Abstract

In this paper, we develop a robust empirical indicator for screening and detecting statistical anomalies that may provide circumstantial evidence of explicit collusion between companies or a cartelized market. The paper deals with the question of whether in the context of forensic research on cartels a Benford test can be used to improve target selection in order to increase effectiveness and efficiency in identifying companies and markets worthy of closer scrutiny. In various contexts it has been shown that a deviation from the Benford distribution can indicate fraud or data manipulation. We apply Benford’s law to released price data of the Western Australian petroleum market from 2004 to 2012. We show that the deviation from the Benford distribution in relative margin changes is positively correlated with well known indicators of collusion and conclude that anti-competitive behavior can be identified by the Benford method. Moreover, we identify periods, brands and petroleum products showing a concentration of notably higher deviations from Benford’s law.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.