Abstract

This paper aims at presenting the Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG), the world’s largest Sovereign Wealth Fund, characterized by its pioneering ethical guidelines for investment decisions, based on active ownership and the exclusion of firms from its portfolio. Two major reasons for the exclusion of a company is “severe environmental damage” and “coal production”, leading to the banishment of many companies from the Fund’s holdings. Despite the noble intentions, the GPFG is loaded with inconsistencies, especially because its resources come from the exploitation of fossil fuels that contribute to global greenhouse gas emissions. Moreover, the entire Norwegian environmental policy is fragmented and suffers from contradictions.

Highlights

  • Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) have attracted a great deal of attention of economists during the past decade

  • Norway’s prudent oil rent management is reflected in its Sovereign Wealth Fund, the so called Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG), the largest SWF in the world aimed at keeping macroeconomic stability and intergenerational distribution of petroleum wealth

  • The GPFG is loaded with inconsistencies, especially because its resources come from the exploitation of fossil fuels that contribute to global greenhouse gas emissions

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) have attracted a great deal of attention of economists during the past decade Their sources of capital, objectives and investment strategies are very diverse and their actions are sometimes quite opaque. One of the major reasons for the exclusion of a company is “severe environmental damage” and several businesses were banished from the fund’s investments These guidelines lack geopolitical intentions and only aim at raising awareness among other institutional investors to consider responsible investments when selecting their portfolio and pressure companies to halt unethical practices. This work aims at presenting the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund, its role as a macroeconomic stabilization and savings fund, and its focus on responsible investment, on climate protection. The article consists of a case study from the approach of Political Economy and mainly uses statistical assessment through secondary data acquired from several international organizations as well as an analysis of reports and white papers

CONTROVERSIES ON SOVEREIGN WEALTH FUND ACTIVITY
THE GOVERNMENT PENSION FUND GLOBAL OF NORWAY
ETHICAL INVESTMENT
NEGATIVE SCREENING AND EXCLUSION
ETHICAL GUIDELINES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
PARADOXES BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL RHETORIC AND PRACTICE
Findings
CONCLUSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.