Abstract
The paper examines the existence, if any, of differences in gross margin between rural and urban areas in Delta State, Nigeria. Data were collected from all 275 poultry farmers registered with the Delta State Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock Department. The null hypotheses was that there is no significant difference in poultry farm gross margin between locations in terms rural and urban areas; managers with formal education in agriculture and managers who have no formal education in agriculture; and managers who have and who do not have prior experience in poultry business. Data were collected from all 275 poultry farmers registered with the State Ministry Agriculture using copies of a structured questionnaire and were analyzed using frequency counts, means and T-test. Amongst the findings were: Majority of poultry business operators have low level formal education in disciplines not related to agriculture; there was a significant difference in the mean number of years of schooling and courses studied between rural and urban areas but that there was no significant difference in number of years of prior experience. The T-test results failed to reject the three null hypotheses. The study concluded that indeed elements of opportunity may vary from place to place but the ability to exploit the benefits may moderate or accentuate performance. Entrepreneurial capacity building was recommended for poultry business operators’ state wide.
Highlights
A type of dual economy, one rural and the other urban, results when social and economic infrastructures are unevenly distributed across a nation
The null hypotheses was that there is no significant difference in poultry farm gross margin between locations in terms rural and urban areas; managers with formal education in agriculture and managers who have no formal education in agriculture; and managers who have and who do not have prior experience in poultry business
Amongst the findings were: Majority of poultry business operators have low level formal education in disciplines not related to agriculture; there was a significant difference in the mean number of years of schooling and courses studied between rural and urban areas but that there was no significant difference in number of years of prior experience
Summary
A type of dual economy, one rural and the other urban, results when social and economic infrastructures are unevenly distributed across a nation. This phenomenon presents part challenges of competitive demand for land in urban centers when large expanse of land are either underutilized or lying waste in rural areas. Given motivation, Shane et al (2003), opine that entrepreneurship depends on differential access to information about economic opportunities and to the resources needed to launch a new venture. Baum et al (2001), in a slightly different but more definitive terms reported that motivation and factors related to the organization affect the performance of the venture. Differences between or among organizations in motivation and organizational factors will lead to variation in performance among organizations. Jackson and Okhomina (2006) found that the level of education of the individual entrepreneur and his/her prior experience in a related business, influence business outcome. Low, Hendersen, and Weiler, (2005) added that proximity to densely populated area, infrastructure (roads and telecommunication networks and access to financial capital) affect business success
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.