Abstract

In a world governed by capitalist exploitation, with extinction rates of species high and growing, biodiversity and nature conservation are high on the agendas of scientists and policy-makers. However, once conservation knowledge, policies and practices are critically scrutinized —what is to be protected, to what purpose? How, by whom, using which knowledge, authority and claims of legitimacy? With what consequences for whom? — the seeming consensus quickly dissolves. Conservation scientists and biologists often disagree with critical social and political scientists on, among others, conservation approaches (i.e., “fortress” versus community-based conservation), indigenous livelihoods and rights, the role of population growth and development, and the capitalization of conservation and its consequences.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.