Abstract
ABSTRACT The combination of conventional thermal insulation materials and phase change materials (PCMs) was proposed without damaging the appearance of REHBs, the internal insulation measures of four types of expanded polystyrene (EPS) and six kinds of PCM boards combinations were investigated, and 19 retrofit cases were obtained. By conducting detailed simulations of energy consumption and indoor temperature for different cases at different locations, and comprehensively comparing multi-objects (energy-saving, economic and low-carbon), the energy consumption, cost recovery period and carbon reduction of these cases are compared and analyzed. The results show that Case I (only EPS) has the best energy-saving performance, economy and carbon emission reduction, Case III (EPS and PCM) is the second and Case II (only PCM) is the worst. The energy-saving rate of Case I and Case III (16 ℃) differs by 5.65%, while the cost, incremental benefit and payback period differ by 9.34%, 10.2%, and 1.57 years, respectively. Case III is a new and better passive retrofit measure of the REHB. Its energy-saving, cost and carbon reduction are only about 10% lower than that of Case I, but it has better indoor comfort. The outcomes can provide a reference for the innovative energy-saving retrofit cases for REHBs.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
