Abstract
Objective: electrically evoked auditory potential (eEAP) techniques have been developed in order to assess electrical excitability of auditory nervous pathways in deaf patients before cochlear implantation. The aim of this study was to compare eEAPs recorded after a transtympanic promontory stimulation with those obtained after a round-window stimulation during a surgical approach. Design: eEAPs were recorded after promontory and round-window stimulation in 10 deaf subjects (i.e. 14 ears) who were candidates for cochlear implantation. Results: eEAPs were successfully recorded in 13 out of 14 (93%) and 11 out of 14 (79%) ears after promontory stimulation and round-window stimulation, respectively. Similar waveforms, latencies, thresholds and eV amplitudes were observed in both cases. Conclusions: both tests provide objective and useful information for the patient selection process before cochlear implantation. Transtympanic stimulation should be preferred in clinical practice as it is less invasive than round-window stimulation and does not require surgical exposure.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Neurophysiologie Clinique / Clinical Neurophysiology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
