Abstract
This is the final paper in or series examining the link between the energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion. In this paper the kinetic energy of the limbs and body relative to the centre of mass (EKE, tot of paper two) is combined with the potential plus kinetic energy of the centre of mass (ECM, tot of paper three) to obtain the total mechanical energy (excluding elastic energy) of an animal during constant average-speed locomotion. The minimum mass-specific power required of the muscles and tendons to maintain the observed oscillations in total energy, Etot/Mb, can be described by one equation: Etot/Mb = 0.478 . vg 1.53 + 0.685 . vg + 0.072 where Etot/Mb is in W kg-1 and vg is in m s-1. This equation is independent of body size, applying equally as well to a chipmunk or a quail as to a horse or an ostrich. In marked contrast, the metabolic energy consumed by each gram of an animal as it moves along the ground at a constant speed increases linearly with speed and is proportional to Mb-0.3. Thus, we have found that each gram of tissue of a 30 g quail or chipmunk running at 3 m s-1 consumes metabolic energy at a rate about 15 times that of a 100 kg ostrich, horse or human running at the same speed while their muscles are performing work at the same rate. Our measurements demonstrate the importance of storage and recovery of elastic energy in larger animals, but they cannot confirm or exclude the possibility of elastic storage of energy in small animals. It seems clear that the rate at which animals consume energy during locomotion cannot be explained by assuming a constant efficiency between the energy consumed and the mechanical work performed by the muscles. It is suggested that the intrinsic velocity of shortening of the active muscle motor units (which is related to the rate of cycling of the cross bridges between actin and myosin) and the rate at which the muscles are turned on and off are the most important factors in determining the metabolic cost of constant-speed locomotion. Faster motor units are recruited as animals increase speed, and equivalent muscles of small animals have faster fibres than those of larger animals. Also, the muscles are turned on and off more quickly as an animal increases speed, and at the same speed a small animal will be turning muscles on and off at a much higher rate. These suggestions are testable, and future studies should determine if they are correct.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Recovery Of Elastic Energy
Body Size In Birds
Mechanical Energy Changes
Total Energy
Faster Motor Units
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Journal of Experimental Biology
Apr 1, 1982
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Nov 1, 1997
Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
Jan 1, 2012
Jan 18, 2021
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
May 29, 2020
Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
Jul 1, 2015
Developmental Biology
Sep 1, 1995
Frontiers in Physiology
Apr 25, 2011
Journal of Experimental Biology
Dec 1, 1998
Journal of Experimental Biology
Apr 1, 1982
Journal of Vibration and Acoustics
Jul 1, 2004
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
May 1, 2008
Journal of Applied Physiology
Dec 1, 1991
Journal of Experimental Biology
Journal of Experimental Biology
Nov 27, 2023
Journal of Experimental Biology
Nov 27, 2023
Journal of Experimental Biology
Nov 27, 2023
Journal of Experimental Biology
Nov 24, 2023
Journal of Experimental Biology
Nov 22, 2023
Journal of Experimental Biology
Nov 22, 2023
Journal of Experimental Biology
Nov 22, 2023
Journal of Experimental Biology
Nov 17, 2023
Journal of Experimental Biology
Nov 15, 2023
Journal of Experimental Biology
Nov 15, 2023