Abstract
Decarbonylation of the experimentally known CpRu(CO)2(η1-C5H5), CpMo(CO)2(η3-C7H7), and CpNb(CO)2(η4-C8H8) (Cp = η5-C5H5), each with uncomplexed 1,3-butadiene units in the CnHn ring, as well as the related CpTc(CO)2(η2-C6H6), to give the corresponding carbonyl-free derivatives CpM(ηn-CnHn) derivatives has been studied by density functional theory. For ruthenium, technetium, and molybdenum the coordinated CnHn ring of the intermediate monocarbonyl CpM(CO)(ηn–2-CnHn) contains an uncomplexed C═C double bond and each decarbonylation step proceeds with a significant energy barrier represented by a higher energy transition state. However, decarbonylation of CpNb(CO)2(η4-C8H8) to the monocarbonyl proceeds without an energy barrier, preserving the tetrahapto coordination of the C8H8 ring to give CpNb(CO)(η4-C8H8) in which the niobium atom has only a 16-electron configuration. All of the monocarbonyl derivatives CpM(CO)(CnHn) are predicted to be strongly energetically disfavored with respect to disproportionation to give CpM(CO)2(CnHn) + CpM(CnHn). This allows us to understand the failure to date to synthesize any of the monocarbonyl derivatives.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.