El modelo de prevención de delitos en el marco jurídico actual

This research aimed to look into the effects of corporate social responsibility and good corporate governance on corporate value. In this study, which looked at three independent variables on corporate value, researchers used financial performance as a moderating variable. Secondary data sources for this study have been gathered from the IDX (Indonesian Stock Exchange) for the period 2018-2022, with manufacturing enterprises serving as the sample. This research was carried out utilizing WarpPLS, a data analysis method that employs partial least squares. Corporate social responsibility and good corporate governance boost the value of a corporation. The influence of corporate social responsibility and good corporate governance on corporate value can be moderated by financial performance. Corporations may enhance the way they perform to provide better value and raise stock returns. The study's findings can be used by investors to make informed investment decisions. Corporate social responsibility and good corporate governance policies are one approach for the company to provide a favorable signal to stakeholders and the market about its future survival prospects. Keywords: corporate value, corporate social responsibility, good corporate governance, financial performance

The aim of this research is to test and analyze the effect of corporate social responsibility and good corporate governance towards the firm's value, and to test profitability in moderating the effect of corporate social responsibility disclosure and good corporate governance towards the firm's value. The research method used is multiple linear regression method for the first model and absolute residual value test for the second model with moderating variabel. Classical assumption test in this research consists of normality test, multicollinearity test, heteroscedasticity test, and autocorellacy test. The result of this research shows that corporate social responsibility effects the firm's value insignificantly and good corporate governance negatively effects the firm's value whilst profitability is not a moderating variable in the connection between corporate social responsibility and good corporate governance with firm's value. It is caused by some factors including investor’s consideration before doing some investment in the go public companies which is various and doesn’t consider the corporate social responsibility or good corporate governance from the company. Key Words : Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Good Corporate G overnance (GCG), Firm's Value, Profitability.

We analyse the corporate governance of professional football clubs operating in England's Premier and Football Leagues. Good corporate governance is essential if clubs are to be managed effectively and to survive in the difficult economic circumstances surrounding the football industry. The past couple of years have been especially testing, as Football League clubs have had to deal with the aftermath of the collapse of the ITV digital contract. Our analysis reveals that while there are some noticeable improvements in governance standards, many clubs would benefit from following best practice guidelines on information disclosure, the appointment of directors, board composition, induction and training of directors, risk management and consultation with stakeholders. Despite improvement in some areas over the past three years, standards of corporate governance in football clubs are significantly below those of listed companies as a whole and there is thus considerable need for improvement.Corporate governance in the UK is regulated by Company Law and by codes of corporate governance such as The Combined Code (CC) and The OECD Principles. Whereas compliance with company law is obligatory, compliance with best practice codes of corporate governance, such as the CC, is voluntary in the sense that companies listed on the London Stock Exchange must either comply with the code or else explain any instance of non‐compliance in their Annual Report. The rationale for this self‐regulatory process is that good corporate governance brings benefits to companies in terms of engendering the trust of investors and improving corporate performance. Firms will therefore find it in their own best interests to comply with the code unless there is a good reason not to do so which can be explained to shareholders in the company's statement of compliance. Since the CC was first introduced, the degree of compliance, as measured by the proportion of companies adopting best practice, has increased considerably, representing a welcome improvement in governance standards.In this paper we present results from our annual survey of FA Premier and Football League clubs, and our analysis of corporate governance statements published by listed clubs, to provide an assessment of the state of corporate governance of professional football clubs. On the basis of this analysis we make a number of recommendations for how the corporate governance of professional football clubs might be improved in the future.

This study aims to analyze the implementation of Corporate Governance in Islamic banking in Indonesia and the implementation of Corporate Governance in Islamic banking in Indonesia according to the standards of Corporate Governance by AAOIFI. This study used secondary data obtained from the annual report of Good Corporate Governance of Sharia Commercial Bank which has been published in 2019. The method used in this study is qualitative with the type of research is content analysis from the annual Good Corporate Governance report of Islamic bank in Indonesia. The results of this study indicate that the implementation of Corporate Governance at Sharia Commercial Banks in general have done good corporate governance which is marked with the result of self-assessment of every Sharia Commercial Bank which on average gets a good predicate. The results of research on the implementation of AAOIFI standards of Corporate Governance in general have applied some of the AAOIFI standards, but there is one standard AAOIFI that has not been applied by Sharia Commercial Banks other than Bank Muamalat. The standard that has not been applied is Internal Sharia Reviews which should be established in the policy.Keywords: Islamic Banking, Corporate Governance, AAOIFI

This study aims to determine the effect of financial performance on firm value by disclosing corporate social responsibility and good corporate governance as a moderating variable. This research was carried out on the Indonesia Stock Exchange and accessed financial statements at the address www.idx.com. The independent variable in this study is financial performance. Variable moderation is corporate social responsibility and good corporate governance. The dependent variable is the value of the company. This research is a quantitative approach. The data used is secondary data in the form of the company's annual financial statements. The sample in this study is a Mining Company in Indonesia which is listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The data retrieval technique used is the Proposal sampling technique with 17 sample companies within a period of 2 years, namely 2019 to 2020. Data analysis using multiple regression analysis with the help of SPSS version 24 program. The results of the study show (1) financial performance has an influence on company value positively, (2) corporate social responsibility has not been able to moderate financial performance against firm value, (3) good corporate governance has not been able to moderate financial performance against firm value.

This study aims to empirically examine the effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and Good Corporate Governance on the financial performance of banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2020. The research method used in this study is a quantitative method. The population in this study were all banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2020, where the sample used was purposive sampling criteria and obtained as many as 10 banking companies. The data analysis technique used in this study is multiple linear regression analysis, F test, and t test. Based on the research results, it can be seen that Corporate Social Responsibility has a negative and insignificant effect on the financial performance of banking companies. The reason is because Corporate Social Responsibility activities in Indonesia are still based on volunteerism, so that many companies still consider Corporate Social Responsibility activities as a burden that can reduce company profits and have no effect on financial performance. In addition, the results of this study also found that Good Corporate Governance (which is proxied by the proportion of the number of commissioners and directors) has a positive and significant effect on the financial performance of banking companies. The reason is that the more the number of boards of commissioners and the board of directors in a company can help create good governance within the company, so that the creation of good governance within a company can help improve financial performance.

The idea behind corporate social responsibility (CSR) is that companies not only have economic and legal obligation to shareholders but also obligations to stakeholders. Social responsibility (CSR) has close links with good corporate governance, like two sides of a coin; both have a strong foothold in the business world. The aim of this research was to analyze corporate social responsibility and good corporate governance to financial performance that influence the value of manufacturing companies sector basic industry and chemicals in 2015-2017, listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The results of this study stated that Corporate Social Responsibility has a positive effect on financial performance, Good Corporate Governance does not affect financial performance. Corporate Social Responsibility has a positive effect on company value. Good Corporate Governance has a positive effect on company value. Financial performance has no effect on firm value. Financial performance does not mediate the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibilities to firm value. Financial performance does not mediate the relationship between Good Corporate Governance and firm value

The idea behind corporate social responsibility (CSR) is that companies not only have economic and legal obligation to shareholders but also obligations to stakeholders. Social responsibility (CSR) has close links with good corporate governance, like two sides of a coin; both have a strong foothold in the business world. The aim of this research was to analyze corporate social responsibility and good corporate governance to financial performance that influence the value of manufacturing companies sector basic industry and chemicals in 2015-2017, listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The results of this study stated that Corporate Social Responsibility has a positive effect on financial performance, Good Corporate Governance does not affect financial performance. Corporate Social Responsibility has a positive effect on company value. Good Corporate Governance has a positive effect on company value. Financial performance has no effect on firm value. Financial performance does not mediate the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibilities to firm value. Financial performance does not mediate the relationship between Good Corporate Governance and firm value

This research aims to examine the influence of disclosure of corporate social responsibility and good corporate governance on the firm value to profitability as a moderating variable of manufactured companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2010-2012. This type of research is an association research using purposive sampling technique. The population in this study are the manufactured companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange during the years 2010-2012, as many as 91 companies as selected samples, thus, the total of observations in this study is composed of 273 companies that are analyzed using multiple linear regression with moderate regression analysis. The data used are from financial statements and sustainable report. Hypothesis testing using t test and F test. Research results showed that disclosure of corporate social responsibility and good corporate governance that is moderated affects firm value.

During the past decade, Corporate Responsibility – the voluntary engagement of business for social and environmental ends above legally mandated minimum standards – has risen to prominence, if not pre-eminence in global economic governance. However, Corporate Responsibility is not uniformly distributed: the timing, extent and quality of CR varies significantly across countries. Germany is said to be a ‘laggard’ in Corporate Responsibility. This paper both describes and tries to explain this state of affairs, by focusing on business-led Corporate Responsibility associations, coalitions and intermediaries. Examining these, I find that German firms’ stance towards CR has been characterized by ambivalence. For example, German firms joined the EBNSC (since 2000: CSR Europe) in large numbers in the mid-1990s, only to cancel their memberships a few years later. I argue that this ambivalence can be explained with reference to Germany’s institutional framework, corporate governance and regulatory standards, which until recently left less ‘space’ for German companies to engage in CR initiatives compared with their counterparts in the U.K. and U.S.A. The increasing liberalization of the German economy during the past fifteen years has been accompanied by a growing dynamism of CR in Germany, and I present causal mechanisms which link CR and liberalization. The German case suggests that Corporate Responsibility may be emerging as a substitute, rather than a complement, to institutionalized forms of solidarity.

Chaos as opportunity

Complying with Corporate Governance (CG) standards is not mandatory but with collapse of many financial institutions, compliance with high standards of CG in banking operation has become a necessity. This is due to the fact that many banks and companies worldwide collapsed as a result of poor corporate governance practices such as Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) 1991, Barings Bank 1995, Lehman Brothers 2008, Enron 2001, WorldCom 2001, etc. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to examine and ascertain whether present level of CG standards practiced by Islamic banks is adequate to prevent or safeguard the banks from collapsing. The approach of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of board and the various board committees utilizing data published in financial statement of the selected banks. The methodology used in this paper is analytical descriptive to reach accurate results and as more appropriate approach with this research. The study finds out that the selected banks comply with CG standards adopted; however such compliance does not mean that the board, the board committees will be constantly reliable. Therefore, instilling the Islamic values such as the concepts of i ḥ sân, honesty, and accountability is paramount to prevent CG failures and protect/safeguard the banks from collapsing.

This paper mainly analyzes principles and standards of some international and North European corporate governance frameworks which are issued during or after the global crisis. First, it looks at the United Nation Good corporate governance practices and analyzes its strengths and impacts on corporate governance model of a company. Second, it compared the UN standards to generally accepted governance standards of Sovereign Wealth Funds. The paper finds out that during the global crisis time 207-2008, despite taking care of risk management, there still lacks of certain governance standards in these 2 Codes. It analyzes some relative good corporate governance standards in Russia and a few North European countries including: Norway and Finland. Third, this paper provides with a short summary of evaluation of these above 2 corporate governance principles in 2 groups which can enable corporations to compare to their current codes. Last but not least, it aims to realize a limited general set of standards of corporate governance and give proper recommendations to relevant governments and organizations. Additionally, it includes a section for recommending corporate governance for developing countries including Vietnam.

This paper mainly analyzes principles and standards of some international and North European corporate governance frameworks which are issued during or after the global crisis.First, it looks at the United Nation Good corporate governance practices and analyzes its strengths and impacts on corporate governance model of a company.Second, it compared the UN standards to generally accepted governance standards of Sovereign Wealth Funds. The paper finds out that during the global crisis time 207-2008, despite taking care of risk management, there still lacks of certain governance standards in these 2 Codes. Then, it analyzes some relative good corporate governance standards in a few North European countries including: Norway and Finland.Third, this paper provides with a short summary of evaluation of these above 2 corporate governance principles in 2 groups which can enable corporations tocompare to their current codes.Last but not least, it aims to realize a limited general set of standards of corporate governance and give proper recommendations to relevant governments and organizations. Additionally, it includes a section for recommending corporate governance for developing countries including Viet Nam.

Good corporate responsibility is one principle of Good Corporate Governance (GCG). There is growing concern of GCG implementation nowadays, especially in Indonesia. Implementation of GCG, which also included responsibility, will create corporate sustainability and could be measured with responsibility rating and corporate governance rating issued by National Committee of Governance Policy.Our study employs data panel model and shows that from ten Indonesian companies from January 2010 to January 2011, either responsibility rating or corporate governance rating had no significant impact on stock’s return. It means that investors still do not take account of company’s policy regarding responsibility and corporate governance as one of their consideration in making an investment decision. Key words: Corporate responsibility, good corporate governance, Indonesian listed companies, national committee of governance policy, data panel