Abstract

BackgroundPerson‐centredness is important in delivering care for long‐term conditions. New models of care aim to co‐ordinate care through integration of health and social care which require new ways of working, often remotely from the patient.ObjectiveTo describe how person‐centred care is enacted within multidisciplinary groups (MDGs) created as part of a new service, integrating health and social care for older people.MethodsWe followed the implementation of eight neighbourhood MDGs, observing and interviewing staff from three MDGs at different phases of programme implementation using semi‐structured topic guides.ResultsThirty‐four MDG meetings were observed and 32 staff interviewed. Three core themes were identified which impacted on enactment of person‐centred care: the structural context of MDGs enabling person‐centred care; interaction of staff and knowledge sharing during the MDG meetings; and direct staff involvement of the person outside the MDG discussion.ConclusionsThis study provides new insights into attempts to enact person‐centred care within a new model of service delivery. Teams did what they could to enact person‐centred care in the absence of the “real” patient within MDG meetings. They were successful in delivering and co‐ordinating some aspects of care (eg prompting medication reviews, referring to social worker, health improvement and arranging further multidisciplinary team meetings for complex cases). This “absence of patients” and time pressures within the MDGs led to reliance on the “virtual” record, enhanced by additional “soft” knowledge provided by staff, rather than ensuring the patient's voice was included.

Highlights

  • In 2012, people aged 65 + accounted for 17% of the population in England, but represented 54% of hospital bed days.[1]

  • This article illustrates how new multidisciplinary groups (MDGs) set up to integrate primary and secondary health and social care were able to enact some degree of person-centredness, despite patients being absent from MDG discussions

  • Some GPs and practice nurses reported speaking with patients beforehand, and feeding back the outcome of MDG meetings to patients during routine appointments, but workload and service pressures meant there was little time to contact patients ahead of MDG discussions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2012, people aged 65 + accounted for 17% of the population in England, but represented 54% of hospital bed days.[1]. Teams did what they could to enact person-centred care in the absence of the “real” patient within MDG meetings They were successful in delivering and co-ordinating some aspects of care (eg prompting medication reviews, referring to social worker, health improvement and arranging further multidisciplinary team meetings for complex cases). This “absence of patients” and time pressures within the MDGs led to reliance on the “virtual” record, enhanced by additional “soft” knowledge provided by staff, rather than ensuring the patient’s voice was included

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.