Abstract
Experiences with two energy related pollution problems in Hong Kong are used to illustrate an evaluation framework for choosing among alternative forms of intervention. Often, different groups employ separate criteria (eg ease of monitoring predictability of costs) when recommending one form of control over another (eg fuel restrictions versus emissions taxes). This risks making the evaluation process piecemeal and ad hoc. The proposed framework focuses on the trade offs when one control option is chosen over others. The cases reviewed here also underscore the uses and pitfalls of using certain criteria as screening devices.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
