Abstract
Lorentz force evaluation is a nondestructive evaluation method applied for the characterization of sub-surface defects in specimen consisting of layers of conducting material. The movement of a specimen under investigation relative to a permanent magnet leads to Lorentz forces that are perturbed in the presence of a defect. A minimum norm estimation (MNE) with Elastic Net Regularization (ENR) is compared to MNE with Tikhonov-Phillips-Regularization (TPR) regarding the ability to determine defect properties from force perturbation signals. A cylindrically shaped defect with diameter of 5 mm and height of 2 mm is examined at depths of 2, 4 and 8 mm. Simulated data obtained by the finite element method and measured data are considered. ENR and TPR estimated the defect depth correctly for simulation and measurement data at depths of 2 and 4 mm, while at 8 mm, only ENR estimated the depth correctly. The defect sizes were slightly overestimated for both ENR and TPR. TPR produced additional spurious solutions at the boundary of the reconstruction grid. We conclude that ENR is more suitable than TPR for MNE in Lorentz force evaluation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.