Emissions of ammonia and greenhouse gases during combined pre-composting and vermicomposting of duck manure

Permafrost regions are an important source of greenhouse gases. However, the effects of different permafrost wetland types on greenhouse gas emissions and the driving factors are still unclear in the permafrost region. Here, we selected three typical permafrost wetlands from the Daxing'an Mountains to investigate the effects of permafrost wetland types on greenhouse gas emissions. The cumulative N2O, CO2, and CH4 emissions were 84–122, 657,942–1,446,121, and 173–16,924 kg km−2, respectively. The linear mixed effects model indicated that N2O emissions were significantly affected by the NO3−‐N content, whereas CO2 emissions were mainly driven by soil temperature, water table level, and NO3−‐N content. CH4 emissions were affected by soil temperature and water table level. Permafrost wetland types significantly affected the average and cumulative N2O, CO2, and CH4 emissions. The cumulative N2O emissions were highest in the Larix gmelinii ‐ Carex appendiculata (LC) wetland and lowest in the Betula fruticosa Pall. (B) wetland, driven by NO3−‐N content. The cumulative CO2 emissions were highest in the B wetland and lowest in the L. gmelinii ‐ Ledum palustre var. dilatatum (LL) wetland. The cumulative CH4 emissions from B wetland were significantly higher than those from LL and LC wetlands. The differences in cumulative CO2 and CH4 emissions were driven by the water table level. Our findings indicate that NO3−‐N content affect the spatial‐temporal variation of N2O emissions, whereas water table level influence the spatial‐temporal variation of CO2 and CH4 emissions in the permafrost region of the Daxing'an Mountains.

Calculations of the sound field in the focal region of a closed homogeneous cylindrical lens : Kanevskii, I.N., Surikov, B.S., 19 (July–August 1973) 28–31

Adding Corbicula fluminea altered the effect of plant species diversity on greenhouse gas emissions and nitrogen removal from constructed wetlands in the low-temperature season

Dairy production systems represent a significant source of air pollutants such as greenhouse gases (GHG), that increase global warming, and ammonia (NH3), that leads to eutrophication and acidification of natural ecosystems. Greenhouse gases and ammonia are emitted both by conventional and organic dairy systems. Several studies have already been conducted to design practices that reduce greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from dairy systems. However, those studies did not consider options specifically applied to organic farming, as well as the multiple trade-offs occurring between these air pollutants. This article reviews agricultural practices that mitigate greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions. Those practices can be applied to the most common organic dairy systems in northern Europe such as organic mixed crop-dairy systems. The following major points of mitigation options for animal production, crop production and grasslands are discussed. Animal production: the most promising options for reducing greenhouse gas emissions at the livestock management level involve either the improvement of animal production through dietary changes and genetic improvement or the reduction of the replacement rate. The control of the protein intake of animals is an effective means to reduce gaseous emissions of nitrogen, but it is difficult to implement in organic dairy farming systems. Considering the manure handling chain, mitigation options involve housing, storage and application. For housing, an increase in the amounts of straw used for bedding reduces NH3 emissions, while the limitation of CH4 emissions from deep litter is achieved by avoiding anaerobic conditions. During the storage of solid manure, composting could be an efficient mitigation option, depending on its management. Addition of straw to solid manure was shown to reduce CH4 and N2O emissions from the manure heaps. During the storage of liquid manure, emptying the slurry store before late spring is an efficient mitigation option to limit both CH4 and NH3 emissions. Addition of a wooden cover also reduces these emissions more efficiently than a natural surface crust alone, but may increase N2O emissions. Anaerobic digestion is the most promising way to reduce the overall greenhouse gas emissions from storage and land spreading, without increasing NH3 emissions. At the application stage, NH3 emissions may be reduced by spreading manure during the coolest part of the day, incorporating it quickly and in narrow bands. Crop production: the mitigation options for crop production focus on limiting CO2 and N2O emissions. The introduction of perennial crops or temporary leys of longer duration are promising options to limit CO2 emissions by storing carbon in plants or soils. Reduced tillage or no tillage as well as the incorporation of crop residues also favour carbon sequestration in soils, but these practices may enhance N2O emissions. Besides, the improvement of crop N-use efficiency through effective management of manure and slurry, by growing catch crops or by delaying the ploughing of leys, is of prime importance to reduce N2O emissions. Grassland: concerning grassland and grazing management, permanent conversion from arable to grassland provides high soil carbon sequestration while increasing or decreasing the livestock density seems not to be an appropriate mitigation option. From the study of the multiple interrelations between gases and between farm compartments, the following mitigation options are advised for organic mixed crop-dairy systems: (1) actions for increasing energy efficiency or fuel savings because they are beneficial in any case, (2) techniques improving efficiency of N management at field and farm levels because they affect not only N2O and NH3 emissions, but also nitrate leaching, and (3) biogas production through anaerobic digestion of manure because it is a promising efficient method to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, even if the profitability of this expensive investment needs to be carefully studied. Finally, the way the farmer implements the mitigation options, i.e. his practices, will be a determining factor in the reduction of greenhouse gas and NH3 emissions.

Dairy production systems represent a significant source of air pollutants such as greenhouse gases (GHG), that increase global warming, and ammonia (NH3), that leads to eutrophication and acidification of natural ecosystems. Greenhouse gases and ammonia are emitted both by conventional and organic dairy systems. Several studies have already been conducted to design practices that reduce greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from dairy systems. However, those studies did not consider options specifically applied to organic farming, as well as the multiple trade-offs occurring between these air pollutants. This article reviews agricultural practices that mitigate greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions. Those practices can be applied to the most common organic dairy systems in northern Europe such as organic mixed crop-dairy systems. The following major points of mitigation options for animal production, crop production and grasslands are discussed. Animal production: the most promising options for reducing greenhouse gas emissions at the livestock management level involve either the improvement of animal production through dietary changes and genetic improvement or the reduction of the replacement rate. The control of the protein intake of animals is an effective means to reduce gaseous emissions of nitrogen, but it is difficult to implement in organic dairy farming systems. Considering the manure handling chain, mitigation options involve housing, storage and application. For housing, an increase in the amounts of straw used for bedding reduces NH3 emissions, while the limitation of CH4 emissions from deep litter is achieved by avoiding anaerobic conditions. During the storage of solid manure, composting could be an efficient mitigation option, depending on its management. Addition of straw to solid manure was shown to reduce CH4 and N2O emissions from the manure heaps. During the storage of liquid manure, emptying the slurry store before late spring is an efficient mitigation option to limit both CH4 and NH3 emissions. Addition of a wooden cover also reduces these emissions more efficiently than a natural surface crust alone, but may increase N2O emissions. Anaerobic digestion is the most promising way to reduce the overall greenhouse gas emissions from storage and land spreading, without increasing NH3 emissions. At the application stage, NH3 emissions may be reduced by spreading manure during the coolest part of the day, incorporating it quickly and in narrow bands. Crop production: the mitigation options for crop production focus on limiting CO2 and N2O emissions. The introduction of perennial crops or temporary leys of longer duration are promising options to limit CO2 emissions by storing carbon in plants or soils. Reduced tillage or no tillage as well as the incorporation of crop residues also favour carbon sequestration in soils, but these practices may enhance N2O emissions. Besides, the improvement of crop N-use efficiency through effective management of manure and slurry, by growing catch crops or by delaying the ploughing of leys, is of prime importance to reduce N2O emissions. Grassland: concerning grassland and grazing management, permanent conversion from arable to grassland provides high soil carbon sequestration while increasing or decreasing the livestock density seems not to be an appropriate mitigation option. From the study of the multiple interrelations between gases and between farm compartments, the following mitigation options are advised for organic mixed crop-dairy systems: (1) actions for increasing energy efficiency or fuel savings because they are beneficial in any case, (2) techniques improving efficiency of N management at field and farm levels because they affect not only N2O and NH3 emissions, but also nitrate leaching, and (3) biogas production through anaerobic digestion of manure because it is a promising efficient method to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, even if the profitability of this expensive investment needs to be carefully studied. Finally, the way the farmer implements the mitigation options, i.e. his practices, will be a determining factor in the reduction of greenhouse gas and NH3 emissions.KeywordsAgricultureGreenhouse gasAmmoniaAbatementMixed crop-dairy systemsOrganicLivestockManureGrasslandCarbon storageSoil carbon sequestration

Changes in land use management practices may have multiple effects on microclimate and soil properties that affect soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Soil surface GHG emissions need to be better quantified in order to assess the total environmental costs of current and possible alternative land uses in the Missouri River Floodplain (MRF). The objective of this study was to evaluate soil GHG emissions (CO2, CH4, N2O) in MRF soils under long-term agroforestry (AF), row-crop agriculture (AG) and riparian forest (FOR) systems in response to differences in soil water content, land use, and N fertilizer inputs. Intact soil cores were obtained from all three land use systems and incubated under constant temperature conditions for a period of 94 days using randomized complete block design with three replications. Cores were subjected to three different water regimes: flooded (FLD), optimal for CO2 efflux (OPT), and fluctuating. Additional N fertilizer treatments for the AG and AF land uses were included during the incubation and designated as AG-N and AF-N, respectively. Soil CO2 and N2O emissions were affected by the land use systems and soil moisture regimes. The AF land use resulted in significantly lower cumulative soil CO2 and N2O emissions than FOR soils under the OPT water regime. Nitrogen application to AG and AF did not increase cumulative soil CO2 emissions. FLD resulted in the highest soil N2O and CH4 emissions, but did not cause any increases in soil cumulative CO2 emissions compared to OPT water regime conditions. Cumulative soil CO2 and N2O emissions were positively correlated with soil pH. Soil cumulative soil CH4 emissions were only affected by water regimes and strongly correlated with soil redox potential.

Greenhouse gas emission from direct seeding paddy field under different rice tillage systems in central China

Surface application of acidified cattle slurry compared to slurry injection: Impact on NH3, N2O, CO2 and CH4 emissions and crop uptake

This study investigates the effect of energy consumption on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 33 African countries from 1995–2017. It contributes to the literature by investigating the effect of disaggregated measures of energy consumption (coal, oil and other liquids, renewable energy, and electricity) on GHG emissions (CO2, N2O, CH4, and total GHG emissions) in Africa and identifies the transmission channels through which energy consumption affects GHG emissions. The system GMM is used in the study as it accounts for possible endogeneity and the potential correlation between the error term and the country fixed effects. The results show that coal consumption significantly increases CO2, CH4, and total GHG emissions and reduces N2O emissions. Oil consumption increases CO2 and total GHG emissions but reduces N2O and CH4 emissions. Renewable energy consumption reduces CO2 and CH4 emissions but increases N2O emissions. Finally, electricity consumption promotes CO2, N2O, CH4 and total GHG emissions in Africa. Further analyses show that foreign trade and economic growth are the channels through which oil consumption increases GHG emissions. The adverse effect of electricity is through urbanization. Renewable consumption could decrease GHG emissions through sustainable urbanization and trade policies. The findings suggest that countries should gradually reduce coal consumption and encourage renewable energy consumption, which has the lowest impact on the environment.

Prescribed fires or wildfires are common in natural ecosystems. Biochar input during fires can impact soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2), and nitrous oxide (N2O). Meadows are functionally important ecosystems due to their large carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) stocks and potential to mitigate GHG emissions. The effects of biochar on meadow GHG emissions may be sensitive to whether it is derived from more than one type of vegetation, especially with N addition and warming. To further our understanding of how input of fire-derived biochar affects meadow soil GHG emissions, especially under the context of N deposition and warming, we conducted this study to examine potential non-additive effects of these factors. We collected soils from meadows dominated by Miscanthus sinensis and Arundinella hirta at Wugong Mountain (Jiangxi, China). Biochar was produced by pyrolyzing the aboveground vegetation of each of the two species at 450 °C for 1 h. Mixed biochar was produced by 1:1 ratio. Soil GHG emissions and N transformations were measured by incubating soils with biochar (control, M. sinensis biochar, A. hirta biochar, mixed biochar) and N addition (control vs. 6 g m−2) treatments at different temperatures (10, 15, 20, or 25 °C). Biochar input consistently increased both CH4 and N2O flux, but only A. hirta and mixed biochar decreased CO2 emission rates. Mixed biochar imposed non-additive effects on cumulative CH4 and CO2 emissions. Biochar decreased soil nitrification rates and increased the temperature sensitivity of soil N2O emission rates. The results indicated that biochar input during fires in meadows impacts soil GHG emissions and N transformations. Input of biochar into meadow soil following fire impacted GHG emissions, and mixing biochar derived from different species imposed non-additive effects on CH4 and CO2 emissions. The variable and non-additive biochar effects on soil GHG emissions showed that fire-induced alterations in meadow soil GHG emissions will depend on the species composition of the local plant community. The effects of biochar on meadow soil GHG emissions after fires should be considered in future budgets of meadow soil GHG emissions and prediction of prescribed fire impacts on meadow ecosystems under the context of N deposition and warming.

In recent years， the rapid socio-economic development and the improvement of people's diets have driven the conversion of paddy soil to upland crop cultivation， leading to changes in soil water content， carbon and nitrogen availability， and the intensity of greenhouse gas emission. Therefore， it is crucial to study the effects of changes in soil water content and carbon and nitrogen availability on greenhouse gas CH4 and CO2 emissions and identify the key controlling factors upon rice paddy conversion into upland field， especially during the initial stage of conversion. Soil samples used in the present study were collected from a long-term rice paddy field and an adjacent upland field previously converted from rice paddy. The paddy soil was set into submerged （water to soil ratio of 2∶1） and from submerged to a slowly draining treatment （water to soil ratio of 2∶1 slowly decreased to 70% field water capacity and then remained stable） and compared with the upland soil （soil water content remained at 70% field water capacity）. Under each water gradient， the soil was supplied with labile C and N to change substrate availability： ① control （no substrate addition）， ② C addition （glucose）， ③ N addition （NH4Cl）， and ④ C and N additions （glucose+NH4Cl）. CH4 and CO2 emissions and soil biochemical properties were measured regularly during the incubation period so as to investigate the effects of soil water content， carbon and nitrogen availability， and their interaction on CH4 and CO2 emissions in paddy soil. The changes in contents of soil microbial biomass carbon （ΔMBC）， dissolved organic carbon （ΔDOC）， and soil mineral N （ΔMineral-N， containing ΔNH4+-N and ΔNO3--N） over the incubation period were calculated by subtracting the initial values from the final values at the end of the incubation period. The results showed that as compared to the submerged condition， the drainage of submerged paddy soil significantly reduced CH4 emission by 95% on average and increased CO2 emission by 46% on average. The cumulative emissions of CH4 and CO2 were significantly higher in drained paddy soil （1.36 mg·kg-1 and 584.13 mg·kg-1 for CH4 and CO2， respectively） relative to those in upland soil （0.01 mg·kg-1 and 407.70 mg·kg-1）. CH4 emissions from the submerged paddy soil significantly increased by 40% after carbon addition and decreased by 63% after nitrogen addition. The simultaneous additions of carbon and nitrogen had little effect on the CH4 emissions from submerged paddy soil. CH4 emissions from the drained paddy soil increased significantly by 48% after carbon addition， but there was no significant difference among other substrate addition treatments. In upland soil， the additions of carbon and nitrogen had no significant effect on CH4 emissions but significantly increased CO2 emissions by 45%-109%. The additions of carbon and nitrogen had little effect on CO2 emissions in submerged paddy soil. The concurrent addition of carbon and nitrogen significantly increased CO2 emissions by 36% in drained paddy soil. The interactions between soil water change and N addition had no significant effect on CH4 emissions， while the interactions between soil water change and C and CN additions significantly affected CH4 emissions. No significant interactions between soil water change and C and N availability were observed for CO2 emissions. The conversion of submerged paddy to upland soil decreased soil pH， DOC， MBC， and NH4+-N contents but increased NO3--N content. The additions of carbon and nitrogen significantly affected soil biochemical properties. The results of correlation analysis showed that CH4 emissions were significantly positively correlated with soil pH， ΔMBC， and ΔNH4+-N and negatively correlated with ΔNO3--N among treatments. Conversely， CO2 emissions were significantly positively correlated with ΔNO3--N but negatively correlated with pH， ΔDOC， ΔMBC， and ΔNH4+-N. The changes of soil chemical and biological properties induced by soil water change and carbon and nitrogen availability were the main factors influencing CH4 and CO2 emissions from paddy soil. In summary， changes in soil water content and carbon and nitrogen availability affect CH4 and CO2 emissions by altering soil biochemical properties. Drainage of paddy soil is an effective measure to reduce CH4 emissions， but the risk of increased CO2 emissions during the short-term period upon drainage should be considered. Therefore， when developing strategies for rice paddy management， it is crucial to consider the combined effects of water and C and N management so as to achieve effective greenhouse gas mitigation and green and sustainable agricultural production.

A review on the main affecting factors of greenhouse gases emission in constructed wetlands

Effects of water management on greenhouse gas emissions from farmers' rice fields in Bangladesh

Management of livestock manure may recycle nutrients and decrease greenhouse gas (GHG) and ammonia (NH3) emissions. The objectives were to ascertain effects of environmental conditions and turning on methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and NH3 emissions and if treatment with 8.5 g of dicyandiamide (DCD), a denitrification agent, altered GHG emissions. Manure and bedding were collected from feedlot pens and used to construct 3 piles (~1.9 m3 volume) each in winter (WI) and spring (SP). WI piles were turned once, and SP piles were turned twice. Methane, N2O, and NH3 emissions were collected. Methane and N2O flux measurements were collected from SP piles using a static chamber (3.7m L x 2.2m W x 0.9m H). Initial dry matter and nitrogen contents were 33.2 and 30.0% and 20.1 and 17.7 g/kg in WI and SP piles, respectively. Average ambient temperatures and wind speeds were 0.3oC and 10.7oC and 1.76 m/s and 1.97 m/s during WI and SP, respectively. Internal temperatures reached 51±3.9oC on d 4–11 and gradually decreased. Normalized CH4 averaged 2.19 mg٠s٠m-4 and N2O emissions averaged 0.84 mg٠s٠m-4, and were not different between the WI and SP piles. Turning did not affect CH4 emissions from WI piles, but were 55% greater (P < 0.05) when SP piles were turned a second time. Emissions of N2O increased 51% when WI and SP piles were turned (P < 0.05). Ammonia emissions were 83.5% greater from WI piles due to their higher initial concentrations of NH4+-N (2.21 vs. 1.11 g/kg; P < 0.05). Turning did not influence CH4 and N2O fluxes. Addition of DCD at pile formation appears to decrease N2O emissions and fluxes 3 and 10 d later. Turning management and season impacted overall CH4, N2O, and NH3 emissions. Fine-tuning manure handling and management during different seasons may effectively reduce GHG and NH3 emissions.

The study of the effects of different fertilization treatments on soil methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions in rice-vegetable rotation systems is of great significance to supplement the research gap on greenhouse gas emissions in tropical regions of China. In this study, four fertilization treatments were set up during the pepper season:phosphorus and potassium fertilizer application (PK); nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium (NPK) application; half application of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium plus half application of organic fertilizer (NPK+M); and application of organic fertilizer (M). There was no fertilizer application during the following early rice season. The objective of our study was to investigate the rules of CH4 and N2O emissions under different fertilization treatments in the pepper growth season, and the effects of different fertilization treatments in the pepper growth season on rice yield, and CH4 and N2O emissions in the following early rice growth season. The close static chamber-gas chromatography method was applied to determine soil CH4 and N2O emissions. We measured crop yield, estimated global warming potential (GWP), and calculated greenhouse gas emission intensity (GHGI). Our results showed that:① the cumulative CH4 emission under the four fertilization treatments ranged between 0.9 kg·hm-2 to 2.7 kg·hm-2 during the pepper growth season and between 5.5 kg·hm-2 to 8.4 kg·hm-2 during the early rice growth season. Compared with NPK, NPK+M and M reduced the cumulative CH4 emission in the pepper growth season by 35.3% and 7.6%, respectively; however, NPK+M and M increased the cumulative CH4 emission in the early rice season by 37.5% and 55.1%, respectively. There was a significant difference in cumulative CH4 emission between M and NPK in the early rice growth season. ② The cumulative N2O emission under the four fertilization treatments varied from 0.5 kg·hm-2 to 3.0 kg·hm-2 in the pepper growth season and from 0.3 kg·hm-2 to 0.5 kg·hm-2 in the early rice growth season. The cumulative N2O emission was significantly decreased by 33.7% in NPK+M and by 16.0% in M, compared with that in NPK. In the early rice growth season, the cumulative N2O emission was decreased by 23.5% by NPK+M but was increased by 9.1% by M. There was no significant difference in the cumulative N2O emission among the four fertilization treatments. ③ The yields of pepper and early rice under the four fertilization treatments were 3055.6-37722.5 kg·hm-2 and 5850.9-6994.4 kg·hm-2, respectively. Compared with that in NPK, NPK+M and M significantly increased pepper yield. The GWP under the four fertilization treatments in the pepper-early rice rotation system varied from 508.0 kg·hm-2 to 1864.4 kg·hm-2. Compared with NPK, NPK+M significantly decreased GWP by 25.7% and M insignificantly decreased GWP by 5.7%. The pepper growth season with the four fertilization treatments contributed to 69.2%-78.1% of the total GWP, and N2O contributed to 77.3%-85.3% of the total GWP. The GHGI ranged between 0.03 kg·kg-1 and 0.09 kg·kg-1 in the pepper growth season and between 0.04 kg·kg-1 and 0.24 kg·kg-1 in the early rice growth season. Compared with that in NPK, both M and NPK+M significantly reduced the GHGI by 71.5% and 54.7%, respectively, in the pepper growth season. In the early rice season, NPK+M significantly decreased the GHGI by 44.0%, but M non-significantly decreased the GHGI by 20.8%. The peak in N2O emission in the tropical pepper-early rice rotation system appeared after fertilization, and N2O emissions primarily occurred in the pepper growth season. However, CH4 emission was mainly concentrated in the early rice season. Considering the overall enhancing effects on crop yield and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions, the co-application of chemical and organic fertilizers (NPK+M) can be recommended as an optimal fertilization practice to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and maintain crop yield in pepper-rice rotation systems of Hainan, China.