Elasticity and structure of crosslinked polymers. Part I: Networks with tetrafunctional crosslinks

Abstract

served in the range 10 -3 - 1 Hz, contrary to IR or NR. The reason for this is the absence of entanglements in PDMS. Comparing the measured static moduli with those calculated by rubber elasticity theory, we found that the front factor A. / 0 is near to 0.5 in case of PDMS, but near to 1 for IR/NR networks. Both parts of the front factor may possibly cause this difference. As the PDMS chains possess a relatively high mobility we can assume that fluctuations of the junction points are less restricted than in IR/NR. This causes a structure factor A smaller than 1 in agreement with Flory's recent theory. According to James and Guth, the network chains tend =o contract during the crosslinking process. This will be more likely in the networks of entanglement-free, highly mobile PDMS chains than in IR or NR rubbers. Hence the memory term / 0 is smaller for PDMS than for IR/NR. Both alternative explanations are based on the different mobility of the chains considered. It may be assumed that the front factor is influenced by both effects and not only by the fluctuations of crosslinks.