Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Medicine: Have the Stars (Finally) Aligned?
Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Medicine: Have the Stars (Finally) Aligned?
96
- 10.1001/archderm.134.8.955
- Aug 1, 1998
- Archives of Dermatology
34
- 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00387.x
- Apr 1, 1999
- Academic Emergency Medicine
202
- 10.1378/chest.125.4.1514
- Apr 1, 2004
- Chest
21
- 10.1197/j.aem.2004.03.019
- Sep 1, 2004
- Academic Emergency Medicine
56
- 10.1097/00075198-200112000-00015
- Dec 1, 2001
- Current Opinion in Critical Care
215
- 10.1086/320721
- May 17, 2001
- The Journal of Infectious Diseases
35
- 10.1097/01.ccm.0000173412.43562.b3
- Sep 1, 2005
- Critical Care Medicine
67
- 10.3201/eid0703.010323
- Jan 1, 2001
- Emerging Infectious Diseases
17
- 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.04.011
- Aug 1, 2005
- Annals of Emergency Medicine
137
- 10.1378/chest.125.4.1518
- Apr 1, 2004
- Chest
- Research Article
54
- 10.1186/1865-1380-4-44
- Jul 22, 2011
- International Journal of Emergency Medicine
Study objectivesThe goal of this study was to identify publications in the medical literature that support the efficacy or value of Emergency Medicine (EM) as a medical specialty and of clinical care delivered by trained emergency physicians. In this study we use the term "value" to refer both to the "efficacy of clinical care" in terms of achieving desired patient outcomes, as well as "efficiency" in terms of effective and/or cost-effective utilization of healthcare resources in delivering emergency care. A comprehensive listing of publications describing the efficacy or value of EM has not been previously published. It is anticipated that the accumulated reference list generated by this study will serve to help promote awareness of the value of EM as a medical specialty, and acceptance and development of the specialty of EM in countries where EM is new or not yet fully established.MethodsThe January 1995 to October 2010 issues of selected journals, including the EM journals with the highest article impact factors, were reviewed to identify articles of studies or commentaries that evaluated efficacy, effectiveness, and/or value related to EM as a specialty or to clinical care delivered by EM practitioners. Articles were included if they found a positive or beneficial effect of EM or of EM physician-provided medical care. Additional articles that had been published prior to 1995 or in other non-EM journals already known to the authors were also included.ResultsA total of 282 articles were identified, and each was categorized into one of the following topics: efficacy of EM for critical care and procedures (31 articles), efficacy of EM for efficiency or cost of care (30 articles), efficacy of EM for public health or preventive medicine (34 articles), efficacy of EM for radiology (11 articles), efficacy of EM for trauma or airway management (27 articles), efficacy of EM for using ultrasound (56 articles), efficacy of EM faculty (34 articles), efficacy of EM residencies (24 articles), and overviews and editorials of EM efficacy and value (35 articles).ConclusionThere is extensive medical literature that supports the efficacy and value for both EM as a medical specialty and for emergency patient care delivered by trained EM physicians.
- Supplementary Content
- 10.4103/jets.jets_112_24
- Jan 1, 2025
- Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock
Emergency Physicians: Creating Ripples, Expanding Domains, and Negotiating VUCA Situations
- Research Article
10
- 10.1111/1742-6723.13570
- Jul 31, 2020
- Emergency Medicine Australasia
EDs in Indonesia face an unprecedented increase in patient influx after the expansion of national health insurance system coverage. The present study aims to describe EDs' characteristics and capabilities utilisation in Jakarta. An ED inventory was created from the Jakarta Provincial Health Office and the Indonesian Hospital Association registries. The EDs that were accessible to the general public 24/7 were surveyed about their characteristics during the calendar year 2017. For further ED analysis, we stratified the hospitals into four types (A, B, C and D) based on their size and capabilities, with type A being the largest. From the 118 (81%) out of 146 EDs that responded, there were 2 million ED visits or 202 per 1000 people. The median annual visit volume was 11 200 (interquartile range 4233-18 000). Further stratification highlights the annual visit difference among hospital types where type A hospitals reported the most with 32 000 (interquartile range 13 459-38 873). Almost half of the EDs (47%) answered that ≥60% of the inpatient census came from the ED. Less than half of the EDs (44%) can manage psychiatry, oral-maxillofacial and plastic surgery cases. Consultant coverage varied across hospitals and by hospital type (P < 0.05), except for general surgery and obstetrics and gynaecology consultants who were available in most hospitals (74%). Physicians with limited experience and EDs with heterogeneous emergency care capabilities likely threatened the consistency of quality emergency care, particularly for time-sensitive conditions. Our study provides a benchmark for future improvements in emergency care.
- News Article
- 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.12.007
- Jan 18, 2011
- Annals of Emergency Medicine
Forget Paris: Emergency Physicians Can Soon Sit for US Critical Care Boards
- Front Matter
2
- 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.04.061
- May 8, 2020
- Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Critical Care During the Coronavirus Crisis—Reflections on the Roles of Anesthesiologists in Meeting the Challenges of the Pandemic
- Research Article
4
- 10.1097/ec9.0000000000000017
- Nov 10, 2021
- Emergency and Critical Care Medicine
Emergency medicine: past, present, and future challenges
- Abstract
- 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.08.329
- Sep 19, 2018
- Annals of Emergency Medicine
324 A 10-Year Look at Emergency Medicine/Critical Care Medicine Fellows: Comparison of Standardized Exams Results
- Discussion
- 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2003.09.024
- Feb 24, 2004
- Annals of Emergency Medicine
In reply
- Research Article
20
- 10.1097/ta.0000000000001851
- Jun 1, 2018
- Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Critical care fellowship training in the United States differs based on specific specialty and includes medicine, surgery, anesthesiology, pediatrics, emergency medicine, and neurocritical care training pathways. We provide an update regarding the number and growth of US critical care fellowship training programs, on-duty residents and certified diplomates, and review the different critical care physician training pathways available to residents interested in pursuing a fellowship in critical care. Data were obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and specialty boards (American Board of Internal Medicine, American Board of Surgery, American Board of Anesthesiology, American Board of Pediatrics American Board of Emergency Medicine) and the United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties for the last 16 years (2001-2017). The number of critical care fellowship training programs has increased 22.6%, with a 49.4% increase in the number of on-duty residents annually, over the last 16 years. This is in contrast to the period of 1995 to 2000 when the number of physicians enrolled in critical care fellowship programs had decreased or remained unchanged. Although more than 80% of intensivists in the US train in internal medicine critical care Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-approved fellowships, there has been a significant increase in the number of residents from surgery, anesthesiology, pediatrics, emergency medicine, and other specialties who complete specialty fellowship training and certification in critical care. Matriculation in neurocritical care fellowships is rapidly rising with 60 programs and over 1,200 neurocritical care diplomates. Critical care is now an increasingly popular fellowship in all specialties. This rapid growth of all critical care specialties highlights the magnitude of the heterogeneity that will exist between intensivists in the future.
- Front Matter
12
- 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.11.030
- Feb 15, 2012
- The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
The American Board of Thoracic Surgery: Update
- Front Matter
6
- 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.03.008
- Apr 16, 2013
- The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
The American Board of Thoracic Surgery: Update
- Research Article
6
- 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.02.023
- Apr 3, 2020
- Journal of Vascular Surgery
Vascular surgery's identity
- Abstract
- 10.1016/j.chest.2020.08.1216
- Oct 1, 2020
- Chest
ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFICACY OF A VIRTUAL MENTORSHIP PROGRAM IN CRITICAL CARE
- Research Article
- 10.4038/sljcc.v1i1.936
- Aug 11, 2009
- Sri Lanka Journal of Critical Care
<!--[if !mso]> <style> v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} </style> <![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> 12.00 </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> </xml><![endif]--> <!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} </style> <![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> </xml><![endif]--> <!--[if gte vml 1]> <![endif]-->It is with pleasure that we launch the inaugural issue of the Sri Lanka Journal of Critical Care. This is an official publication of the Postgraduate Institute of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka. The journal is peer-reviewed, and is Sri Lanka's first online-only open access journal. We do not charge a subscription fee, nor do we charge authors. The open-access model is now a favoured model for publication of scientific research, and enables wider dissemination of scientific publications. Making the journal an online only publication greatly reduces the cost of publication, while making it possible to provide it through an open-access model. The journal aims to foster research and education in critical care medicine in Sri Lanka. We are indexed on Google Scholar. Critical Care Medicine is gradually being established as a subspecialty in Sri Lanka. The Specialty Board in Critical Care and Emergency Medicine was established by the Postgraduate Institute of Medicine to function under the Board of Study for Multidisciplinary Study Courses recently. As its first activity, a Postgraduate Diploma in Critical Care was commenced this year, and the first batch of trainees have commenced training. The aim of this diploma programme is to enhance the training of junior doctors working in intensive care units throughout the country. Critical care medicine is essentially a multidisciplinary specialty. In keeping with many models of critical care medicine in Europe, the United States, and other developed countries, we support the view that training in critical care medicine must allow entry from many different disciplines, such as clinical medicine, anaesthesiology, surgery, paediatrics, obstetrics and gynaecology, and many others. We sincerely hope this journal would provide a platform for the dissemination of research, scientific thought and debate in the field of critical care medicine in Sri Lanka. We particular encourage local researchers to submit their work to our journal. We are grateful for the support given towards us towards the establishment of this journal by the Director, PGIM, the staff at the Medical Education Resource Centre of the PGIM, and members of the Specialty Board in Critical Care, and the Editorial Board. We also thank the INASP (International Network for the Availability of Scientific Publications) which supports us to make our journal available online through their Sri Lanka Journals Online project (<a href="/">www.sljol.info</a>). In particular, we thank Mrs Sioux Cumming, Programme Officer, Publishing Support, INASP, for her continuing support and assistance in maintaining the journal. DOI: 10.4038/sljcc.v1i1.936
- Research Article
5
- 10.1016/s0196-0644(82)80435-6
- Oct 1, 1982
- Annals of Emergency Medicine
Development and direction of the American Board of Emergency Medicine
- Front Matter
6
- 10.1378/chest.120.3.694
- Sep 1, 2001
- Chest
Captaining the Ship During a Storm: Who Should Care for the Critically Ill?
- Discussion
3
- 10.1111/acem.13268
- Sep 27, 2017
- Academic Emergency Medicine
Critical care is an expensive and limited resource in the United States. Estimates from more than a decade ago suggest that over $100 billion a year is spent on critical care services.1 Over the past two decades, the number of patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) requiring critical care services has increased at a much higher rate than the growth in overall ED volume.2,3 The proportion of ED patients requiring Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission has increased 75% over the first decade of the twenty-first century. In addition to the increase in the absolute number of patients requiring critical care admission, the ED length of stay for critically ill patients increased by 60 minutes. This resulted in a total nationwide increase in critical care provided in the ED by more than threefold. This disproportionate increase in critical care time reflects both the increase in critical care volume and the increase in ED boarding of critically ill patients. Data from 2008 reported the median boarding time for a patient waiting in the ED for an ICU bed was more than 5 hours, and 30% of patients waited more than 6 hours for an ICU bed.2,3 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
- Research Article
3
- 10.1093/milmed/usab392
- Sep 30, 2021
- Military medicine
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an integral aspect of critical care and emergency medicine curriculums throughout the country, but it has been slow to integrate into internal medicine residency programs. POCUS has many benefits for internal medicine providers, guiding diagnostic decisions and aiding in procedures. Additionally, POCUS is a convenient and portable resource specifically for internal medicine providers in the military when practicing in deployed or critical care settings. Critical care and emergency medicine clinicians are excellent resources to lead these courses. We sought to develop a new POCUS curriculum for internal medicine residents within the Naval Medical Center Portsmouth Internal Medicine Residency program with the support of emergency medicine and critical care medicine staff to lead and oversee the training. The project's aim was to increase internal medicine resident confidence with POCUS by 20% and proficiency with POCUS as evidenced by pretest and posttest analysis by 10%. The program consisted of a 2-day, 9-hour, introductory course, combining lecture with hands-on scanning taught by emergency medicine physicians who had completed emergency ultrasound fellowship-level training. This was followed by a longitudinal component of hands-on scanning throughout the academic year built into the residents' schedules. Emergency and critical care medicine ultrasound staff reviewed all studies for quality assurance (QA). The residents were given both precourse and post-course knowledge tests and confidence surveys, which utilized a 5-point Likert scale. The knowledge assessments were analyzed with a paired t-test, and the Likert scale data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The Naval Medical Center Portsmouth Institutional Review Board deemed this project nonhuman subjects' research. Twenty participants were enrolled, with 10 (50%) of those enrolled completing all course requirements. The average precourse knowledge assessment score was 76.60%, and postcourse assessment score was 80.95% (+4.35%, P = .33). The confidence survey scores were initially 73.33% and improved to 77.67% (+4.34%, P = .74). A curriculum comprised of a 9-hour workshop followed by a longitudinal hands-on experience can provide improvement in internal medicine resident POCUS knowledge and confidence. This model emphasizes the benefit of emergency and critical care cooperation for ultrasound training and provides an emphasis on medicine-relevant scans and longitudinal training.
- New
- Front Matter
- 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.04.006
- Nov 1, 2025
- Annals of emergency medicine
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.05.016
- Nov 1, 2025
- Annals of emergency medicine
- New
- Discussion
- 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.06.001
- Nov 1, 2025
- Annals of emergency medicine
- New
- Discussion
- 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.05.027
- Nov 1, 2025
- Annals of emergency medicine
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.04.034
- Nov 1, 2025
- Annals of emergency medicine
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.09.024
- Nov 1, 2025
- Annals of emergency medicine
- New
- Front Matter
- 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.05.025
- Nov 1, 2025
- Annals of emergency medicine
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.05.011
- Nov 1, 2025
- Annals of emergency medicine
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.06.616
- Nov 1, 2025
- Annals of emergency medicine
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.05.018
- Nov 1, 2025
- Annals of emergency medicine
- Ask R Discovery
- Chat PDF
AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.