Abstract
Some developing countries have an incentive to relax environmental regulation in order to attract foreign direct investments. These so called “pollution havens” tempt relocation of firms from developed countries that have strict environmental regulations. The governments of developed countries must take this into consideration when they design domestic environmental policies. In this paper, I examine the emission tax policy for Cournot duopolists that relocate to another country with no emission tax. Introduction of a strategic emission tax for interruption of relocation to a “pollution haven” was found effective. However, there is still the possibility that duopolists in developed countries will relocate abroad even if the regulator pre-commits the emission tax rate. As pointed out by Petrakis and Xepapadeas [2003], the regulator faces a regulatory hold-up problem when the set-up cost of relocation is sufficiently low and environmental damage is serious. Therefore, adoption of an emission tax should only occur when the set-up costs are sufficiently large.JEL Classification: L13, L22, Q55, Q58
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.