-level policy and the perspectives of national practitioners at the paradigm level, especially concerning how food is valued, which is a crucial first step for transformational processes to come about (ii) a lack of clarity as well as diversity of pathways to transform food systems although common objectives are expressed, and (iii) governance mechanisms as enablers for a diversity of transformations. Moreover, these processes must acknowledge the contextual and complex nature of food systems and the level of agency and power of actors.

This study examines the effects of environmental films on audience beliefs and perceptions regarding food system issues. Specifically, it evaluates the impact of viewing documentary Food, Inc. and fictional film Okja on undergraduate film students. Using a Stimulus-Organism-Response framework, the researchers conducted pre-and post-questionnaires to measure participant motivations, beliefs, and perceptions. Statistical analysis using paired-sample t-tests revealed no significant differences in belief evaluations before and after viewing either film. However, both films observed substantial changes in perception assessments, with Okja demonstrating a stronger effect than Food, Inc. The study found that while both films increased audience knowledge about food systems and sustainability issues, they did not significantly alter food consumption habits. Instead, the films functioned as moral fables, providing a foundation for environmental ethics rather than directly influencing behavior. Food, Inc. primarily addressed instrumental-value ecological ethics, focusing on human health and business practices, while Okja emphasized intrinsic-value ethics, particularly animal rights. The research challenges the notion that environmental films’ primary purpose is to change audience behavior directly, arguing instead that they serve as a form of ecological communication with distinct moral and political agendas. The study concludes that these films engage in moral pedagogy to promote environmental ethics by narrating injustices in the existing food system, ultimately aiming to influence social change through policies rather than individual actions. This research contributes to understanding the nuanced effects of environmental films on audience perceptions and beliefs, highlighting the importance of considering both media logic and media effects in analyzing their impact.